高管薪酬差距、治理模式和企业创新
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Executive Pay Dispersion,Governance Mode and Enterprise Innovation
  • 作者:牛建波 ; 李胜楠 ; 杨育龙 ; 董晨悄
  • 英文作者:NIU Jianbo;LI Shengnan;YANG Yulong;DONG Chenqiao;China Academy of Corporate Governance,Nankai University;Business School,Nankai University;Department of Economics and Management,Tianjin University;Tianjin Branch,Price Waterhouse Coopers;
  • 关键词:高管薪酬差距 ; 创新效率 ; 监督型治理 ; 信任型治理 ; 治理模式
  • 英文关键词:executive pay dispersion;;innovation efficiency;;supervisory-based governance;;trust-based governance;;governance mode
  • 中文刊名:JCJJ
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Management Science
  • 机构:南开大学中国公司治理研究院;南开大学商学院;天津大学管理与经济学部;普华永道中天会计师事务所天津分所;
  • 出版日期:2019-03-20
  • 出版单位:管理科学
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.32;No.182
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金(71672094,71572081);; 教育部人文社会科学研究项目(16YJA630040,15YJA630028);; 天津市哲学社会科学规划重点项目(TJGL16-003);; 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(NBZXB1450)~~
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:JCJJ201902007
  • 页数:17
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:23-1510/C
  • 分类号:81-97
摘要
高管薪酬差距是一个广受学者和实务界人士关注的问题,其对高管的社会心理和行为动机产生重要影响,并进一步影响企业的创新绩效。已有关于薪酬差距与企业创新之间关系的研究主要基于锦标赛理论和社会比较理论,分别从相互竞争和公平的视角对薪酬差距的经济后果进行分析。但是,这两种理论主要从薪酬差距对低薪酬获得者的立场,分析薪酬差距与创新的关系,忽视了薪酬差距对高薪酬获得者的心理和行为的影响。以心理学视角,从CEO自信、企业家精神和CEO的内在激励角度探讨高管薪酬差距对企业创新绩效的影响,并进一步考察监督型治理和信任型治理两种不同的治理模式对高管薪酬差距与企业创新之间关系的调节作用。采用2005年至2016年在上海和深圳两个证券交易所上市的企业数据,使用Stata 15. 0对研究假设进行实证检验。研究结果表明,高管薪酬差距对企业专利申请数量没有显著影响,但对专利授予数量有显著影响,表明增加高管的薪酬差距有利于提高企业的创新效率;相对于发明专利,高管薪酬差距增加对于实用新型专利和外观设计专利产生更加显著的影响。进一步地,监督型治理模式对高管薪酬差距与发明专利授予数量之间的关系有显著的负向调节作用,但对高管薪酬差距与专利申请数量之间的关系没有显著影响;信任型治理模式负向调节高管薪酬差距与企业申请专利数量之间的关系,却正向调节高管薪酬差距与专利授予数量之间的关系。综合分析可知,信任型治理模式能够提高企业创新的效率。把社会心理学和组织行为学的信任机制引入委托代理框架,提出监督型治理和信任型治理两种治理模式,并分析治理模式对高管薪酬差距与企业创新之间关系的调节作用,为理解和缓解企业创新过程中的代理问题提供了新的启示,即为了促进企业创新,需要构建信任型治理模式。
        The executive pay dispersion is an issue of great concern to scholars and practitioners. The executive pay dispersion can exert an important impact on the social psychology and behavioral motivation of executives,and further affect the company's innovation performance. However,the research on the relationship between salary dispersion and corporate innovation is mainly based on tournament theory and social comparison theory. These two theories analyze the economic consequences of the pay dispersion from a competing and fair perspective and mainly focus on the relationship between the pay dispersion and the innovation from the position of the less paid recipients,ignoring the impact of the pay dispersion on the psychology and behavior of the high pay receivers.This paper studies the influence of the executive pay gap between CEO and other management compensation on enterprise innovation from the psychological perspective. The paper studies the impact of executive pay dispersion on corporate innovation performance from the perspective of the highest payee( CEO),and examines the moderating effect of governance mode by classifying the corporate governance mode into the trust-based governance and supervisory-based governance.The hypotheses are also testified according to the data in Chinese listed companies. Through the study,it is found that the executive pay dispersion has no significant impact on the number of patent applications,but it has a significant impact on the number of patents grant. These results imply that increasing the pay dispersion of executives is conducive to improving the company's innovation efficiency. Further analysis discovers that the increase in the executive pay dispersion has had a more significant impact on utility model patents and design patents compared with invention patents.Further,the supervisory-based governance plays a significant negative role in the relationship between the executive pay dispersion and the number of invention patents granted. However,there is no significant moderating impact on the relationship between the executive pay dispersion and the number of patent applications. The trust-based governance negatively impacts the relationship between the executive pay dispersion and the number of patent applications and positively impacts the relationship between the executive pay dispersion and the number of patent grants. A comprehensive analysis of the impact of the two governance modes on corporate innovation can be found that the trust governance mode can improve the efficiency of corporate innovation.This paper introduces the trust mechanism of social psychology and organizational behavior into the principal-agent framework,proposes two governance modes of supervised governance and trust-based governance,and analyzes the moderating effect of the governance mode on the relationship between executive pay dispersion and enterprise innovation. These results provide a new inspiration for understanding and explaining the agency problem in enterprise innovation.
引文
[1]LAZEAR E P,ROSEN S.Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts.Journal of Political Economy,1981,89(5):841-864.
    [2]GENTRY R J,SHEN W.The impacts of performance relative to analyst forecasts and analyst coverage on firm R&D intensity.Strategic Management Journal,2013,34(1):121-130.
    [3]BEBCHUK L A,FRIED J M,WALKER D I.Managerial power and rent extraction in the design of executive compensation.University of Chicago Law Review,2002,69(3):751-846.
    [4]ZAHEER A,MCEVILY B,PERRONE V.Does trust matter?Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance.Organization Science,1998,9(2):123-251.
    [5]SUNDER J,SUNDER S V,ZHANG J J.Pilot CEOs and corporate innovation.Journal of Financial Economics,2017,123(1):209-224.
    [6]程新生,郑毅.公司治理机制中的信任关系及其对创新影响的模拟研究.管理学报,2014,11(6):869-875.CHENG Xinsheng,ZHENG Yi.A study on trust relationship in corporate governance mechanism and its impact on innovation by simulation.Chinese Journal of Management,2014,11(6):869-875.(in Chinese)
    [7]DAS T K,TENG B S.Between trust and control:developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances.Academy of Management Review,1998,23(3):491-512.
    [8]DAS T K,TENG B S.Trust,control,and risk in strategic alliances:an integrated framework.Organization Studies,2001,22(2):251-283.
    [9]FRYXELL G E,DOOLEY R S,VRYZA M.After the ink dries:the interaction of trust and control in US-based international joint ventures.Journal of Management Studies,2002,39(6):865-886.
    [10]LARSON A.Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings:a study of the governance of exchange relationships.Administrative Science Quarterly,1992,37(1):76-104.
    [11]PURANAM P,VANNESTE B S.Trust and governance:untangling a tangled web.Academy of Management Review,2009,34(1):11-31.
    [12]MAYER R C,DAVIS J H,SCHOORMAN F D.An integrative model of organizational trust.Academy of Management Review,1995,20(3):709-734.
    [13]GULATI R.Does familiarity breed trust:the implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances.Academy of Management Journal,1995,38(1):85-112.
    [14]SIMONS T L,PETERSON R S.Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams:the pivotal role of intragroup trust.Journal of Applied Psychology,2000,85(1):102-111.
    [15]刘智强,李超,廖建桥,等.组织中地位、地位赋予方式与员工创造性产出:来自国有企事业单位的实证研究.管理世界,2015(3):86-101.LIU Zhiqiang,LI Chao,LIAO Jianqiao,et al.The individual status in organizations,the status-conferral ways and employee's creative outcomes:a case study from the stateowned enterprises in China.Management World,2015(3):86-101.(in Chinese)
    [16]ASTRACHAN J H.Strategy in family business:toward a multidimensional research agenda.Journal of Family Business Strategy,2010,1(1):6-14.
    [17]MCEVILY B,PERRONE V,ZAHEER A.Trust as an organizing principle.Organization Science,2003,14(1):91-103.
    [18]STRICKLAND L H.Surveillance and trust.Journal of Personality,1958,26(2):200-215.
    [19]雅诺什·科尔奈.诚实与信任:后社会主义转轨的视角∥吴敬琏.比较.北京:中信出版社,2003:1-16.KORNAI J.Honesty and trust in the light of the post-socialist transition∥WU Jinglian.Comparative Studies.Beijing:China Citic Press,2003:1-16.(in Chinese)
    [20]FIRTH M,LEUNG T Y,RUI O M,et al.Relative pay and its effects on firm efficiency in a transitional economy.Journal of Economic Behavior&Organization,2015,110:59-77.
    [21]孔东民,徐茗丽,孔高文.企业内部薪酬差距与创新.经济研究,2017,52(10):144-157.KONG Dongmin,XU Mingli,KONG Gaowen.Pay dispersion and firm innovation in China.Economic Research Journal,2017,52(10):144-157.(in Chinese)
    [22]翟淑萍,毕晓方,李欣.薪酬差距激励了高新技术企业创新吗?.科学决策,2017(6):1-28.ZHAI Shuping,BI Xiaofang,LI Xin.Do incentive pay dispersion stimulate innovation of high-tech enterprise?.Scientific Decision Making,2017(6):1-28.(in Chinese)
    [23]XU M L,KONG G W,KONG D M.Does wage justice hamper creativity?Pay gap and firm innovation in China.China Economic Review,2017,44:186-202.
    [24]杨婵,贺小刚,朱丽娜,等.垂直薪酬差距与新创企业的创新精神.财经研究,2017,43(7):32-44.YANG Chan,HE Xiaogang,ZHU Lina,et al.Vertical pay dispersion and innovation spirit of new ventures.Journal of Finance and Economics,2017,43(7):32-44.(in Chinese)
    [25]SHEIKH S A.Peer group benchmarking in CEO compensation and firm innovation:evidence from patents and citations.International Journal of Accounting and Finance,2017,7(2):163-184.
    [26]程新生,李海萍.治理人监督与战略绩效信息偏误的情境依赖.管理科学学报,2011,14(10):1-10.CHENG Xinsheng,LI Haiping.Dependence on institution condition between governor supervision and distorted information of strategic performance:power development and punishment strength.Journal of Management Sciences in China,2011,14(10):1-10.(in Chinese)
    [27]蔡宁,董艳华,刘峰.董事会之谜:基于尚德电力的案例研究.管理世界,2015(4):155-165.CAI Ning,DONG Yanhua,LIU Feng.The puzzle of board:based on the case study of Suntech.Management World,2015(4):155-165.(in Chinese)
    [28]HAYWARD M L A,HAMBRICK D C.Explaining the premiums paid for large acquisitions:evidence of CEO hubris.Administrative Science Quarterly,1997,42(1):103-127.
    [29]HUMPHERY-JENNER M,LISIC L L,NANDA V,et al.Executive overconfidence and compensation structure.Journal of Financial Economics,2016,119(3):533-558.
    [30]YU C F J.CEO overconfidence,CEO compensation,and earnings manipulation.Journal of Management Accounting Research,2014,26(2):167-193.
    [31]HAMBRICK D C,MASON P A.Upper echelons:the organization as a reflection of its top managers.Academy of Management Review,1984,9(2):193-206.
    [32]余明桂,李文贵,潘红波.管理者过度自信与企业风险承担.金融研究,2013(1):149-163.YU Minggui,LI Wengui,PAN Hongbo.Managerial overconfidence and corporate risk-taking.Journal of Financial Research,2013(1):149-163.(in Chinese)
    [33]BAKER M P,WURGLER J,YUAN Y.Global,local,and contagious investor sentiment.Journal of Financial Economics,2012,104(2):272-287.
    [34]ADAM T R,FERNANDO C S,GOLUBEVA E.Managerial overconfidence and corporate risk management.Journal of Banking&Finance,2015,60:195-208.
    [35]GALASSO A,SIMCOE T S.CEO overconfidence and innovation.Management Science,2011,57(8):1469-1484.
    [36]GRIFFIN D,TVERSKY A.The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence.Cognitive Psychology,1992,24(3):411-435.
    [37]MALMENDIER U,TATE G.Behavioral CEOs:the role of managerial overconfidence.The Journal of Economic Perspectives,2015,29(4):37-60.
    [38]LEE K W,LEV B,YEO G H H.Executive pay dispersion,corporate governance,and firm performance.Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting,2008,30(3):315-338.
    [39]权小锋,尹洪英.中国式卖空机制与公司创新:基于融资融券分步扩容的自然实验.管理世界,2017(1):128-144.QUAN Xiaofeng,YIN Hongying.Chinese short selling mechanism and corporate innovation:a natural experiment from Chinese margin trading program.Management World,2017(1):128-144.(in Chinese)
    [40]JENSEN M C,MECKLING W H.Theory of the firm:managerial behavior,agency costs and ownership structure.Journal of Financial Economics,1976,3(4):305-360.
    [41]ATUAHENE-GIMA K,LI H Y.When does trust matter?Antecedents and contingent effects of supervisee trust on performance in selling new products in China and the United States.Journal of Marketing,2002,66(3):61-81.
    [42]刘凤委,李琳,薛云奎.信任,交易成本与商业信用模式.经济研究,2009,44(8):60-72.LIU Fengwei,LI Lin,XUE Yunkui.Trust,transaction cost and mode of trade credit.Economic Research Journal,2009,44(8):60-72.(in Chinese)
    [43]JENSEN M C,MURPHY K J.Performance pay and top-management incentives.Journal of Political Economy,1990,98(2):225-264.
    [44]贾凡胜,张一林,李广众.非正式制度的有限激励作用:基于地区信任环境对高管薪酬激励影响的实证研究.南开管理评论,2017,20(6):116-128,149.JIA Fansheng,ZHANG Yilin,LI Guangzhong.The limited incentive effect of the informal institution:an empirical study of trust environment on the efficiency of executive compensation contract.Nankai Business Review,2017,20(6):116-128,149.(in Chinese)
    [45]戴治勇.法治、信任与企业激励薪酬设计.管理世界,2014(2):102-110.DAI Zhiyong.The rule by law,trust and the design of the incentive pay in firms.Management World,2014(2):102-110.(in Chinese)
    [46]DAVIS J H,SCHOORMAN F D,DONALDSON L.Toward a stewardship theory of management.Academy of Management Review,1997,22(1):20-47.
    [47]HOLMSTROM B R.Pay without performance and the managerial power hypothesis:a comment.Journal of Corporation Law,2005,30:703-713.
    [48]ADAMS R B.Asking directors about their dual roles.Oxford:University of Oxford,2009.
    [49]林浚清,黄祖辉,孙永祥.高管团队内薪酬差距、公司绩效和治理结构.经济研究,2003,38(4):31-40.LIN Junqing,HUANG Zuhui,SUN Yongxiang.TMT pay dispersion,firm performance and corporate governance.Economic Research Journal,2003,38(4):31-40.(in Chinese)
    [50]张正堂.高层管理团队协作需要、薪酬差距和企业绩效:竞赛理论的视角.南开管理评论,2007,10(2):4-11.ZHANG Zhengtang.Needs for top management team coordination needs,compensation dispersion and firm performance:a perspective of tournament theory.Nankai Business Review,2007,10(2):4-11.(in Chinese)
    [51]CLAESSENS S,YURTOGLU B B.Corporate governance in emerging markets:a survey.Emerging Markets Review,2013,15:1-33.
    [52]FAN J P H,WEI K C J,XU X Z.Corporate finance and governance in emerging markets:a selective review and an agenda for future research.Journal of Corporate Finance,2011,17(2):207-214.
    [53]BLACK B S,DE CARVALHO A G,KHANNA V S,et al.Corporate governance indices and construct validity.Corporate Governance:An International Review,2017,25(6):397-410.
    [54]FILATOTCHEV I,WRIGHT M.Methodological issues in governance research:an editor's perspective.Corporate Governance:An International Review,2017,25(6):454-460.
    [55]BELLOC F.Corporate governance and innovation:a survey.Journal of Economic Surveys,2012,26(5):835-864.
    [56]张勇,龙立荣.绩效薪酬对团队成员探索行为和利用行为的影响.管理科学,2013,26(3):9-18.ZHANG Yong,LONG Lirong.Impact of pay for performance on team members'exploration and exploitation behaviors.Journal of Management Science,2013,26(3):9-18.(in Chinese)

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700