护理干预对ICU气管切开后肺部感染的效果探讨
|
摘要
目的探讨护理干预对ICU气管切开后肺部感染的效果。方法随机将我院收治的95例ICU气管切开后肺部感染的患者分成两组。针对常规组47例患者实施常规基础护理,针对研究组48例患者实施基础护理+优质护理干预,对比两组ICU气管切开后肺部感染患者的护理效果差异。结果研究组患者护理后的肺部感染改善率、并发症发生率、护理舒适度评分、ICU住院时间、肺部感染时间、心理状态评分等指标均优于常规组患者,组间比较,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论针对ICU气管切开后肺部感染患者实施优质护理干预的效果明显,缩短患者ICU治疗时间,改善患者肺部感染症状,利于患者预后,减少其他并发症现象的发生。
Objective To investigate the effect of nursing intervention on pulmonary infection after tracheotomy in ICU. Methods 95 patients with pulmonary infection after tracheotomy in our hospital were randomly divided into two groups. 47 patients in the routine group were given routine basic nursing, and 48 patients in the study group were given basic nursing + quality nursing intervention. The difference about nursing effect between the two groups of patients with pulmonary infection after tracheotomy was analyzed. Results The improvement rate of pulmonary infection, incidence of complications, nursing comfort score, ICU hospitalization time, pulmonary infection time, psychological state score and other indicators of the study group after nursing were better than those of the conventional group, and the differences between the two groups were statistically significant(P < 0.05). Conclusion The effect of high quality nursing intervention on patients with pulmonary infection after tracheotomy in ICU is obvious. It shortens the treatment time of patients with ICU, improves the symptoms of pulmonary infection, facilitates the prognosis of patients and reduces the occurrence of other complications.
Objective To investigate the effect of nursing intervention on pulmonary infection after tracheotomy in ICU. Methods 95 patients with pulmonary infection after tracheotomy in our hospital were randomly divided into two groups. 47 patients in the routine group were given routine basic nursing, and 48 patients in the study group were given basic nursing + quality nursing intervention. The difference about nursing effect between the two groups of patients with pulmonary infection after tracheotomy was analyzed. Results The improvement rate of pulmonary infection, incidence of complications, nursing comfort score, ICU hospitalization time, pulmonary infection time, psychological state score and other indicators of the study group after nursing were better than those of the conventional group, and the differences between the two groups were statistically significant(P < 0.05). Conclusion The effect of high quality nursing intervention on patients with pulmonary infection after tracheotomy in ICU is obvious. It shortens the treatment time of patients with ICU, improves the symptoms of pulmonary infection, facilitates the prognosis of patients and reduces the occurrence of other complications.
引文
[1]吕秀艳,高春霞.ICU气管切开患者肺部感染的临床护理与应用效果观察[J].中医临床研究,2017,9(29):34-35.
[2]于姗.护理干预对ICU气管切开术后患者并发症的应用效果分析[J].中国医药指南,2017,15(15):226-227.
[3]邵春梅,王淑敏.ICU气管切开患者肺部感染危险因素分析及护理对策[J].中华现代护理杂志,2016,22(15):2097-2100.
[4]潘冬青,卢玉梅,刘平.综合护理干预预防ICU气管切开患者肺内感染效果探讨[J].中国伤残医学,2016,24(10):187-189.
[5]姜秀丽,侯雪松,王雪,等.ICU气管切开患者肺部感染的护理干预及效果探析[J].系统医学,2016,1(12):146-148.
[6]李葳葳.护理干预对ICU气管切开术后患者并发症的应用效果观察[J].航空航天医学杂志,2017,28(5):633-634.
[7]陈丽敏.集束化护理干预降低神经外科气管切开患者肺部感染的效果探讨[J].医学理论与实践,2017,30(22):3404-3406.
[8]邱瑾.ICU气管切开患者肺部感染的护理干预效果观察[J].医药前沿,2015,5(33):250-251.
[9]朱晓芳.ICU气管切开患者肺部感染的护理干预措施及效果[J].医药前沿,2016,6(22):276-277.
[10]张贝尔.ICU气管切开患者肺部感染的护理干预方式初步研究[J].心理医生,2016,22(16):125-126.
[11]符春花,周保娇,李珍美,等.ICU气管切开患者肺部感染危险因素与护理干预[J].中国消毒学杂志,2017,34(8):760-763.
[12]司霞,李蕾,高玉.综合护理干预对ICU气管切开患者肺部感染的影响[J].中国保健营养,2016,26(9):217.
[13]刘捷,马柱仪,李秀东.ICU气管切开患者肺部感染的护理干预措施及效果分析[J].临床医学工程,2017,24(3):419-420.
[14]付素华,熊靖文.ICU气管切开患者肺部感染的护理干预措施及效果分析[J].基层医学论坛,2017,21(27):3771-3772.
[15]柳小霞,顾晓菊.综合护理干预对ICU气管切开患者肺部感染的影响[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2016,22(1):83-84.
[16]李雪芬.ICU气管切开患者肺部感染的护理干预措施研究[J].现代诊断与治疗,2016,27(11):2143-2144.
[17]陈爱华.ICU患者行气管切开术后并发肺部感染的护理干预效果分析[J].心理医生,2016,22(28):162-163.
[18]徐晓晓.ICU气管切开患者肺部感染的护理干预措施及效果[J].生物技术世界,2015,9(2):115.
[19]刘荣.48例ICU气管切开患者肺部感染的护理干预措施及效果[J].世界最新医学信息文摘(连续型电子期刊),2016,16(52):244-245.
[20]刘春晓,张梦云,李燕.ICU气管切开患者肺部感染的护理干预措施及效果[J].中国农村卫生,2017,10(4):63.
[2]于姗.护理干预对ICU气管切开术后患者并发症的应用效果分析[J].中国医药指南,2017,15(15):226-227.
[3]邵春梅,王淑敏.ICU气管切开患者肺部感染危险因素分析及护理对策[J].中华现代护理杂志,2016,22(15):2097-2100.
[4]潘冬青,卢玉梅,刘平.综合护理干预预防ICU气管切开患者肺内感染效果探讨[J].中国伤残医学,2016,24(10):187-189.
[5]姜秀丽,侯雪松,王雪,等.ICU气管切开患者肺部感染的护理干预及效果探析[J].系统医学,2016,1(12):146-148.
[6]李葳葳.护理干预对ICU气管切开术后患者并发症的应用效果观察[J].航空航天医学杂志,2017,28(5):633-634.
[7]陈丽敏.集束化护理干预降低神经外科气管切开患者肺部感染的效果探讨[J].医学理论与实践,2017,30(22):3404-3406.
[8]邱瑾.ICU气管切开患者肺部感染的护理干预效果观察[J].医药前沿,2015,5(33):250-251.
[9]朱晓芳.ICU气管切开患者肺部感染的护理干预措施及效果[J].医药前沿,2016,6(22):276-277.
[10]张贝尔.ICU气管切开患者肺部感染的护理干预方式初步研究[J].心理医生,2016,22(16):125-126.
[11]符春花,周保娇,李珍美,等.ICU气管切开患者肺部感染危险因素与护理干预[J].中国消毒学杂志,2017,34(8):760-763.
[12]司霞,李蕾,高玉.综合护理干预对ICU气管切开患者肺部感染的影响[J].中国保健营养,2016,26(9):217.
[13]刘捷,马柱仪,李秀东.ICU气管切开患者肺部感染的护理干预措施及效果分析[J].临床医学工程,2017,24(3):419-420.
[14]付素华,熊靖文.ICU气管切开患者肺部感染的护理干预措施及效果分析[J].基层医学论坛,2017,21(27):3771-3772.
[15]柳小霞,顾晓菊.综合护理干预对ICU气管切开患者肺部感染的影响[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2016,22(1):83-84.
[16]李雪芬.ICU气管切开患者肺部感染的护理干预措施研究[J].现代诊断与治疗,2016,27(11):2143-2144.
[17]陈爱华.ICU患者行气管切开术后并发肺部感染的护理干预效果分析[J].心理医生,2016,22(28):162-163.
[18]徐晓晓.ICU气管切开患者肺部感染的护理干预措施及效果[J].生物技术世界,2015,9(2):115.
[19]刘荣.48例ICU气管切开患者肺部感染的护理干预措施及效果[J].世界最新医学信息文摘(连续型电子期刊),2016,16(52):244-245.
[20]刘春晓,张梦云,李燕.ICU气管切开患者肺部感染的护理干预措施及效果[J].中国农村卫生,2017,10(4):63.