基于风险的地质环境承载力评价
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Research on the evaluation of the carrying capacity of geological environment based on its risk level
  • 作者:张茂省 ; 王尧
  • 英文作者:ZHANG Maosheng;WANG Yao;Xi'an Center of China Geological Survey;Development and Research Center,China Geological Survey;
  • 关键词:承载力 ; 评价原理 ; 技术方法 ; 地质环境 ; 风险管理
  • 英文关键词:carrying capacity;;principle of assessment;;technical method;;geological environment;;risk management
  • 中文刊名:ZQYD
  • 英文刊名:Geological Bulletin of China
  • 机构:中国地质调查局西安地质调查中心;中国地质调查局发展研究中心;
  • 出版日期:2018-03-15
  • 出版单位:地质通报
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.37;No.273,No.274
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金项目《黄土水敏性力学机制及其致滑机理》(批准号:41530460)、《基于风险的地质环境承载力评价研究》(批准号:41641011);; 中国地质调查局项目《地质调查发展路线图与管理政策研究》(编号:DDT20160087)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:ZQYD2018Z1025
  • 页数:9
  • CN:Z1
  • ISSN:11-4648/P
  • 分类号:307-315
摘要
资源环境承载力是国民经济和社会发展规划中必须考虑的基本要素之一。科学地量化评估资源环境承载力已成为多个领域交叉研究的前沿课题,资源环境承载力的概念、评价原理、评价方法、评判标准等基本问题尚有待深入研究。通过引入风险管理的理念,基于风险理论、国土空间三生功能理论、地质环境理论、边际分析理论等交叉融合,开展基于风险的地质环境承载力理论与技术方法探讨。以人类活动带来的生命、财产和健康风险是否可接受及接受程度为切入点和判别标准,提出基于风险的地质环境容许承载力和极限承载力概念,将承载力状态判别为安全承载、容许超载和不可接受超载3个等级,发展地质环境承载力理论。构建地质环境承载力评价流程和评价技术方法,包括确定研究范围、识别地质环境问题、基于生命风险、财产风险和健康风险分析的地质环境承载力单因素评价、承载力综合评价等。探索确定地质环境承载力评价阈值。为地质环境承载力评价提供新的理论与关键技术,为国土空间开发"三条红线"划定提供依据。
        The carrying capacity of resources and environment is a key element which needs to be considered in economic and social development planning. Quantitative assessment of it has become one of the frontiers of earth science research. The concept, principle,method and criteria of carrying capacity assessment need to be explored further. In this paper, the authors established a new theory and some key techniques to assess the carrying capacity of geological environment, using multi-disciplinary approaches based on risk theory, functional theories of production-life-ecology, geological environmental theory, marginal theory and some other means. On the basis of the risk theory and with the prerequisite that if the life, property and health risk which originate from human activities such as producing and livelihood can be accepted as an entry point and link, the authors proposed the concept of allowable and ultimate carrying capacity, and classified the status of carrying capacity into three levels: safely carrying, allowable over-carrying and unacceptable over-carrying. Risk-based evaluation of the geological environment carrying capacity generally includes four steps: determination of the scope of the research; identification of the environmental geological problems; evaluation of the individual factors related to life,property and health risks; integrating the individual factor evaluations into a comprehensive evaluation of the current and predicted carrying capacities. This approach can support the decision making on identifying the"three red lines"of national terrestrial development.
引文
[1]张茂省,黎志恒,孙萍萍,等.舟曲三眼峪“8·8”特大泥石流灾害特征与风险减缓对策[J].西北地质,2011,44(3):10-20.
    [2]刘金阔.基于生态足迹的县域土地承载力研究——以乌海市海南区为例[D].内蒙古师范大学,2013.
    [3]Barrett G W,Odum E P.Editorial:From the President:Integrative Science[J].Bioscience,1998,48(12):980-980.
    [4]Willem VV.Sustainable development,global restructuring and immigrant housing[J].Habitat International,1996,20(3):349-358.
    [5]Higgins G M,Kassam A H,Naiken L,et al,Potential Population Supporting Capacities o f Lands in the Developing World[M].Rome:FAO,1985:23-27.
    [6]Khanna P,Babu P R,Georgej M S.Carrying-capacity as a basis for sustainable development a case study of National Capital Region in India[J].Progress in Planning,1999,52(2):101-166.
    [7]William E R.Eeological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity:what urban economics leaves out[J].Environment and Urbanization,1992,4(2):121-130.
    [8]Lane M.The carrying capacity imperative:Assessing regional carrying capacity methodologies for sustainable land-use planning[J].Land Use Policy,2010,27(4):1038-1045.
    [9]Wackernagel M,Rees W E.Perceptual and Structural Barriers to Investing in Natural Capital:Economics From an Ecological Footprint Perspective[J].Ecological Economics,1997,20(1):3-24.
    [10]高鹭,张宏业.生态承载力的国内外研究进展[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2007,17(2):19-26.
    [11]朱一中,夏军,谈戈.关于水资源承载力理论与方法的研究[J].地理科学进展,2002,2:180-188.
    [12]夏军,唐青蔚.西北地区水资源合理配置和承载能力分析[J].中国科学院院刊,2005,4:288-292.
    [13]武占云.“三生”空间优化及京津冀生态环境保护[J].城市,2014,12:26-29.
    [14]傅世锋,张平,蒋金龙.基于开发区规划环评的土地资源承载力评价[J].应用生态学报,2012,2:459-467.
    [15]廖强,刘得俊,邓勇.格尔木区地下水资源承载力评价与对策研究[J].水资源开发与管理,2015,4:27-31.
    [16]杨喆,程灿,谭雪,等.基于水质和水量视角下的水环境承载力研究——以高淳固城湖流域为例[J].环境保护科学,2016,1:1-7.
    [17]杨森林,王恩斌.贵州矿山地质环境承载力分区初探[J].能源与环境,2014,5:54-56.
    [18]熊建新,陈端吕,谢雪梅.基于状态空间法的洞庭湖区生态承载力综合评价研究[J].经济地理,2012,11:138-142.
    [19]王奎峰,韩祥银,张太平.山东半岛地质环境承载力评价指标体系构建及应用研究[J].环境污染与防治,2015,9:29-33,38.
    [20]刘凯,任建兰,程钰,等.中国城镇化的资源环境承载力响应演变与驱动因素[J].城市发展研究,2016,1:27-33.
    [21]Ye Zhiping,Meng Lihong.Evaluation of Environmental Carrying Capacity of Water Resources in Jiangxi Province[J].Agricultural Science&Technology,2015,12:2849-2853.
    [22]王中根,夏军.区域生态环境承载力的量化方法研究[J].长江职工大学学报,1999,4:9-12.
    [23]李金海.区域生态承载力与可持续发展[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2001,3:78-80.
    [24]叶文,王会肖,许新宜,等.资源环境承载力定量分析——以秦巴山水源涵养区为例[J].中国生态农业学报,2015,8:1061-1072.
    [25]黄敬军,姜素,张丽,等.城市规划区资源环境承载力评价指标体系构建——以徐州市为例[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2015,S2:204-208.
    [26]龚波,肖国安,张四梅.基于灰色系统理论的湖南粮食产量预测研究[J].湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版),2012,(5).
    [27]周永生,肖玉欢等.基于多元线性回归的广西粮食产量预测[J].南方农业学报,2011,42(9):1165-1167.
    [28]方创琳,鲍超,张传国.干旱地区生态-生产-生活承载力变化情势与演变情景分析[J].生态学报,2003,9:1915-1923.
    [29]翟羽佳,王丽婧,郑丙辉,等.基于系统仿真模拟的三峡库区生态承载力分区动态评价[J].环境科学研究,2015,4:559-567.
    [30]刘玉娟,刘邵权,刘斌涛,等.汶川地震重灾区雅安市资源环境承载力[J].长江流域资源与环境,2010,5:554-559.
    [31]姚治华,王红旗,郝旭光.基于集对分析的地质环境承载力研究——以大庆市为例[J].环境科学与技术,2010,10:183-189.
    [32]郭轲,王立群.京津冀地区资源环境承载力动态变化及其驱动因子[J].应用生态学报,2015,12:3818-3826.
    [33]王金南,于雷,万军,等.长江三角洲地区城市水环境承载力评估[J].中国环境科学,2013,6:1147-1151.
    [34]张小刚,罗雅.长株潭城市群资源环境承载力评价及改善措施研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报(社会科学版),2015,3:34-39.
    [35]陶洁,左其亭,齐登红,等.中原城市群水资源承载力计算及分析[J].水资源与水工程学报,2011,6:56-61.
    [36]曾浩,邱烨,李小帆.基于动态因子法和ESDA的资源环境承载力时空差异研究——以武汉城市圈为例[J].宁夏大学学报(人文社会科学版),2015,37(1):153-161.
    [37]李强,刘蕾.基于要素指数法的皖江城市带土地资源承载力评价[J].地理与地理信息科学,2014,01:56-59.
    [38]任光远,薛忠歧.基于GIS技术的生态地质环境承载力研究——以宁夏沿黄经济区为例[J].城市地质,2014,2:39-42.
    [39]董延涌.辽宁沿海经济带资源环境承载力问题研究[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报(社会科学版),2011,5:467-469.
    [40]汪霞,张洋洋,怡欣,等.基于生态足迹模型的舟曲县生态承载力空间差异[J].兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2014,5:687-691.
    [41]彭文英,刘念北.首都圈人口空间分布优化策略——基于土地资源承载力估测[J].地理科学,2015,5:558-564.
    [42]顾康康,储金龙,汪勇政.基于遥感的煤炭型矿业城市土地利用与生态承载力时空变化分析[J].生态学报,2014,20:5714-5720.
    [43]乔盛,白宏涛,张稚妍,等.生态导向的城市发展土地资源承载力评价研究[J].生态经济,2011,7:33-37.
    [44]屈吉鸿,石红旺,梁奇,等.灌区地下水承载力风险评价[J].华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版),2014,4:13-18.
    [45]李瑞,张飞,周梅,等.干旱区水资源承载力研究现状与进展[J].天津农业科学,2016,1:18-22.
    [46]宫凡荔,付强,姜秋香,等.三江平原水资源承载力的泛系观控与风险评估[J].南水北调与水利科技,2014,3:1-4,9.
    [47]赵兵.岷江上游流域水资源承载能力演变分析[J].贵州社会科学,2015,9:138-143.
    [48]Fell R,Corominas J,Bonnard C,et al.Guidelines for landslide susceptibility,hazard and risk zoning for land use planning[J].Engineering Geology,2008,102(3/4):85-98.
    [49]AGS.A national landslide risk management framework for Australia,Australian geomechanics society[J].Australian Geomechanics,2007,42(1):1-12.
    [50]Interior U S D ot,Survey USG.The U.S.Geological survey landslide hazards program 5-Year Plan 2006-2010[R].2006.
    [51]Tagliavini F,Mantovani M,Marcato G,et al.Validation of landslide hazard assessment by means of GPS monitoring technique—a case study in the Dolomites(Eastern Alps,Italy)[J].Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences,2007,7:185-193.
    [52]PGeo R G,Ph D M J,PEng P M,et al.Guidelines for legislated landslide assessments for proposed residential development in British Columbia[S].British Columbia,2006.
    [53]石菊松,石玲,吴树仁,等.滑坡风险评估实践中的难点与对策[J].地质通报,2009,08:1020-1030.
    [54]吴树仁,石菊松,王涛.突发地质灾害预测评价概论[J].地质通报,2008,21(11):1753-1763.
    [55]唐亚明,张茂省,李政国,等.国内外地质灾害风险管理对比及评述[J].西北地质,2015,2:238-246.
    [56]刘传正,张明霞,刘艳辉.区域地质环境可持续利用评价体系初步研究[J].地学前缘,2006,1:242-245.
    [57]张茂省,唐亚明.地质灾害风险调查的方法与实践[J].地质通报,2008,27(8):1205-1216.
    [58]李红英,谭跃虎.滑坡灾害风险可接受准则计算模型研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2013,S2:2047-2052.
    [59]吴树仁,石菊松,张春山,等.地质灾害风险评估技术指南初论[J].地质通报,2009,28(8):995-1005.
    [60]刘希林,陈宜娟.泥石流风险区划方法及其应用——以四川西部地区为例[J].地理科学,2010,4:558-565.
    [61]张茂省,李林,唐亚明,等.基于风险理念的黄土滑坡调查与编图研究[J].工程地质学报,2011,1:43-51.
    [62]王春山,巴仁基,周洪福,等.草科-田湾泥石流风险性评价[J].西北林学院学报,2015,4:210-216.
    [63]ERM-Hong Kong L.GEO Report No.75 Landslides and Boulder Falls from Natural Terrain:Interim Risk Guidelines[M].Hong Kong:Geotechnical Engineering Office,1998:1-183.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700