青贮全株玉米与全株甜高粱饲喂肉羊效果对比
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Feeding Mutton Sheep Contrast Test by Silage Whole Corn and Whole Silage Sweet Sorghum
  • 作者:李晓燕 ; 魏晓燕 ; 许开云 ; 赵咏中
  • 英文作者:LI Xiao-yan;WEI Xiao-yan;XU Kai-yun;ZHAO Yong-zhong;Wuwei Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science Research Institute;
  • 关键词:青贮全株玉米 ; 青贮全株甜高梁 ; 增重 ; 肉羊
  • 英文关键词:Corn silage;;sweet sorghum silage;;weight gain;;mutton sheep
  • 中文刊名:XMSZ
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine
  • 机构:武威市畜牧兽医科学研究院;
  • 出版日期:2019-05-10
  • 出版单位:畜牧兽医杂志
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.38;No.188
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:XMSZ201903028
  • 页数:3
  • CN:03
  • ISSN:61-1085/S
  • 分类号:85-87
摘要
为了研究青贮全株玉米与青贮全株甜高粱饲喂肉羊效果,本试验将40只小尾寒羊羔羊随机分为2组,试验Ⅰ组为青贮玉米组,试验Ⅱ组为青贮甜高粱组。结果表明:饲喂青贮甜高粱组羊只的采食量比青贮玉米组提高了13.25%,平均体重稍高于青贮全株玉米组羊只(P>0.05);饲喂青贮甜高梁组羊只的总增重和日增重均显著高于饲喂青贮全株玉米组羊只(P<0.05),且试验Ⅱ组比试验Ⅰ组日增重提高了13.9%,增重明显,效果良好。
        This experiment was to explore the effect of corn silage and sweet sorghum silage feeding mutton sheep. 40 small-tailed Han sheep lambs were randomly divided into two groups. The experimental group I was silage corn group and the test group II was silage sweet sorghum group. The results showed that the feed intake of the silage-sweet sorghum group was 13.25% higher than that of the silage corn group, and the average body weight was slightly higher than that of the silage whole corn group(P>0.05). The total weight gain and daily gain of the sheep fed the silage sweet sorghum group were significantly higher than those of the silage whole corn group(P<0.05), and the daily weight gain of the test group II was 13.9% higher than that of the group I. The weight gain effect of Experiment II was better than that of Experiment I.
引文
[1] 韦瑛,王耀.武威市饲用甜高粱生产现状及产业化推进对策[J].中国糖料,2018,40(1):75-77.
    [2] 渠晖,沈益新.甜高梁用作青贮作物的潜力评价[J].草地学报,2011,19(5):808-812.
    [3] 柴庆伟.利用甜高梁秸秆榨汁后的皮渣替代玉米秸秆制取青贮饲料[D].石河子:石河子大学,2010.
    [4] 付晓悦,侯明杰,尚占环,等.饲用甜高粱青贮对肉羊养分利用的影响[J].草业科学,2018,35(5):1240-1246.
    [5] 卢庆善,甜高梁[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2008.
    [6] 付晓悦.甜高粱和玉米青贮饲粮育肥肉羊的养分利用与肉质性能研究[D].兰州:兰州大学,2018.
    [7] 侯明杰,付晓悦,尚占环,等.饲用甜高粱青贮对小尾寒羊瘤胃代谢参数的影响[J].草业科学,2018,35(5):1232-1239.
    [8] Podkówka Z,Podkówka L.Chemical composition and quality of sweet sorghum and maize silages[J].Journal of Central European Agricul-ture,2011,12(2):294-303.
    [9] Marcoa O N,Ressia M A,Arias S,et al.Digestibility of forage silages from grain,sweet and bmr sorghum types:Comparison of in vivo,in situ and in vitro data[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2009(153):161-168.
    [10] 李春宏,张培通,郭文涛,等.甜高梁青贮饲料研究与利用现状及展望[J].2014,42(3):150-152.
    [11] 邵丽玮,安永福,王晓芳,等.甜高粱的饲用价值及其在畜牧生产中的应用[J].养殖与饲料,2016(9):42-45.
    [12] 周泉佚,马先锋.苜蓿干草和裹包青贮玉米混合育肥肉羊效果研究[J].中国草食动物科学,2018,38(3):69-71.
    [13] 辛志图.青贮玉米秸秆饲喂肉羊增重效果试验[J].甘肃畜牧兽医,2017,47(12):97-100.
    [14] 申爱华,李保全,周蔚,等.添加尿素青贮玉米秸秆对肉羊有效性的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2017,45(20):196-198.
    [15] 马耀春.全株青贮玉米不同切碎长度对肉羊增重的影响[J].中国动物保健,2017,19(6):7-8.
    [16] 刘波,李存彬,吴军.青贮玉米饲喂肉羊对比试验[J].中国畜牧兽医文摘,2016,32(3):225-226.
    [17] 李学钊,严建鹏,吴兴明,等.饲用型甜高粱肉羊饲用效价研究[J].中兽医医药杂志,2018,37(6):54-55.
    [18] 王婷,侯明杰,尚占环,等.甜高粱和玉米青贮对肉羊肌纤维组织及其相关肉质性状的影响[J].草业科学,2018,35(11):2722-2727.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700