2017年四川九寨沟M_s7.0地震的地震学特征
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Seismologic characteristics of the 2017, M_s7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake, Sichuan, China
  • 作者:安艳茹 ; 苏金蓉 ; 薛艳 ; 张莹莹 ; 白兰淑 ; 刘杰 ; 何少林 ; 杨志高 ; 杜广宝 ; 魏娅玲 ; 吴微微 ; 黄春梅 ; 潘颖
  • 英文作者:Yanru An;Jinrong Su;Yan Xue;Yingying Zhang;Lanshu Bai;Jie Liu;Shaolin He;Zhigao Yang;Guangbao Du;Yaling Wei;Weiwei Wu;Chunmei Huang;Ying Pan;China Earthquake Networks Center;Institute of Geophysics China Earthquake Administration;Earthquake Administration of Sichuan Province;Earthquake Administration of Jiangsu Province;
  • 关键词:九寨沟Ms7.0地震 ; 地震震源机制 ; 余震精定位 ; 峰值加速度 ; 虎牙断裂 ; 库仑应力触发 ; 汶川地震
  • 英文关键词:Ms7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake;;focal mechanism;;aftershock relocation;;peak acceleration;;Huya fault;;Coulomb stress triggering;;Wenchuan earthquake
  • 中文刊名:KXTB
  • 英文刊名:Chinese Science Bulletin
  • 机构:中国地震台网中心;中国地震局地球物理研究所;四川省地震局;江苏省地震局;
  • 出版日期:2018-03-10
  • 出版单位:科学通报
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.63
  • 基金:中国地震局地震科技星火计划(XH17048);中国地震局地震行业科研专项(201508012)资助
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:KXTB201807008
  • 页数:13
  • CN:07
  • ISSN:11-1784/N
  • 分类号:70-82
摘要
2017年九寨沟M_s7.0地震位于巴颜喀喇地块东边界带附近的虎牙断裂NNW方向的延长线上,震源深度20km,震源机制解为左旋走滑型,矩震级为M_w6.5.震后6 d内共记录到3000多次余震,最大震级为M4.8,余震活动强度偏低但衰减正常.主震位于余震区中部,为双侧破裂.余震区呈NNW向线性分布,断层面近乎直立,长度超过30 km,破裂宽度约15 km.余震区中部、东南部余震的震源机制大多与主震震源机制一致,而西北部余震的震源机制均为逆冲型,可能与岷江断裂有关.余震区中部、东南部的应力也较西北部释放充分.九寨沟地震最大烈度为9度,记录的峰值加速度值NS向最大,EW向次之,垂直向最小,最近的强震台是九寨百河台,其加速度反应谱低于九寨沟地区的8度设防烈度.静态库仑应力研究表明,汶川地震对九寨沟地震具有较明显的触发作用.沿虎牙断裂发生的1973年松潘东北M_s6.5地震,1976年松潘M_s7.2地震和本次九寨沟地震的余震区沿NNW方向相连.结合主震破裂位移分布、余震的震源机制及应力降分析认为,九寨沟地震余震区中部、东南部发生强余震的危险性不大,但需注意余震区西北部及岷江断裂地震活动的发展.
        The M_s7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake with the hypocenter depth of 20 km occurred at the NNW extension line of the Huya fault located next to the eastern boundary of the Bayan Har block. The focal mechanism solution of the mainshock based on the W-phase source inversion showed a sinistral slip and the moment magnitude was M_w6.5. Over 3000 aftershocks were recorded within six days, among which the largest was M4.8 and three others were larger than M4.0. The value of the aftershock frequency attenuation coefficient P was 1.03, and the b value of the magnitude-frequency relationship was 0.68. The aftershock activities were relatively inactive but the attenuation was normal. Relocation results of 603 aftershocks were obtained by using the double-difference earthquake location algorithm and the location errors of the EW, NS and the vertical directions were 0.81, 0.84 and 1.59 km respectively. The mainshock occurred in the center of the aftershock region and ruptured on both sides along the strike direction. The aftershocks were distributed linearly along a NNW direction, and the fault plane was nearly vertical with a length over 30 km and a width of about 15 km. Aftershocks were more concentrated in the southeast than in the northwest. The focal mechanism solutions of most aftershocks in the central and southeastern regions were consistent with the mainshock, while those in the northwest were thrust-types, which might be related to the Minjiang fault. Meanwhile, the regional stress was released more in the central and southeastern regions than in the northwest. The maximum intensity investigated in the damage zone was up to IX. The maximum intensity region was located in scenic areas, therefore few people were present when the earthquake occurred at night. The peak acceleration was highest in the NS records, followed by the EW and vertical records. The design spectra of intensity for Jiuzhaigou was Ⅷ, which is higher than the acceleration response spectra obtained from the Jiuzhaibaihe station, the nearest station which had strong motion recordings. These aforementioned factors may have contributed to the minor casualties resulting from this earthquake. The aftershock regions of the Jiuzhaigou earthquake, the 1973 M_s6.5 Songpan northeast earthquake, and the 1976 M_s7.2 Songpan earthquake are connected along the Huya fault which may extend to the northwest in the deep earth. Considering the rupture displacement distribution of the mainshock, the focal mechanism of aftershocks, and the stress drop, strong aftershocks are unlikely to occur in the central and southeastern Jiuzhaigou aftershock regions; however, the development of seismicity in the northwest and the Minjiang River fault should be noted. Static Coulomb stress triggering of other 4 earthquakes larger than M6.5 occurred near the Ganqingchuan border were calculated using the Coulomb 3.3 software. The results indicated that the Jiuzhaigou earthquake was triggered by the Wenchuan earthquake and related to the stress adjustment in the study area.
引文
1 Earthquake Prevention and Defense Department of National Earthquake Administration.Catalogue of Strong Earthquakes in Chinese History:Twenty-third Century BC-1911(in Chinese).Beijing:Seismological Press,1995[国家地震局震害防御司.中国历史强震目录:公元前23世纪―公元1911年.北京:地震出版社,1995]
    2 Earthquake Prevention and Defense Department of China Earthquake Administration.Catalogue of Chinese Earthquakes 1912-1990,Ms≥4.7(in Chinese).Beijing:China Science and Technology Press,1999[中国地震局震害防御司.中国近代地震目录:公元1912年~1990年,Ms≥4.7.北京:中国科学技术出版社,1999]
    3 Xu X W,Wen X Z,Ye J Q,et al.The Ms8.0 Wenchuan earthquake surface ruptures and its seismogenic structure(in Chinese).Seismol Geol,2008,30:597-629[徐锡伟,闻学泽,叶建青,等.汶川Ms8.0地震地表破裂带及其发震构造.地震地质,2008,30:597-629]
    4 Niu Z J,Wang M,Sunh R,et al.Contemporary velocity field of crustal movement of Chinese mainland from Global Positioning System measurements.Chin Sci Bull,2005,50:939-941
    5 Zhang P Z,Xu X W,Wen X Z,et al.Slip rates and recurrence intervals of the Longmen Shan active fault zone,and tectonic implications for the mechanism of the May 12 Wenchuan earthquake,Sichuan,China(in Chinese).Chin J Geophys,2008,51:1066-1073[张培震,徐锡伟,闻学泽,等.2008年汶川8.0级地震发震断裂的滑动速率、复发周期和构造成因.地球物理学报,2008,51:1066-1073]
    6 Chen L C,Ran Y K,Wang H,et al.The Lushan Ms7.0 earthquake and activity of the southern segment of the Longmenshan fault zone(in Chinese).Chin Sci Bull,2013,58:1925-1932[陈立春,冉勇康,王虎,等.芦山地震与龙门山断裂带南段活动性.科学通报,2013,58:1925-1932]
    7 Chen G G,Ji F J,Zhou R J,et al.Primary research of activity segmentation of Longmenshan fault zone since Late Quaternary(in Chinese).Seismol Geol,2007,29:657-673[陈国光,计凤桔,周荣军,等.龙门山断裂带晚第四纪活动性分段的初步研究.地震地质,2007,29:657-673]
    8 Zhang J L,Ren J W,Fu J D,et al.Earthquake rupture features and tectonics significance of the Tazang fault in the eastern part of the east Kunlun fault zones(in Chinese).Earthquake,2012,32:1-16[张军龙,任金卫,付俊东,等.东昆仑断裂带东部塔藏断裂地震地表破裂特征及其构造意义.地震,2012,32:1-16]
    9 Qian H,Zhou R J,Ma S H,et al.South segment of Minjiang fault and Diexi earthquake in 1933(in Chinese).Earthq Res China,1999,15:333-338[钱洪,周荣军,马声浩,等.岷江断裂南段与1933年叠溪地震研究.中国地震,1999,15:333-338]
    10 Zhao X L,Deng Q D,Chen S F.Tectonic geomorphology of the Minshan uplift in western Sichuan,Southwestern China(in Chinese).Seismol Geol,1994,16:429-439[赵小麟,邓起东,陈社发.岷山隆起的构造地貌学研究.地震地质,1994,16:429-439]
    11 Deng Q D.Maps of Active Tetonics of China(in Chinese).Beijing:Seismological Press,2007[邓起东.中国活动构造图.北京:地震出版社,2007]
    12 Cesca S,Heimann S,Stammler K,et al.Automated procedure for point and kinematic source inversion at regional distances.J Geophys Res,2010,115:1-24
    13 Wan Y G.Introduction to Seismology(in Chinese).Beijing:Science Press,2016[万永革.地震学导论.北京:科学出版社,2016]
    14 Guo L C,Pang M H.Surface-wave magnitude of earthquakes and its station correction(in Chinese).Acta Seismol Sin,1981,3:312-320[郭履灿,庞明虎.面波震级和它的台基校正值.地震学报,1981,3:312-320]
    15 Han X J,Ma Y L,Liu R F.The measurement method research of the new IASPEI standard broadband surface wave magnitude(in Chinese).Seismol Geomag Obs Res,2011,32:9-12[韩雪君,马延路,刘瑞丰.IASPEI宽频带面波震级的测定方法研究.地震地磁观测与研究,2011,32:9-12]
    16 Bormann P,Liu R,Xu Z,et al.First application of the new IASPEI teleseismic magnitude standards to data of the China National Seismographic Network.Bull Seism Soc Am,2009,99:1868-1891
    17 The Working Group on Magnitudes of the International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth’s Interior(IASPEI)Commission on Seismological Observation and Interpretation.Summary of Magnitude Working Group recommendations on standard procedures for determining earthquake magnitudes from digital data.International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth’s Interior(IASPEI),2013
    18 Duputel Z,Rivera L,Kanamori H,et al.W-phase fast source inversion for moderate to large earhquakes(1990-2010).J Geophys Res,2012,189:1125-1147
    19 Hayes G P,Rivera L,Kanamori H.Source inversion of the W-phase:Real-time implementation and extension to low magnitudes.Seismol Res Lett,2009,80:800-805
    20 Kanamori H,Rivera L.Source inversion of W phase:Speeding up seismic tsunami warning.Geophys J Int,2008,175:222-238
    21 Yi G X,Long F,Liang M J,et al.Focal mechanism solutions and seismogenic structure of the 8 August 2017 M7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake and its aftershocks,northern Sichuan(in Chinese).Chin J Geophys,2017,60:4083-4097[易桂喜,龙锋,梁明剑,等.2017年8月8日九寨沟M7.0地震及余震震源机制解与发震构造分析.地球物理学报,2017,60:4083-4097]
    22 Yang Y H,Fan J,Hua Q,et al.Inversion for the local mechanisms of the 2017 Jiuzhaigou M7.0 earthquake sequence using near-field full waveforms(in Chinese).Chin J Geophys,2017,60:4098-4104[杨宜海,范军,花茜,等.近震全波形反演2017年九寨沟M7.0地震序列震源机制解.地球物理学报,2017,60:4098-4104]
    23 Utsu T.A statistical study on the occurrence of aftershocks.Geophys Mag,1961,30:521-605
    24 Sornette D,Sornette A.General theory of the modified Gutenberg-Richter law for large seismic moments.Bull Seismol Soc Am,1999,89:1121-1130
    25 Wald H F,Ellsworth W L.A double-difference earthquake location algorithm:Method and application to the Northern Hayward Fault,California.Bull Seismol Soc Am,2000,90:1353-1368
    26 Zhao L S,Helmberger D V.Source estimation from broadband regional seismograms.Bull Seismol Soc Am,1994,84:91-104
    27 Zhu L P,Helmberger D V.Advancement in source estimation techniques using broadband regional seismograms.Bull Seismol Soc Am,1996,86:1634-1641
    28 Zhu L,Rivera L A.A note on the dynamic and static displacements from a point source in multilayered media.Geophys J Int,2002,148:619-627
    29 Kanamori H.Mechanics of earthquakes.Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci,1994,22:207-237
    30 Station Network Center of Strong Motion.The brief report of strong motion observation(in Chinese).2017,4[国家强震动台网中心.强震动观测简报.2017,4]
    31 Ren Y F,Wen R Z,Zhou B F,et al.The characteristics of strong ground motion of Lushan earthquake on April 20,2013(in Chinese).Chin J Geophys,2014,57:1836-1846[任叶飞,温瑞智,周宝峰,等.2013年4月20日四川芦山地震强地面运动三要素特征分析.地球物理学报,2014,57:1836-1846]
    32 Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China,General Administration of Quality Supervision,Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China.Code for Seismic Design of Building GB50011-2010(in Chinese).Beijing:China Architecture Industry Press,2010[中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部,中国人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局.建筑抗震设计规范GB50011-2010.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010]
    33 General Administration of Quality Supervision,Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China,Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China.Seismic Ground Motion Parameter Zonation Map of China GB18306-2015(in Chinese).Beijing:Standard Press of China,2015[中国人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.中国地震动参数区划图GB18306-2015.北京:中国标准出版社,2015]
    34 Deng Q D,Gao X,Chen G H,et al.Recent tectonic activity of Bayankala fault-block and the Kunlun-Wenchuan earthquake series of the Tibetan Plateau(in Chinese).Earth Sci Front,2010,17:163-178[邓起东,高翔,陈桂华,等.青藏高原昆仑-汶川地震系列与巴颜喀喇断块的最新活动.地学前缘,2010,17:163-178]
    35 Zhou R J,Pu X H.Recent activity of Minjiang fault zone,uplift of Minshan block and their relationship with seismicity of Sichuan(in Chinese).Seismol Geol,2000,22:285-294[周荣军,蒲晓虹.四川岷江断裂带北段的新活动,岷山断块的隆起及其与地震活动的关系.地震地质,2000,22:285-294]
    36 Fang G R,Zhou H L.Rupture mechanism of the Songpan earthquake of M6.7 on 22 August 1976(in Chinese).Earthq Res China,1986,2:75-78[房桂荣,周蕙兰.1976年8月22日松潘6.7级地震的破裂机制.中国地震,1986,2:75-78]
    37 Toda S,Stein R S,Sevilgen V,et al.Coulomb 3.3 graphic-rich deformation and stress-change software for earthquake,tectonic,and volcano research and teaching user guide.Open File Report.Reston:U.S.Geological Survey,2011
    38 Toda S,Lin J,Meghraoui M,et al.12 May 2008 M=7.9 Wenchuan,China,earthquake calculated to increase failure stress and seismicity rate on three major fault systems.Geophys Res Lett,2008,35:L17305,doi:10.1029/2008GL034903
    39 Lin J,Stein R S.Stress triggering in thrust and subduction earthquakes and stress interaction between the southern San Andreas and nearby thrust and strike-slip faults.J Geophys Res Sol Earth,2004,109:B02303,doi:10.1029/2003JB002607
    40 Stein R S,King G C,Lin J.Change in failure stress on the southern San Andreas fault system caused by the 1992 magnitude=7.4 landers earthquake.Science,1992,258:1328-1332
    41 King G C P,Stein R S,Lin J.Static stress changes and the triggering of earthquakes.Bull Seismol Soc Am,1994,84:935-953
    42 Wang W M,Zhao L F,Li J,et al.Rupture process of the Ms8.0 Wenchuan earthquake of Sichuan,China(in Chinese).Chin J Geophys,2008,51:1403-1410[王卫民,赵连锋,李娟,等.四川汶川8.0级地震震源过程.地球物理学报,2008,51:1403-1410]
    43 Wang W M,Hao J L,Yao Z X.Preliminary result for rupture process of Apr.20,2013,Lushan earthquake,Sichuan,China(in Chinese).Chin J Geophys,2013,56:1412-1417[王卫民,郝金来,姚振兴.2013年4月20日四川芦山地震震源破裂过程反演初步结果.地球物理学报,2013,56:1412-1417]
    44 Wang X,Zhou Y,Sun M,et al.Rupture process of the 2010 Mw6.9 Yushu earthquake in Qinghai Province.Geol Bull Chin,2014,33:517-523[王洵,周云,孙蒙,等.青海玉树Mw6.9级地震震源破裂过程.地质通报,2014,33:517-523]
    45 Sun M,Wang W M,Wang X,et al.Rupture process of the Minxian-Zhangxian,Gansu,China Ms6.6 earthquake on 22 July 2013(in Chinese).Chin J Geophys,2015,58:1909-1918[孙蒙,王卫民,王洵,等.2013年7月22日甘肃岷县-漳县Ms6.6地震震源破裂过程.地球物理学报,2015,58:1909-1918]
    46 Harris R A.Introduction to special section:Stress triggers,stress shadows,and implications for seismic hazard.J Geophys Res,1998,103:24347-24358
    47 Wang J J,Xu C J.Coseismic Coulomb stress changes associated with the 2017 Mw6.5 Jiuzhaigou earthquake(China)and its impacts on surrounding major faults(in Chinese).Chin J Geophys,2017,60:4398-4420[汪建军,许才军.2017年Mw6.5九寨沟地震激发的同震库仑应力变化及其对周边断层的影响.地球物理学报,2017,60:4398-4420]

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700