新媒体主体在科学事件评议中的问题与责任——以韩春雨撤稿事件网络评议为例
|
摘要
新媒体时代,公众不再满足于被科普的受众身份,他们对与自身利益相关的科学研究及成果,表现出强烈的参与意愿与浓厚的品评兴趣。然而囿于科学固有的学科特性,以及大众有限的科学素养和媒介素养,新媒体对科学事件的评议表现的既不够专业、也不够理性,不仅无益于解决科学争议,还会因此制造网络舆情。为此,首先,科学家应更多地参与科学传播,并以科学的方法引导科学事件的评议;其次,对于科学事件媒体需要恪守客观公正的原则去报道,而不是制造舆论吸引眼球;第三,公众参与科学也需要不断提升自身科学素养并理性包容地对待科学问题。
In the era of new media,the public is no longer satisfied with being an audience identity of popular science. They show strong willingness to participate and strong evaluation interest in the scientific research and achievements related to their own interests. However,confined to the inherent discipline characteristics of science,as well as the limited scientific and media literacy of the public,the new media is neither professional nor rational enough to comment on scientific events,which is not conducive to resolving the scientific controversy,but will also create the network public opinion. For this reason,firstly,the scientists should be more involved in the scientific communication,and guide the appraisal of scientific events in scientific methods. Secondly,the media should adhere to the principle of objectivity and impartiality to report scientific events,rather than creating public opinion to attract attention. Thirdly,the public participating in science also needs to constantly improve their own scientific literacy and treat the scientific issues rationally and tolerantly.
In the era of new media,the public is no longer satisfied with being an audience identity of popular science. They show strong willingness to participate and strong evaluation interest in the scientific research and achievements related to their own interests. However,confined to the inherent discipline characteristics of science,as well as the limited scientific and media literacy of the public,the new media is neither professional nor rational enough to comment on scientific events,which is not conducive to resolving the scientific controversy,but will also create the network public opinion. For this reason,firstly,the scientists should be more involved in the scientific communication,and guide the appraisal of scientific events in scientific methods. Secondly,the media should adhere to the principle of objectivity and impartiality to report scientific events,rather than creating public opinion to attract attention. Thirdly,the public participating in science also needs to constantly improve their own scientific literacy and treat the scientific issues rationally and tolerantly.
引文
[1]张加春.新媒体背景下科普的路径依赖与突破[J].科普研究,2016,11(4):18-26,44.
[2]高宏斌,王大鹏.全媒体视角下的韩春雨及其论文舆情[J].科学通报,2016,61(31):3292
[3]杨鹏,史丹梦.真伪博弈:微博空间的科学传播机制——以“谣言粉碎机”微博为例[J].新闻大学,2011(4):145-150.
[4]韩春雨撤稿怎么看?科学会“自净”定性别仓促[EB/OL].(2017-08-17)[2018-01-06]. http://news. 163. com/17/0807/14/CR8BP6DO00018AOQ. html.
[5]韩春雨论文被撤:发表不是科研成果的盖棺定论[EB/OL].(2017-08-22)[2017-12-26]. http://sh.qihoo. com/pc/detail? check=692db2110ca0b4a3&sign=360_e39369d1&url=http://zm. news. so. com/14b2cfb3492d47f008e6 8568debf2703.
[6]苗伟山,贾鹤鹏.科学传播:化解现实争议及其研究前景——科学传播热点对谈录[J].新闻记者,2016(12):. 44-51.
[7]王大鹏,钟琦,贾鹤鹏.科学传播:从科普到公众参与科学——由崔永元卢大儒转基因辩论引发的思考[J].新闻记者,2015(6):8-14.
[8]韩春雨《自然——生物技术》撤稿追踪[EB/OL].(2017-08-04)[2017-12-13]. http://news. china. com/domestic/945/20170804/310344 70_2. html.
[9]魏峰.浅谈新媒体时代的科学传播[J].现代传播(中国传媒大学学报),2013,35(9):159-160.
[10]申宸.我国科学家的科学传播素养:概念、现状与提升[J].新闻传播,2016(24):4-6.
[11]张新庆.韩春雨主动撤稿的两则警示[J].科技导报,2017,35(16):12.
[12]中国科协发布第九次中国公民科学素质调查结果[EB/OL].(2015-09-19)[2018-01-23]. http://education. news. cn/2015-09/19/c_128247007. html.
[13]刘青,施威.新媒介环境下科学传播的困境及对策研究[J].中国集体经济,2017(7):103-104.
[14]北科社评:从韩春雨撤稿事件看科学研究的“可重复性”有多重要[EB/OL].(2017-08-04)[2018-01-03]. http://www. toutiao.com/i6450222098739626509/.
[2]高宏斌,王大鹏.全媒体视角下的韩春雨及其论文舆情[J].科学通报,2016,61(31):3292
[3]杨鹏,史丹梦.真伪博弈:微博空间的科学传播机制——以“谣言粉碎机”微博为例[J].新闻大学,2011(4):145-150.
[4]韩春雨撤稿怎么看?科学会“自净”定性别仓促[EB/OL].(2017-08-17)[2018-01-06]. http://news. 163. com/17/0807/14/CR8BP6DO00018AOQ. html.
[5]韩春雨论文被撤:发表不是科研成果的盖棺定论[EB/OL].(2017-08-22)[2017-12-26]. http://sh.qihoo. com/pc/detail? check=692db2110ca0b4a3&sign=360_e39369d1&url=http://zm. news. so. com/14b2cfb3492d47f008e6 8568debf2703.
[6]苗伟山,贾鹤鹏.科学传播:化解现实争议及其研究前景——科学传播热点对谈录[J].新闻记者,2016(12):. 44-51.
[7]王大鹏,钟琦,贾鹤鹏.科学传播:从科普到公众参与科学——由崔永元卢大儒转基因辩论引发的思考[J].新闻记者,2015(6):8-14.
[8]韩春雨《自然——生物技术》撤稿追踪[EB/OL].(2017-08-04)[2017-12-13]. http://news. china. com/domestic/945/20170804/310344 70_2. html.
[9]魏峰.浅谈新媒体时代的科学传播[J].现代传播(中国传媒大学学报),2013,35(9):159-160.
[10]申宸.我国科学家的科学传播素养:概念、现状与提升[J].新闻传播,2016(24):4-6.
[11]张新庆.韩春雨主动撤稿的两则警示[J].科技导报,2017,35(16):12.
[12]中国科协发布第九次中国公民科学素质调查结果[EB/OL].(2015-09-19)[2018-01-23]. http://education. news. cn/2015-09/19/c_128247007. html.
[13]刘青,施威.新媒介环境下科学传播的困境及对策研究[J].中国集体经济,2017(7):103-104.
[14]北科社评:从韩春雨撤稿事件看科学研究的“可重复性”有多重要[EB/OL].(2017-08-04)[2018-01-03]. http://www. toutiao.com/i6450222098739626509/.