生理学试卷质量评价体系的建立及应用
|
摘要
利用SjFx的计分核查和专业试卷分析功能、SPSS强大的统计分析功能及Excel数据整理分选优势,构建一套生理学试卷质量评价体系,用于评价学生成绩和试卷出题质量,为提高本科教学质量提供可靠客观的信息。并以此分析了2005年春-2018年春合计89套、16 907份生理学试卷,难易度(0. 72±0. 05),区分度(0. 47±0. 14),信度(0. 81±0. 06),57套(64%)试卷为正态分布。该体系可满足不同的试卷分析要求;生理学试卷整体质量较高,但成绩的正态性还有待改善。
A system for the quality evaluation of physiology examination papers was constructed,built on the function of scoring verification and professional paper analysis of SjFx,statistical analysis of SPSS and data sorting advantages of Excel,to evaluate the students' scores and the quality of the examination papers,which provides reliable and objective information to improve the teaching quality. This system was used to analyze 89 sets,16,907 physiological examination papers of the spring semester from 2005 to 2018;the difficulty level was 0. 72 ± 0. 05; distinction degree was 0. 47 ± 0. 14,and reliability was 0. 81 ± 0. 06. Among them,57 sets( 64%) were normally distributed. The system was able to meet different requirements for examination paper analysis. The test papers were of high quality,but the normal distribution of the scores still needs to be improved.
A system for the quality evaluation of physiology examination papers was constructed,built on the function of scoring verification and professional paper analysis of SjFx,statistical analysis of SPSS and data sorting advantages of Excel,to evaluate the students' scores and the quality of the examination papers,which provides reliable and objective information to improve the teaching quality. This system was used to analyze 89 sets,16,907 physiological examination papers of the spring semester from 2005 to 2018;the difficulty level was 0. 72 ± 0. 05; distinction degree was 0. 47 ± 0. 14,and reliability was 0. 81 ± 0. 06. Among them,57 sets( 64%) were normally distributed. The system was able to meet different requirements for examination paper analysis. The test papers were of high quality,but the normal distribution of the scores still needs to be improved.
引文
[1]黄颖,林端宜.试卷分析研究现状综述[J].西北医学教育,2005,13(1):39-40.
[2]唐玉红,周华,朱敏佳,等.生理学非标准化考核与考试的探索与实践[J].四川生理科学杂志,2017,39(3):163-165.
[3]孙艳芹,李洪梅,熊晖,等.病理学考试成绩和试卷质量分析与评价[J].基础医学教育,2013,15(1):20-22.
[4]张东海,马秀华,赵留庄,等.依据5年试卷分析的临床综合课程教学质量同质化研究[J].基础医学教育,2018,20(7):564-567.
[5]朱德全.教育测量学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2016,118-123.
[6]陈桃香,石俊枝,万瑜,等.生理学考试成绩分析与试卷质量评估[J].基础医学教育,2016,18(10):788-790.
[2]唐玉红,周华,朱敏佳,等.生理学非标准化考核与考试的探索与实践[J].四川生理科学杂志,2017,39(3):163-165.
[3]孙艳芹,李洪梅,熊晖,等.病理学考试成绩和试卷质量分析与评价[J].基础医学教育,2013,15(1):20-22.
[4]张东海,马秀华,赵留庄,等.依据5年试卷分析的临床综合课程教学质量同质化研究[J].基础医学教育,2018,20(7):564-567.
[5]朱德全.教育测量学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2016,118-123.
[6]陈桃香,石俊枝,万瑜,等.生理学考试成绩分析与试卷质量评估[J].基础医学教育,2016,18(10):788-790.