造纸法再造烟叶工艺流程中中性香味物质的变化
|
摘要
利用气相色谱-质谱联用法(GC-MS)分析了造纸法再造烟叶工艺流程中各阶段的中性香味物质种类及含量。结果表明:1)浸提工艺促进酮类、呋喃类等香味物质种类增加,但香味物质总含量明显减少; 2)打浆工艺可促进滤渣中部分新香味物质的溶出,但总体香味物质种类及含量进一步减少; 3)抄造干燥工艺造成浆料中原有的大量香味物质散失,且减少的多为易挥发物质,应适度控制干燥温度; 4)浸提液浓缩过程产生较多的新香味物质,且香味物质总量也有一定增加; 5)涂布干燥工艺使得浓缩液中原有的大量香味物质显著减少或完全散失,这与研究采用90℃的干燥温度有一定的关系。
The types and contents of aroma substances generated from various stages of tobacco leaf remanufacturing process by papermaking technology were analyzed by gas chromatography and mass spectrometry. The results showed that: 1) Extracting technology promoted the increase of ketones,furans and other aroma substances,however,the total content of aroma substance was decreased; 2)The beating technology promoted the production of new aroma substance,but the total types and contents of aroma substance were further decreased; 3) The drying process lead to the loss of a large amount of original aroma substances in the pulp,most of which were volatile substances. So the drying temperature should be moderately controlled; 4) In the process of concentration,several new types of aroma substances were produced,and the total contents were also increased; 5) The coating and drying technology significantly reduced or completely eliminated a large amount of original aroma substances in the concentrated solution,which may be attributed to application of the 90 ℃ drying temperature in this study.
The types and contents of aroma substances generated from various stages of tobacco leaf remanufacturing process by papermaking technology were analyzed by gas chromatography and mass spectrometry. The results showed that: 1) Extracting technology promoted the increase of ketones,furans and other aroma substances,however,the total content of aroma substance was decreased; 2)The beating technology promoted the production of new aroma substance,but the total types and contents of aroma substance were further decreased; 3) The drying process lead to the loss of a large amount of original aroma substances in the pulp,most of which were volatile substances. So the drying temperature should be moderately controlled; 4) In the process of concentration,several new types of aroma substances were produced,and the total contents were also increased; 5) The coating and drying technology significantly reduced or completely eliminated a large amount of original aroma substances in the concentrated solution,which may be attributed to application of the 90 ℃ drying temperature in this study.
引文
[1]李华雨,常岭,王相凡,等.再造烟叶生产中浓缩温度对提取液中中性香味成分的影响[J].烟草科技,2016,49(7):60-69.
[2]戴路,沈凯,袁凯龙,等.再造烟叶浓缩液中美拉德反应研究[J].食品工业,2013,34(9):88-90.
[3]孙先玉,孙博,李冬玲,等.造纸法再造烟叶加工技术研究进展[J].生物质化学工程,2011,45(6):49-56.
[4]陈祖刚,蔡冰,王建新,等.国内外造纸法薄片工艺与品质比较[J].烟草科技,2002,35(2):4-10.
[5]韩文佳,赵传山.造纸法烟草薄片发展现状[J].黑龙江造纸,2007,35(4):47-49.
[6]罗冲,温洋兵,胡惠仁,等.制浆工艺对造纸法烟草薄片性质的影响[J].纸和造纸,2012,31(7):37-40.
[7]李鲁,葛少林.烟草薄片中蛋白质的酶解研究[J].安徽农业科学,2009,37(27):13079; 13086.
[8]杨乾栩,和智君,杨蕾,等.复合酶条件优化对烟梗品质提升研究[J].食品与生物技术学报,2016,35(11):1206-1211.
[9]林凯.酶法对烟梗丝降解效果的研究[J].安徽农业科学,2011,39(11):6500-6501.
[10]程昌合,吴继忠,廖付,等.浓缩液醇化处理对烟草薄片致香成分及感官质量的影响[J].安徽农学通报(上半月刊),2011,17(1):142-144.
[11]殷艳飞,马迅,王保兴,等.涂布率对造纸法再造烟叶品质的影响[J].云南大学学报(自然科学版),2014,36(S1):130-134.
[12]蒋宇凡,俞京,徐保明,等.乙醇-水混合液在再造烟叶提取中的应用[J].造纸科学与技术,2018,37(3):7-12.
[13] WONG K H,AZIZ S A,MOHAMED S. Sensory aroma from Maillard reaction of individual and combination of amino acids with glucose in acidic conditions[J].International Journal of Food Science&Technology,2008,43(9):1512-1519.
[14]赖炜扬,林凯,鹿洪亮,等.再造烟叶正交优化提取及其化学成分和致香成分分析[J].厦门大学学报(自然科学版),2016,55(1):144-148.
[15]白晓莉,邹泉,董伟,等.工艺加工对再造烟叶致香成分、有害成分和感官质量的影响[J].烟草科技,2009,42(10):12-16; 20.
[16]高徐梅,李新生,严新龙,等.利用美拉德反应降低再造烟叶中的还原糖[J].烟草科技,2014,47(12):52-56.
[17]李国政,周浩,陈芝飞,等.造纸法再造烟叶主要工艺过程中的阳离子含量[J].烟草科技,2017,50(6):47-52.
[18]邱晔,王建,卢伟.国内外造纸法烟草薄片的烟气主要有害物释放量研究及其烟气危害性评估[J].现代科学仪器,2010(3):85-88.
[19]李姗姗,马迅,向海英,等.国内外造纸法再造烟叶纤维形态指标分析[J].纸和造纸,2016,35(1):37-40.
[20]赵秋蓉,李力群,杨燕,等.国内外主要品牌造纸法再造烟叶综合品质差异性分析[J].南方农业学报,2014,45(7):1253-1257.
[2]戴路,沈凯,袁凯龙,等.再造烟叶浓缩液中美拉德反应研究[J].食品工业,2013,34(9):88-90.
[3]孙先玉,孙博,李冬玲,等.造纸法再造烟叶加工技术研究进展[J].生物质化学工程,2011,45(6):49-56.
[4]陈祖刚,蔡冰,王建新,等.国内外造纸法薄片工艺与品质比较[J].烟草科技,2002,35(2):4-10.
[5]韩文佳,赵传山.造纸法烟草薄片发展现状[J].黑龙江造纸,2007,35(4):47-49.
[6]罗冲,温洋兵,胡惠仁,等.制浆工艺对造纸法烟草薄片性质的影响[J].纸和造纸,2012,31(7):37-40.
[7]李鲁,葛少林.烟草薄片中蛋白质的酶解研究[J].安徽农业科学,2009,37(27):13079; 13086.
[8]杨乾栩,和智君,杨蕾,等.复合酶条件优化对烟梗品质提升研究[J].食品与生物技术学报,2016,35(11):1206-1211.
[9]林凯.酶法对烟梗丝降解效果的研究[J].安徽农业科学,2011,39(11):6500-6501.
[10]程昌合,吴继忠,廖付,等.浓缩液醇化处理对烟草薄片致香成分及感官质量的影响[J].安徽农学通报(上半月刊),2011,17(1):142-144.
[11]殷艳飞,马迅,王保兴,等.涂布率对造纸法再造烟叶品质的影响[J].云南大学学报(自然科学版),2014,36(S1):130-134.
[12]蒋宇凡,俞京,徐保明,等.乙醇-水混合液在再造烟叶提取中的应用[J].造纸科学与技术,2018,37(3):7-12.
[13] WONG K H,AZIZ S A,MOHAMED S. Sensory aroma from Maillard reaction of individual and combination of amino acids with glucose in acidic conditions[J].International Journal of Food Science&Technology,2008,43(9):1512-1519.
[14]赖炜扬,林凯,鹿洪亮,等.再造烟叶正交优化提取及其化学成分和致香成分分析[J].厦门大学学报(自然科学版),2016,55(1):144-148.
[15]白晓莉,邹泉,董伟,等.工艺加工对再造烟叶致香成分、有害成分和感官质量的影响[J].烟草科技,2009,42(10):12-16; 20.
[16]高徐梅,李新生,严新龙,等.利用美拉德反应降低再造烟叶中的还原糖[J].烟草科技,2014,47(12):52-56.
[17]李国政,周浩,陈芝飞,等.造纸法再造烟叶主要工艺过程中的阳离子含量[J].烟草科技,2017,50(6):47-52.
[18]邱晔,王建,卢伟.国内外造纸法烟草薄片的烟气主要有害物释放量研究及其烟气危害性评估[J].现代科学仪器,2010(3):85-88.
[19]李姗姗,马迅,向海英,等.国内外造纸法再造烟叶纤维形态指标分析[J].纸和造纸,2016,35(1):37-40.
[20]赵秋蓉,李力群,杨燕,等.国内外主要品牌造纸法再造烟叶综合品质差异性分析[J].南方农业学报,2014,45(7):1253-1257.