哲学视域下城市交通发展的新理念
|
摘要
城市交通问题在一定程度上制约和障碍了城市经济发展、社会可持续发展、城市文化繁荣,然而当前的研究成果对于解决中国城市交通中存在的技术异化问题存在一定的局限性。从哲学角度出发,提出了当下城市交通发展所需的新理念:关注最少受惠者出行利益,城市交通发展应当是符合每一位城市居民的出行利益,尤其是城市中弱势或困难个人和群体的出行利益,即最少受惠者的利益;坚持程序正义原则,现实生活中大家的关注点已经由实体正义过渡到程序正义,城市交通中任何一项制度和规范的制定、执行必须符合程序正义;坚持以建构主义为前提的进化理性主义,建构理性主义则处于优先地位,进化理性主义应该占据主要地位;坚持公共理性原则,通过合理的制度供给、合程序的制度运行,达到个体理性与公共理性相统一的目标。
o a certain extent,urban traffic problems have restricted and hindered urbaneconomic development,social sustainable development and urban cultural prosperity. However, the current research achievements have some limitations to solve the problem of technology alienation existing inurban traffic in China. From the perspective of philosophy,the new concept that is needed in the current development of urban traffic was put forward: Focusing on the travel benefits of the leastbeneficiaries,thedevelopment of urban traffic should be in line with the travel benefits of each urban resident,especially the travel benefits of the disadvantaged individuals and groups in urban areas,that is,the interests of the least beneficiaries; insisting on the principle of procedural justice,everyone's concerns in real life has transformed from substantive justice to procedural justice,the formulation and implementation of any systems and norms in urban traffic must comply with procedural justice; insisting on evolutionary rationalism that takes constructivism as a prerequisite, constructivist rationalism is a priority, and evolutionary rationalism should occupy the main position; adhering to the principle of public rationality,the goal on the unification of individual rationality and public rationality is achieved through a reasonable system of supply and procedural system of operation.
o a certain extent,urban traffic problems have restricted and hindered urbaneconomic development,social sustainable development and urban cultural prosperity. However, the current research achievements have some limitations to solve the problem of technology alienation existing inurban traffic in China. From the perspective of philosophy,the new concept that is needed in the current development of urban traffic was put forward: Focusing on the travel benefits of the leastbeneficiaries,thedevelopment of urban traffic should be in line with the travel benefits of each urban resident,especially the travel benefits of the disadvantaged individuals and groups in urban areas,that is,the interests of the least beneficiaries; insisting on the principle of procedural justice,everyone's concerns in real life has transformed from substantive justice to procedural justice,the formulation and implementation of any systems and norms in urban traffic must comply with procedural justice; insisting on evolutionary rationalism that takes constructivism as a prerequisite, constructivist rationalism is a priority, and evolutionary rationalism should occupy the main position; adhering to the principle of public rationality,the goal on the unification of individual rationality and public rationality is achieved through a reasonable system of supply and procedural system of operation.
引文
[1]黎德扬.论当代交通[J].武汉理工大学学报:社会科学版,2012(6):897-901.
[2]康晓蓉,石兰英,甘森.交通是一种哲学:专访成都市交通委员会副主任张殿业[J].西部广播电视,2009(10):32-33.
[3]陈育彬.马克思主义哲学视阈下的城市交通管理[D].杭州:浙江工业大学,2012.
[4]王彦丽.京津城际轨道交通工程的哲学问题研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2009.
[5]王健.关于北京交通拥堵的哲学思考[J].交通世界(运输·车辆),2011(2):4-5.
[6]王玮玮.科学技术哲学在山西公路交通中的应用[J].科学之友(学术版),2006(2):79-80.
[7]冯晋祥.交通运输工具的发展进程及其哲学启示[J].济南交通高等专科学校学报,2000(1):1-4.
[8]张慧彧,王辉,赵正松.老子哲学思想对交通科技信息资源共享平台发展的启示[J].公路交通科技(应用技术版),2011(8):369-372.
[9]陈楠枰.凤懋润:哲学思维看交通[J].交通建设与管理,2012(10):32-34.
[10]张杰,张清俐.哲学社会科学有助于破解交通难题[N].中国社会科学报,2013-06-14(A01).
[11]威尔·金里卡.当代政治哲学:上[M].刘莘,译.上海:上海三联书店,2003.
[12]约翰·罗尔斯.正义论[M].何怀宏,何包钢,廖申白,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988:83-84.
[13]余英时.群己之间:中国现代思想史上的两个循环[C]//许纪霖,宋宏.现代中国思想的核心观念.上海:上海人民出版社,2011:206.
[14]亚里士多德.政治学[M].吴寿彭,译.北京:商务印书馆,1965.
[15]李龙.良法论[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2001.
[16]哈耶克.法律、立法与自由:第1卷[M].邓正来,张守东,李静冰,译.北京:中国大百科全书出版社,2000.
[17]孙正聿.哲学通论[M].沈阳:辽宁人民出版社,1998.
[18]欧文.E.休斯.公共管理导论[M].2版.彭和平,周明德,金竹青,等,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2001.
[19]龚群.理性的公共性与公共理性[J].哲学研究,2009(11):107-112.
[20]詹姆斯·施密特.启蒙运动与现代性——18世纪与20世纪的对话[M].徐向东,卢华萍,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2005.
[21]约翰·罗尔斯.政治自由主义[M].万俊人,译.南京:译林出版社,2000.
[2]康晓蓉,石兰英,甘森.交通是一种哲学:专访成都市交通委员会副主任张殿业[J].西部广播电视,2009(10):32-33.
[3]陈育彬.马克思主义哲学视阈下的城市交通管理[D].杭州:浙江工业大学,2012.
[4]王彦丽.京津城际轨道交通工程的哲学问题研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2009.
[5]王健.关于北京交通拥堵的哲学思考[J].交通世界(运输·车辆),2011(2):4-5.
[6]王玮玮.科学技术哲学在山西公路交通中的应用[J].科学之友(学术版),2006(2):79-80.
[7]冯晋祥.交通运输工具的发展进程及其哲学启示[J].济南交通高等专科学校学报,2000(1):1-4.
[8]张慧彧,王辉,赵正松.老子哲学思想对交通科技信息资源共享平台发展的启示[J].公路交通科技(应用技术版),2011(8):369-372.
[9]陈楠枰.凤懋润:哲学思维看交通[J].交通建设与管理,2012(10):32-34.
[10]张杰,张清俐.哲学社会科学有助于破解交通难题[N].中国社会科学报,2013-06-14(A01).
[11]威尔·金里卡.当代政治哲学:上[M].刘莘,译.上海:上海三联书店,2003.
[12]约翰·罗尔斯.正义论[M].何怀宏,何包钢,廖申白,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988:83-84.
[13]余英时.群己之间:中国现代思想史上的两个循环[C]//许纪霖,宋宏.现代中国思想的核心观念.上海:上海人民出版社,2011:206.
[14]亚里士多德.政治学[M].吴寿彭,译.北京:商务印书馆,1965.
[15]李龙.良法论[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2001.
[16]哈耶克.法律、立法与自由:第1卷[M].邓正来,张守东,李静冰,译.北京:中国大百科全书出版社,2000.
[17]孙正聿.哲学通论[M].沈阳:辽宁人民出版社,1998.
[18]欧文.E.休斯.公共管理导论[M].2版.彭和平,周明德,金竹青,等,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2001.
[19]龚群.理性的公共性与公共理性[J].哲学研究,2009(11):107-112.
[20]詹姆斯·施密特.启蒙运动与现代性——18世纪与20世纪的对话[M].徐向东,卢华萍,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2005.
[21]约翰·罗尔斯.政治自由主义[M].万俊人,译.南京:译林出版社,2000.