美舰载无人机MQ-25航母适配性研究
|
摘要
美国国防部联合需求审查委员会批准确认了航母舰载无人机系统(MQ-25)的项目需求,该项目明确了2个技术需求:航母适配性和空中加油。本文介绍MQ-25项目的基本情况,并分析美国海军在MQ-25项目中的采办策略。
The Joint Requirements Oversight Council(JROC) authorized the requirement of aircraft carrier ship-borne unmanned aerial vehicle(MQ-25) system program, which confirmed two technical requirements: aircraft carrier adaptability and air refueling. The fundamental condition of MQ-25 program is introduced in this paper, and the acquisition strategy of U.S. navy is analyzed as well.
The Joint Requirements Oversight Council(JROC) authorized the requirement of aircraft carrier ship-borne unmanned aerial vehicle(MQ-25) system program, which confirmed two technical requirements: aircraft carrier adaptability and air refueling. The fundamental condition of MQ-25 program is introduced in this paper, and the acquisition strategy of U.S. navy is analyzed as well.
引文
[1]GAO.Unmanned carrier-based aircraft system:debate over systems role led to focus on aerial refueling,GAO-16-389[R].Washington,D.C.:March,2016.
[2]张鑫博,谢文娇.UCLASS项目的性能指标演化过程[J].国际航空,2014(4):40-41.ZHANG Xinbo,XIE Wenjiao.The evolution of UCLASSRequirements[J].International Avia-tion,2014(4):40-41.
[3]王钱生.航母适配性的基本设计要求[J].飞机设计,2006(2):32-35.WANG Qiansheng.Fundamental design require-ments for adaption to aircraft carriers[J].Air-craft Design,2006(2):32-35.
[4]王瑞,王伟,王鹏.无人机空中加油建模与仿真分析[J].计算机测量与控制,2011,19(1):142-144.WANG Rui,WANG Wei,WANG Peng.Modeling and Simulation for Aerial Refueling of UAV[J].Computer Measurement&Control,2011,19(1):142-144.
[5]GAO.GAO analysis of Navy data(data and im-ages),GAO-17-647[R].Washington,D.C.:Sep-tember,2017.
[6]GAO.GAO analysis of department of Defense data,GAO-17-647[R].Washington,D.C.:Sep-tember,2017.
[7]GAO.GAO analysis of department of Defense policy,GAO-17-647[R].Washington,D.C.:Sep-tember,2017.
[8]A major defense acquisition program may not receive approval for development start until the milestone decision authority considers an inde-pendent cost estimate for the program.10 U.S.C.2334(b)(1)(B).
[9]A major defense acquisition program may not receive approval for development start until the milestone decision authority certifies that the technology in the program has been demonstrated in a relevant environment.10 U.S.C.2366b(a)(2).
[10]GAO.Assessments of Selected Weapon Programs.GAO-17-333SP[R].Washington,D.C.:March,2017.
[11]GAO.Major Weapon systems continue to expe-rience cost and schedule problems under DOD′s revised policy.GAO-06-368[R].Washington,D.C.:June,2006.
[12]GAO.Capturing design and manufacturing knowledge early improves acquisition Out-comes,GAO-02-701[R].Washington,D.C.:July,2002.
[13]GAO.Better matching of needs and resources will lead to better weapon system outcomes.GAO-01-288[R].Washington,D.C.:March,2001.
[14]GAO.Weapon systems:prototyping has bene-fited acquisition programs,but more can be done to support innovation initiatives,GAO-17-309[R].Washington,D.C.:June,2017.
[2]张鑫博,谢文娇.UCLASS项目的性能指标演化过程[J].国际航空,2014(4):40-41.ZHANG Xinbo,XIE Wenjiao.The evolution of UCLASSRequirements[J].International Avia-tion,2014(4):40-41.
[3]王钱生.航母适配性的基本设计要求[J].飞机设计,2006(2):32-35.WANG Qiansheng.Fundamental design require-ments for adaption to aircraft carriers[J].Air-craft Design,2006(2):32-35.
[4]王瑞,王伟,王鹏.无人机空中加油建模与仿真分析[J].计算机测量与控制,2011,19(1):142-144.WANG Rui,WANG Wei,WANG Peng.Modeling and Simulation for Aerial Refueling of UAV[J].Computer Measurement&Control,2011,19(1):142-144.
[5]GAO.GAO analysis of Navy data(data and im-ages),GAO-17-647[R].Washington,D.C.:Sep-tember,2017.
[6]GAO.GAO analysis of department of Defense data,GAO-17-647[R].Washington,D.C.:Sep-tember,2017.
[7]GAO.GAO analysis of department of Defense policy,GAO-17-647[R].Washington,D.C.:Sep-tember,2017.
[8]A major defense acquisition program may not receive approval for development start until the milestone decision authority considers an inde-pendent cost estimate for the program.10 U.S.C.2334(b)(1)(B).
[9]A major defense acquisition program may not receive approval for development start until the milestone decision authority certifies that the technology in the program has been demonstrated in a relevant environment.10 U.S.C.2366b(a)(2).
[10]GAO.Assessments of Selected Weapon Programs.GAO-17-333SP[R].Washington,D.C.:March,2017.
[11]GAO.Major Weapon systems continue to expe-rience cost and schedule problems under DOD′s revised policy.GAO-06-368[R].Washington,D.C.:June,2006.
[12]GAO.Capturing design and manufacturing knowledge early improves acquisition Out-comes,GAO-02-701[R].Washington,D.C.:July,2002.
[13]GAO.Better matching of needs and resources will lead to better weapon system outcomes.GAO-01-288[R].Washington,D.C.:March,2001.
[14]GAO.Weapon systems:prototyping has bene-fited acquisition programs,but more can be done to support innovation initiatives,GAO-17-309[R].Washington,D.C.:June,2017.