保险诈骗中内外勾结行为的共犯认定
|
摘要
共同犯罪的共同是指行为的共同而非犯罪的共同。各个共同犯罪人在各自的故意或过失范围内承担责任,各自的罪名是独立的,并非必须从属于哪一方。保险诈骗罪为真正身份犯,在投保人与保险公司工作人员相互勾结骗取保金时,分为两种情形:一是保险人员未利用职务便利的情况下,由于保险诈骗罪的实行行为为单一行为,无身份者只能成立保险诈骗罪的共犯,不能成立共同正犯。二是保险人员利用了职务便利的情况下,若保险人员为主管理赔的人员时,投保人与保险人均构成职务侵占罪或贪污罪(保险公司工作人员为国家工作人员)的共同正犯;若保险人员并非主管理赔人员时,双方均属于身份犯竞合的情形,分别按照想象竞合从一重处理即可。
The common crime is common to the behavior of the common rather than the crime of the common.Each of the joint offenders shall be liable within their respective intentional or negligent limits.Their respective offenses are independent and are not necessarily subordinate to which party.Insurance fraud is a real status offense.That the insured and the insurance company staff collude to cheat premium can be divided into two cases:where the insurer does not take advantage of his duties,as the implementation of the crime of insurance fraud is a single act,no status criminal can only set up an insurance fraud crime accomplice,cannot set up aperpetrator.Where the insurer take advantage of the job,if the colluded staff is in charge of the claim,the insured and the insurer shall constitute a common offender of the crime of duty embezzlement or corruption(if the insurance company worker is a state functionary);if the staff is not in charge of the claimant,both sides belong to the situation of competing cases,respectively,according to imagine competing from a heavy punishment.
The common crime is common to the behavior of the common rather than the crime of the common.Each of the joint offenders shall be liable within their respective intentional or negligent limits.Their respective offenses are independent and are not necessarily subordinate to which party.Insurance fraud is a real status offense.That the insured and the insurance company staff collude to cheat premium can be divided into two cases:where the insurer does not take advantage of his duties,as the implementation of the crime of insurance fraud is a single act,no status criminal can only set up an insurance fraud crime accomplice,cannot set up aperpetrator.Where the insurer take advantage of the job,if the colluded staff is in charge of the claim,the insured and the insurer shall constitute a common offender of the crime of duty embezzlement or corruption(if the insurance company worker is a state functionary);if the staff is not in charge of the claimant,both sides belong to the situation of competing cases,respectively,according to imagine competing from a heavy punishment.
引文
[1]张键,臧笛名.保险欺诈类型分析及防范对策——基于对吉林省保险欺诈现状的调研[J].吉林金融研究,2014,(4):68-70.
[2]阎二鹏.共犯本质论之我见——兼议行为共同说之提倡[J].中国刑事法杂志,2010,(1):24-29.
[3]张明楷.刑法学[M].北京:法律出版社,2011:358.
[4]黎宏.共同犯罪行为共同说的合理性及其应用[J].法学,2012,(11):112-117.
[5]阎二鹏.扩张正犯概念体系的建构—兼评对限制正犯概念的反思性检讨[J].中国法学,2009,(3):115-127.
[6]谢望原.共同犯罪成立范围与共犯转化犯之共犯认定[J].国家检察官学院学报,2010,18(4):80-88.
[7]张洪兵.共犯论思考[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2009:47.
[8]陈子平.刑法总论[M].台北:元照出版有限公司,2006:104.
[9]大谷实,王昭武.共犯与身份[J].法学评论,2005,(4):123-128.
[10]刘宪权.保险诈骗疑难问题的司法认定[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2008,38(4):54-63.
[11]张明楷.保险诈骗罪的基本问题探究[J].法学,2001,(1):29-40.
[12]山口厚.刑法总论[M].付立庆,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2011:330.
[13]松原芳博.刑法总论重要问题[M].王昭武,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2014:338.
[14]松宫孝明.刑法总论讲义[M],钱叶六,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2013:225-231.
[15]赵秉志,许成磊.贿赂罪共同犯罪问题研究[J].国家检察官学院学报,2002,10(1):37-52.
[16]克劳斯·罗克辛.德国刑法总论[M].王锴,劳东燕,等,译.北京:法律出版社,2013:10-59.
[17]阴建峰.保险诈骗罪的共犯问题探究[J].河南大学学报(社会科学版),2013,53(2):40-47.
[18]陈兴良.共同犯罪论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006:319.
[19]孙万怀.保险诈骗共同犯罪的实践难题及合理解决[J].法学家,2012,(6):93-106.
[20]周光权,论身份犯的竞合[J].政法论坛,2012,30(5):123-139.
[21]张明楷.共同犯罪的认定方法[J].法学研究,2014,(3):3-25.
[22]王作富,庄劲.共同犯罪与构成身份新论[J].法学专论,2003,(11):8-12.
[23]陈兴良.身份犯之共犯——以比较法为视角的考察[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2014,(4):79-87.
[24]林维.真正身份犯之共犯问题展开——实行行为决定论的贯彻[J].法学家,2013,(6):127-139.
[25]刘明祥.论中国特色的犯罪参与体系[J].中国法学,2013,(6):117-130.
[2]阎二鹏.共犯本质论之我见——兼议行为共同说之提倡[J].中国刑事法杂志,2010,(1):24-29.
[3]张明楷.刑法学[M].北京:法律出版社,2011:358.
[4]黎宏.共同犯罪行为共同说的合理性及其应用[J].法学,2012,(11):112-117.
[5]阎二鹏.扩张正犯概念体系的建构—兼评对限制正犯概念的反思性检讨[J].中国法学,2009,(3):115-127.
[6]谢望原.共同犯罪成立范围与共犯转化犯之共犯认定[J].国家检察官学院学报,2010,18(4):80-88.
[7]张洪兵.共犯论思考[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2009:47.
[8]陈子平.刑法总论[M].台北:元照出版有限公司,2006:104.
[9]大谷实,王昭武.共犯与身份[J].法学评论,2005,(4):123-128.
[10]刘宪权.保险诈骗疑难问题的司法认定[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2008,38(4):54-63.
[11]张明楷.保险诈骗罪的基本问题探究[J].法学,2001,(1):29-40.
[12]山口厚.刑法总论[M].付立庆,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2011:330.
[13]松原芳博.刑法总论重要问题[M].王昭武,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2014:338.
[14]松宫孝明.刑法总论讲义[M],钱叶六,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2013:225-231.
[15]赵秉志,许成磊.贿赂罪共同犯罪问题研究[J].国家检察官学院学报,2002,10(1):37-52.
[16]克劳斯·罗克辛.德国刑法总论[M].王锴,劳东燕,等,译.北京:法律出版社,2013:10-59.
[17]阴建峰.保险诈骗罪的共犯问题探究[J].河南大学学报(社会科学版),2013,53(2):40-47.
[18]陈兴良.共同犯罪论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006:319.
[19]孙万怀.保险诈骗共同犯罪的实践难题及合理解决[J].法学家,2012,(6):93-106.
[20]周光权,论身份犯的竞合[J].政法论坛,2012,30(5):123-139.
[21]张明楷.共同犯罪的认定方法[J].法学研究,2014,(3):3-25.
[22]王作富,庄劲.共同犯罪与构成身份新论[J].法学专论,2003,(11):8-12.
[23]陈兴良.身份犯之共犯——以比较法为视角的考察[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2014,(4):79-87.
[24]林维.真正身份犯之共犯问题展开——实行行为决定论的贯彻[J].法学家,2013,(6):127-139.
[25]刘明祥.论中国特色的犯罪参与体系[J].中国法学,2013,(6):117-130.