喀斯特风水林和荒山生态系统碳储量的研究(英文)
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Carbon storage of ecosystems in holly hill and barren hill karst area
  • 作者:陶玉华 ; 白丽蓉
  • 英文作者:TAO Yuhua;BAI Lirong;Guangxi Key Laboratory of Marine Disaster in Beibu Gulf,Key Laboratory of Coastal Science and Engineering in Beibu Gulf,Qinzhou University;
  • 关键词:碳储量 ; 生物量 ; 风水林 ; 荒山 ; 喀斯特
  • 英文关键词:carbon storage;;biomass;;holly hill;;barren hill;;karst
  • 中文刊名:GXZW
  • 英文刊名:Guihaia
  • 机构:广西北部湾海洋灾害研究重点实验室广西北部湾海岸科学与工程实验室钦州学院;
  • 出版日期:2018-03-28 13:17
  • 出版单位:广西植物
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.38
  • 基金:Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(31761143001);; Qinzhou University HighLevel Scientific Research Foundation for Talent Introduction(2017KYQD203);; Guangxi Key Laboratory of Marine Disaster in the Beibu Gulf(2018TS01)~~
  • 语种:英文;
  • 页:GXZW201808018
  • 页数:8
  • CN:08
  • ISSN:45-1134/Q
  • 分类号:98-105
摘要
所研究的风水林和荒山属于喀斯特地貌。喀斯特森林是一种脆弱的低生物量生态系统,土壤贫瘠,自我修复能力低,易受人为因素干扰。风水林指人们居住地附近的一片茂盛的森林,认为有神居住而崇拜,严禁被砍伐和破坏。荒山是喀斯特森林植被在人为干扰后出现岩石裸露产生的石漠化现象。该研究通过野外调查、实验室分析、数理统计等对广西罗城喀斯特风水林和荒山生态系统碳储量进行对比性研究。结果表明:喀斯特风水林植被、土壤和枯落物碳储量分别是荒山的7.42倍、5.9倍和1.1倍,风水林和荒山生态系统碳储量分别为137.06、93.73 t·hm~(-2),其中土壤碳库贡献率最高,而林下植被和枯落物却较低,表明风水林森林生态系统碳储量明显高于荒山。通过风水林和荒山的碳储量比较研究,为评价风水林碳汇提供依据,为制定森林管理政策、保护村社水平的植被提供数据参考。此外,还探讨了少数民族朴素的生态伦理思想在保护森林和增汇方面的作用,丰富了生态伦理学内容,对传承和弘扬少数民族传统文化、恢复生态具有重要意义。
        Holly hill and barren hill both exist in karst landform,karst forest is a fragile and low-biomass ecosystem with barren soil and low resilience and resistance capabilities to disturbance. The holly hill is the place where the vegetation is well protected by the indigenous people who live nearby based on their beliefs,the barren hill is comprised of rocky karst formations that contain the areas of exposed bedrock due to human disturbance. The study is about comparison of carbon storage of ecosystem in holly hill and barren hill,the carbon stocks of holly hill and barren hill ecosystems were studied through field work,laboratory analysis and statistic at Luocheng,Guangxi,China. The results showed that vegetation,soil and litter carbon storage of holly hill ecosystems were 7.42,5.9 and 1.1 times those of barren hill ecosystems respectively. Carbon storage were 137.06,93.73 t·hm~(-2) at holly hill and barren hill ecosystems respectively,soil carbon storage contributed most in the two ecosystems,and understory and litter contributed less. The comparison of carbon storage of holly hill and barren hill reflects the importance of protecting karst forest,keeping traditional aboriginal culture means a lot for protecting ecological environment and improving carbon sequestration.
引文
ESWARAN H,BERG EVD,RRICH P,1993.Organic carbon in soils of the world[J].Soil Sci Soc Am J,57(1):192-194.
    HU F,DU H,ZENG FP,et al,2017.Carbon storage and its allocation in karst forest at different stand ages in Guangxi,China[J].Chin J Appl Ecol,28(3):721-729.
    LI WB,HU YQ,XU MF,et al,2015.Stand structure and biomass carbon density in a subtropical evergreen broadleaved forest of heterogeneous diversity[J].J Fujian Agric For Univ,44(3):256-263.
    LIU AZ,PEI SJ,CHEN SY,2000.Nationality’s sacred groves and biodiversity conservation in Chuxiong,Yunnan[J].Chin J Appl Ecol,11(4):489-492.
    LIU ZK,WANG SP,CHEN ZZ,et al,2006.Properties of soil nutrients and plant community after rest grazing in Inner Mongolia steppe,China[J].Acta Ecol Sin,26(6):2048-2056.
    QI JF,TANG JW,2008.Biomass and its allocation pattern of monsoon rain forest over limestone in Xishuangbanna of Southwest China[J].Chin J Ecol,27(2):167-177.
    TIAN DL,WANG XK,FANG X,et al,2011.Carbon storage and spatial distribution in different vegetation restoration patterns in karsts area,Guizhou Province[J].Sci Silv Sin,47(9):7-14.
    TU YL,YANG J,1995.Study on biomass of the karst scrub community in central region of Guizhou Province[J].Car Sin,14(3):199-208.
    WANG KL,SU YR,ZENG FP,et al,2008.Ecological process and vegetation restoration in karst region of Southwest China[J].Res Agric Modern,29(6):641-645.
    WHITTAKER RH,WOODWELL GM,1968.Dimension and production relations of trees and shrubs in the Brookhaven Forest,New York[J].J Ecol,56(1):1-25.
    XIA HB,2010.Biomass and net primary production in different successional stages of karst vegetatmn in Maolan,SW China[J].Guizhou For Sci Technol,38(2):1-7.
    YAN JH,ZHOU CY,WEN AB,et al,2011.Relationship between soil organic carbon and bulk density in the rocky desertification process of karst ecosystem in Guizhou[J].J Trop Subtrop Bot,19(3):273-278.
    YANG HK,CHENG SZ,1991.Study on biomass of the karst forest community in Maolan,Guizhou Province[J].Acta Ecol Sin,11(4):307-312.
    YANG HK,1995.Karst desertification and assessment of its disasters[J].Mar Geol Quat Geol,15(3):137-147.
    YU WL,DONG D,NI J,2010.Comparisons of biomass and net primary productivity of karst and non-Karst forests in mountainous areas,Southwestern China[J].J Subtrop Resourc Environ,5(2):25-30.
    ZHANG Y,SHI XZ,YU DS,et al,2009.Factors affecting variation of soil organic carbon density in Yunnan,Guizhou,Guangxi region[J].Acta Pedol Sin,46(3):526-531.
    ZHANG Z,ZHONG QL,CHENG DL,et al,2014.The Structure characteristics of carbon storage of ecosystem of evergreen broad-leaved mixed forest with different forest ages in the north-west of Fujian Province[J].Ecol Environ Sci,23(2):203-210.
    ZHONG XF,YANG YS,GAO R,et al,2008.Carbon storage and allocation in old-growth Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation in subtropical China[J].J Subtrop Resourc Environ,3(2):11-18.
    ZHOU YR,YU ZL,ZHAO SD,2000.Carbon storage and budget of major Chinese forest types[J].Acta Phytoecol Sin,24(5):518-522.
    ZHOU H,ZHAO DG,LU HH,2002.Significance of ecological ethics of cultural tradition in Deity Mountain forests[J].Chin J Ecol,21(4):60-64.
    ZHOU WL,XIONG KN,LONG J,et al,2011.Organic carbon density features and regional variation of the topsoil in karst demonstration areas of rocky desertification integrated rehabilitation[J].Chin J Soil Sci,42(5):1131-1137.
    ZHU SQ,WEI LM,CHEN ZR,et al,1995.Preliminary study on biomass components of karst forest in Maolan of Guizhou Province,China[J].Acta Phytoecol Sin,19(4):358-367.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700