单发与多发脑梗死患者的临床对比及危险因素分析
|
摘要
目的通过对单发与多发脑梗死患者进行危险因素对比,为病症预防或治疗提供参考。方法选取200例脑梗死患者,单发脑梗死100例,多发脑梗死100例。并针对单发、多发进行分组,单发脑梗死为研究组、多发脑梗死为实验组。比较两组的各单因素进行统计学差异分析,将有统计学意义的因素进行多因素对比。结果通过对两组患者的多因素比较,得出平均年龄、性别、高血压史、糖尿病史、房颤、脑梗病史、吸烟等因素是主要的危险因素,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论经过对照,年龄、高血压、糖尿病、吸烟、房颤是致病的主要危险因素。
Objective To provide a reference for the prevention or treatment of the disease by comparing the risk factors between patients with single and multiple cerebral infarction. Methods There were 200 cases of cerebral infarction, 100 cases of single cerebral infarction and 100 cases of multiple cerebral infarction. For single and multiple groups, single infarction was the study group and multiple cerebral infarction was the experimental group. Comparing the two groups of single factors for statistical difference analysis, there will be statistical significance of the factors for multi-factor comparison. Results The multivariate comparison of the two groups showed that the mean age, gender, history of hypertension, history of diabetes, atrial fibrillation, history of cerebral infarction, smoking and other factors were the main risk factors, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion After comparison, age, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and atrial fibrillation are the main risk factors for disease.
Objective To provide a reference for the prevention or treatment of the disease by comparing the risk factors between patients with single and multiple cerebral infarction. Methods There were 200 cases of cerebral infarction, 100 cases of single cerebral infarction and 100 cases of multiple cerebral infarction. For single and multiple groups, single infarction was the study group and multiple cerebral infarction was the experimental group. Comparing the two groups of single factors for statistical difference analysis, there will be statistical significance of the factors for multi-factor comparison. Results The multivariate comparison of the two groups showed that the mean age, gender, history of hypertension, history of diabetes, atrial fibrillation, history of cerebral infarction, smoking and other factors were the main risk factors, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion After comparison, age, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and atrial fibrillation are the main risk factors for disease.
引文
[1]周艳雯,戴亚辉,靳令经,等.急性多发性后循环脑梗死的危险因素及病因学分析[J].医学临床研究,2016,33(3):420-423.
[2]李宜军,王满侠,马茜,等.颈动脉粥样硬化与多发腔隙性脑梗死的相关性分析[J].临床内科杂志,2016,33(7):454-457.
[3]王刚.MRI与CT在老年多发性脑梗死病人诊断中的临床结果比较[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2016,7(22):229.
[4]刘娟,陈巍.MRI与CT在老年多发性脑梗死患者诊断中的临床结果比较[J].医学信息,2016,29(6):310.
[5]金志文.用CT与MRI诊断老年多发性脑梗死患者的临床对比[J].中国医药指南,2017,15(8):177.
[6]李世学,张芳,孙艳霞.脑梗死后早期癫痫发作的临床特征及危险因素分析[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志,2016,19(14):60-61.
[7]翟洁敏,李会琪,何剑波.中青年与老年脑梗死危险因素和临床特点分析[J].陕西医学杂志,2016,45(8):1019-1021.
[8]王春芳,臧大维.前、后循环梗死危险因素及临床特征对比分析[J].医学理论与实践,2016,29(22):3026-3029.
[9]刘阿楠.急性脑梗死出血性转化的临床特征及危险因素分析[J].中国现代药物应用,2016,10(10):57-58.
[10]张春曜.MRI与CT在老年多发性脑梗死患者诊断中的临床结果比较[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2017,4(10):1913.
[2]李宜军,王满侠,马茜,等.颈动脉粥样硬化与多发腔隙性脑梗死的相关性分析[J].临床内科杂志,2016,33(7):454-457.
[3]王刚.MRI与CT在老年多发性脑梗死病人诊断中的临床结果比较[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2016,7(22):229.
[4]刘娟,陈巍.MRI与CT在老年多发性脑梗死患者诊断中的临床结果比较[J].医学信息,2016,29(6):310.
[5]金志文.用CT与MRI诊断老年多发性脑梗死患者的临床对比[J].中国医药指南,2017,15(8):177.
[6]李世学,张芳,孙艳霞.脑梗死后早期癫痫发作的临床特征及危险因素分析[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志,2016,19(14):60-61.
[7]翟洁敏,李会琪,何剑波.中青年与老年脑梗死危险因素和临床特点分析[J].陕西医学杂志,2016,45(8):1019-1021.
[8]王春芳,臧大维.前、后循环梗死危险因素及临床特征对比分析[J].医学理论与实践,2016,29(22):3026-3029.
[9]刘阿楠.急性脑梗死出血性转化的临床特征及危险因素分析[J].中国现代药物应用,2016,10(10):57-58.
[10]张春曜.MRI与CT在老年多发性脑梗死患者诊断中的临床结果比较[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2017,4(10):1913.