《肿瘤预防与治疗》杂志415篇初审退稿稿件分析
|
摘要
目的:了解《肿瘤预防与治疗》杂志初审退稿情况,分析退稿原因,指导作者科学写作,提高稿件质量,增加稿件发表率。方法:纳入《肿瘤预防与治疗》杂志2017年启用JournalX投稿系统以来初审退稿的稿件,并统计其退稿周期、第一作者单位级别、稿件类型和退稿原因。结果:初审退稿稿件共计415篇,初审退稿率71. 55%;退稿周期0～91日,平均5. 35日;有基金支持的稿件62篇; 7日和7日以内退稿的稿件有357篇(86. 02%)。大多数退稿稿件来源于三级医院,共339篇(81. 69%);退稿数量最多的稿件类型为临床研究,共263篇(63. 37%)。最常见的退稿原因为质量未达到标准,共218篇(52. 53%),其次为重复率过高(25. 30%)和疑似代写代投(15. 91%)。结论:稿件质量不高仍是当前期刊最突出的问题,但重复率过高和代写代投问题也不容忽视。作者应恪守职业道德,认真撰写论文,以期提高稿件接受率。
Journal of Cancer Control and Treatment( JCCT) is an open access journal devoted to oncology science. From2019,JCCT will upgrade from a bi-monthly publication to a monthly publication. In order to provide guidance for authors,we included the manuscripts submitted to JCCT via Journal X system,and analyzed the manuscripts rejected after preliminary review. In total,580 papers submitted to JCCT were analyzed,415( 71. 55%) of which were rejected after preliminary review. The average period of rejection was 5. 35 days( 0 ～ 91 days),and 357( 86. 02%) papers were rejected within 7 days. Most rejected papers came from tertiary hospitals( 339/415),and the most common type of rejected papers was clinical research( 263/415). Meanwhile,the most common reason for rejection was quality unsatisfied( 218/415),while repetition rate > 15% and ghost manuscripts came second and third. In conclusion,the most obtrusive problems of papers submitted to JCCT are quality unsatisfied and repetition rate > 15%. Meanwhile,JCCT is also haunted by ghost manuscript. In order to improve the quality of the manuscripts,authors of JCCT should learn how to draft manuscripts,improve their writing skills,and explore the latest progress on oncology.
Journal of Cancer Control and Treatment( JCCT) is an open access journal devoted to oncology science. From2019,JCCT will upgrade from a bi-monthly publication to a monthly publication. In order to provide guidance for authors,we included the manuscripts submitted to JCCT via Journal X system,and analyzed the manuscripts rejected after preliminary review. In total,580 papers submitted to JCCT were analyzed,415( 71. 55%) of which were rejected after preliminary review. The average period of rejection was 5. 35 days( 0 ～ 91 days),and 357( 86. 02%) papers were rejected within 7 days. Most rejected papers came from tertiary hospitals( 339/415),and the most common type of rejected papers was clinical research( 263/415). Meanwhile,the most common reason for rejection was quality unsatisfied( 218/415),while repetition rate > 15% and ghost manuscripts came second and third. In conclusion,the most obtrusive problems of papers submitted to JCCT are quality unsatisfied and repetition rate > 15%. Meanwhile,JCCT is also haunted by ghost manuscript. In order to improve the quality of the manuscripts,authors of JCCT should learn how to draft manuscripts,improve their writing skills,and explore the latest progress on oncology.
引文
[1]刘晓燕,徐晓芹,李春花.加强责任编辑的初审退修工作[J].编辑学报,2017,29(S2)∶S42-44.
[2]叶文娟,余茜,杜新征.初审在科技期刊编辑工作中的重要性-以《水生生物学报》为例[J]。编辑学报,2016,28(S1)∶S101-103.
[3]龙静,孙云志.运用数据分析方法缩短科技期刊论文发表周期[J].中国科技期刊研究,2016,27(4)∶363.
[4]陈子郁,李雪华,唐银星.《华南国防医学杂志》退稿分析[J].华南国防医学杂志,2017,31(1)∶58-61.
[5]韩翠娥.改进和完善审稿制度,保证期刊的学术质量[J].编辑学报,2016,28(S1):S34-35.
[6]钟羡芳.论学位论文析出内容能否在期刊再发表[J].科技与出版,2014,33(7)∶123-127.
[7]王雁,苟莉,刘丹,等.代写代投来稿的甄别及防范措施[J].编辑学报,2018,32(2)∶171-173.
[8]王炎龙,任雪瑶.我国科技期刊发展障碍及驱动力突破[J].中国科技期刊研究,2018,29(6)∶541-545.
[9]周芳.《新疆医科大学学报》常见退稿原因分析[J].新疆医科大学学报,2016,39(7)∶922-934.
[10]郭玉慧,周静,侯维娟,等.《中国微侵袭神经外科杂志》退稿原因分析及建议[J].中国微侵袭神经外科杂志,2017,22(10)∶477-480.
[11]张海燕,张和,鲁翠涛.《肝胆胰外科杂志》来稿中常见的学术不端问题[J].肝胆胰外科杂志,2015,7(4)∶351-353.
[12]张海燕,张和,鲁翠涛.作者基本信息在稿件真实性审查中的应用[J].编辑学报,2017,29(2)∶168-171.
[13]朱银周.刻意规避学术不端软件检测论文的再审查[J].编辑学报,2015,27(3)∶249-251.
[14]胡金富,史玉民.国外学术期刊同行评审造假的分析及启示-基于2015年三次大撤稿事件的分析[J].中国科学基金,2016(6)∶568-571.
[15]苟兰英,高红飞,韩解非,等.2013年临床肿瘤学重大进展-美国临床肿瘤学会年度报告[J].循证医学,2014,14(1)∶4-29.
[2]叶文娟,余茜,杜新征.初审在科技期刊编辑工作中的重要性-以《水生生物学报》为例[J]。编辑学报,2016,28(S1)∶S101-103.
[3]龙静,孙云志.运用数据分析方法缩短科技期刊论文发表周期[J].中国科技期刊研究,2016,27(4)∶363.
[4]陈子郁,李雪华,唐银星.《华南国防医学杂志》退稿分析[J].华南国防医学杂志,2017,31(1)∶58-61.
[5]韩翠娥.改进和完善审稿制度,保证期刊的学术质量[J].编辑学报,2016,28(S1):S34-35.
[6]钟羡芳.论学位论文析出内容能否在期刊再发表[J].科技与出版,2014,33(7)∶123-127.
[7]王雁,苟莉,刘丹,等.代写代投来稿的甄别及防范措施[J].编辑学报,2018,32(2)∶171-173.
[8]王炎龙,任雪瑶.我国科技期刊发展障碍及驱动力突破[J].中国科技期刊研究,2018,29(6)∶541-545.
[9]周芳.《新疆医科大学学报》常见退稿原因分析[J].新疆医科大学学报,2016,39(7)∶922-934.
[10]郭玉慧,周静,侯维娟,等.《中国微侵袭神经外科杂志》退稿原因分析及建议[J].中国微侵袭神经外科杂志,2017,22(10)∶477-480.
[11]张海燕,张和,鲁翠涛.《肝胆胰外科杂志》来稿中常见的学术不端问题[J].肝胆胰外科杂志,2015,7(4)∶351-353.
[12]张海燕,张和,鲁翠涛.作者基本信息在稿件真实性审查中的应用[J].编辑学报,2017,29(2)∶168-171.
[13]朱银周.刻意规避学术不端软件检测论文的再审查[J].编辑学报,2015,27(3)∶249-251.
[14]胡金富,史玉民.国外学术期刊同行评审造假的分析及启示-基于2015年三次大撤稿事件的分析[J].中国科学基金,2016(6)∶568-571.
[15]苟兰英,高红飞,韩解非,等.2013年临床肿瘤学重大进展-美国临床肿瘤学会年度报告[J].循证医学,2014,14(1)∶4-29.