知识积累与地区创新非线性关系研究——基于省际面板数据门槛效应
|
摘要
基于省际数据,采用门槛效应模型方法,探究内、外知识积累与地区创新之间的非线性关系。研究结果表明:(1)内部积累与地区创新存在显著双重门槛效应,具体表现为"左拖尾倒U型"关系;(2)外部积累对地区创新也存在显著双重门槛效应,表现为"右拖尾U型"关系;(3)仅当知识存量水平处于第二类型时,内、外积累同时促进地区创新,且与外部积累相比,内部积累影响强度更大;(4)历史数据表明,我国大部分地区创新的提升归因于内部积累,而非外部,且东部地区先于中西部地区实现内、外部的促进作用。
Based on the province-level data,using the threshold model,this paper explores the nonlinear relationship between knowledge accumulation and regional innovation. Results show that,firstly,there are double threshold effect between internal accumulation and regional innovation,showing‘left trailing inverted U-shaped'; secondly,there are also double threshold effect between external accumulation and regional innovation,showing ‘right trailing u-shaped'; thirdly,only when the knowledge accumulation level is in the second type,the accumulation of internal and external can simultaneously promote regional innovation,and compared with external accumulation,internal accumulation has a stronger influence. Lastly,compared with the central and western regions,the eastern region achieves the promotion of both internal and external earlier.
Based on the province-level data,using the threshold model,this paper explores the nonlinear relationship between knowledge accumulation and regional innovation. Results show that,firstly,there are double threshold effect between internal accumulation and regional innovation,showing‘left trailing inverted U-shaped'; secondly,there are also double threshold effect between external accumulation and regional innovation,showing ‘right trailing u-shaped'; thirdly,only when the knowledge accumulation level is in the second type,the accumulation of internal and external can simultaneously promote regional innovation,and compared with external accumulation,internal accumulation has a stronger influence. Lastly,compared with the central and western regions,the eastern region achieves the promotion of both internal and external earlier.
引文
[1]Forés B,Camisón C.Does Incremental and Radical Innovation Performance Depend on Different Types of Knowledge Accumulation Capabilities and Organizational Size?[J].Journal of Business Research,2016,69(2):831-848.
[2]马玉成,李垣,付强.成熟企业资源构建对技术创新影响研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015(6):138-146.
[3]陈恒,侯建.自主研发创新、知识积累与科技绩效---基于高技术产业数据的动态门槛机理研究[J].科学学研究,2016,34(9):1301-1309.
[4]马茹.社会资本对中国区域创新的影响分析---基于空间知识溢出视角[J].软科学,2017,31(2):29-32.
[5]薛捷.市场知识对科技型小微企业破坏性创新的影响[J].科学学研究,2016,34(4):582-590.
[6]Cohen W M,Levinthal D A.Adsorptive Capacity:A New Perspective on Learning[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1990,35(1):128-152.
[7]王涛,黄兰兰,周正.外部创新源对企业创新绩效影响的实证研究---以吸收能力为中介变量[J].软科学,2016,30(5):50-53+73.
[8]Grigoriou K,Rothaermel F T.Organizing for Knowledge Generation:Internal Knowledge Networks and the Contingent Effect of External Knowledge Sourcing[J].Strategic Management Journal,2017,38(2):395-414.
[9]Liao S H,Fei W C,Liu C T.Relationships between Knowledge Inertia,Organizational Learning and Organization Innovation[J].Technovation,2008.28(4):183-195.
[10]周健明,陈明,刘云枫.知识惯性、知识整合与新产品开发绩效研究[J].科学学研究,2014,32(10):1531-1538.
[11]张军,许庆瑞.企业知识积累与创新能力演化间动态关系研究---基于系统动力学仿真方法[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015(1):128-138.
[12]Bao Y,Sheng S,Zhou K Z.Network-based Market Knowledge and Product Innovativeness[J].Marketing Letters,2012,23(1):309-324.
[13]曾德明,陈培祯.企业知识基础、认知距离对二元式创新绩效的影响[J].管理学报,2017,14(8):1182-1189.
[14]Florjański J.Kósek A,Zalewski J,et al.Innovation Capabilities of European Nations:Cross-national Analyses of Patents and Sales of Product Innovations[J].Research Policy,2004,33(2):193-207.
[15]Romer P M.Endogenous Technological Change[J].Journal of Political Economy,1990,98(5,Part 2):S71-S102.
[16]严太华,刘焕鹏.自主研发与知识积累:基于金融发展视角的门限模型研究[J].中国管理科学,2015,23(5):73-81.
[17]刘思明,侯鹏,赵彦云.知识产权保护与中国工业创新能力[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2015(3):40-57.
[18]魏江,许庆瑞.企业技术能力作用于创新效益的经济控制模型研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,1997(9):42-45.
(1)数据来源于《2016年全国科技经费投入统计公报》。
(2)http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/sjjd/201710/t20171009_1540394.html(国家统计局相关报告)
(3)数据来源于《2017全球创新指数报告》。
(1)专利授权数需要经过审批,具有时间滞后性和信息失真等缺点,专利申请数比专利授权数更能反映地区创新真实值。
(2)选取这一指标的原因:其一,该指标能较好地衡量知识引进数量;其二,该指标能反映知识的价值,价值越高,价格越高。
(3)研发价格指数是由居民消费价格指数和固定资产价格指数分别赋权重45%和55%加权平均而得。
(4)外商投资额按当年汇率将美元折算为人民币。
(1)限于篇幅,备索。
(1)限于篇幅,备索。
[2]马玉成,李垣,付强.成熟企业资源构建对技术创新影响研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015(6):138-146.
[3]陈恒,侯建.自主研发创新、知识积累与科技绩效---基于高技术产业数据的动态门槛机理研究[J].科学学研究,2016,34(9):1301-1309.
[4]马茹.社会资本对中国区域创新的影响分析---基于空间知识溢出视角[J].软科学,2017,31(2):29-32.
[5]薛捷.市场知识对科技型小微企业破坏性创新的影响[J].科学学研究,2016,34(4):582-590.
[6]Cohen W M,Levinthal D A.Adsorptive Capacity:A New Perspective on Learning[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1990,35(1):128-152.
[7]王涛,黄兰兰,周正.外部创新源对企业创新绩效影响的实证研究---以吸收能力为中介变量[J].软科学,2016,30(5):50-53+73.
[8]Grigoriou K,Rothaermel F T.Organizing for Knowledge Generation:Internal Knowledge Networks and the Contingent Effect of External Knowledge Sourcing[J].Strategic Management Journal,2017,38(2):395-414.
[9]Liao S H,Fei W C,Liu C T.Relationships between Knowledge Inertia,Organizational Learning and Organization Innovation[J].Technovation,2008.28(4):183-195.
[10]周健明,陈明,刘云枫.知识惯性、知识整合与新产品开发绩效研究[J].科学学研究,2014,32(10):1531-1538.
[11]张军,许庆瑞.企业知识积累与创新能力演化间动态关系研究---基于系统动力学仿真方法[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015(1):128-138.
[12]Bao Y,Sheng S,Zhou K Z.Network-based Market Knowledge and Product Innovativeness[J].Marketing Letters,2012,23(1):309-324.
[13]曾德明,陈培祯.企业知识基础、认知距离对二元式创新绩效的影响[J].管理学报,2017,14(8):1182-1189.
[14]Florjański J.Kósek A,Zalewski J,et al.Innovation Capabilities of European Nations:Cross-national Analyses of Patents and Sales of Product Innovations[J].Research Policy,2004,33(2):193-207.
[15]Romer P M.Endogenous Technological Change[J].Journal of Political Economy,1990,98(5,Part 2):S71-S102.
[16]严太华,刘焕鹏.自主研发与知识积累:基于金融发展视角的门限模型研究[J].中国管理科学,2015,23(5):73-81.
[17]刘思明,侯鹏,赵彦云.知识产权保护与中国工业创新能力[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2015(3):40-57.
[18]魏江,许庆瑞.企业技术能力作用于创新效益的经济控制模型研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,1997(9):42-45.
(1)数据来源于《2016年全国科技经费投入统计公报》。
(2)http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/sjjd/201710/t20171009_1540394.html(国家统计局相关报告)
(3)数据来源于《2017全球创新指数报告》。
(1)专利授权数需要经过审批,具有时间滞后性和信息失真等缺点,专利申请数比专利授权数更能反映地区创新真实值。
(2)选取这一指标的原因:其一,该指标能较好地衡量知识引进数量;其二,该指标能反映知识的价值,价值越高,价格越高。
(3)研发价格指数是由居民消费价格指数和固定资产价格指数分别赋权重45%和55%加权平均而得。
(4)外商投资额按当年汇率将美元折算为人民币。
(1)限于篇幅,备索。
(1)限于篇幅,备索。