绿肥不同栽培模式对冬闲期植烟土壤的影响
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Effects of Different Cropping Patterns of Green Manure on Tobacco-soil Property during Slack Winter Season
  • 作者:杨蒙岭 ; 蒋豪 ; 顾勇 ; 谢强 ; 张永辉 ; 徐传涛 ; 陈凡
  • 英文作者:YANG Meng-ling;JIANG Hao;GU Yong;XIE Qiang;ZHANG Yong-hui;XU Chuan-tao;CHEN Fan;Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment,Chinese Academy of Sciences;University of Chinese Academy of Sciences;Luzhou Branch of Sichuan Tobacco Company;Huidong Branch of Liangshan Prefecture Company,Sichuan Tobacco Company;
  • 关键词:绿肥混播 ; 紫云英 ; 黑麦草 ; 土壤酶活性 ; 土壤微生物生物量
  • 英文关键词:Green manure;;Astragalus sinicus;;Lolium perenne;;Soil enzyme activity;;Soil microbial biomass
  • 中文刊名:XNYX
  • 英文刊名:Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences
  • 机构:中国科学院水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所;中国科学院大学;四川省烟草公司泸州市公司;四川省烟草公司凉山州公司会东分公司;
  • 出版日期:2018-08-28
  • 出版单位:西南农业学报
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.31
  • 基金:中国烟草总公司四川省公司重点科技项目(SCYC201504)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:XNYX201808034
  • 页数:7
  • CN:08
  • ISSN:51-1213/S
  • 分类号:204-210
摘要
【目的】本文研究了烟田冬闲期种植绿肥对土壤的影响。【方法】以冬闲期植烟土壤为研究对象,布置单种紫云英(Z)、单种黑麦草(H),混播紫云英和黑麦草(HZ)3种处理,在植烟前测定土壤特性,分析绿肥不同种植模式对植烟土壤的影响。【结果】不同种植模式对土壤养分含量影响不同:与H和Z处理相比,HZ处理显著提高了土壤有机质和全氮含量,达到29.88和0.96g/kg;与H处理相比,HZ处理的土壤速效钾、速效磷的含量分别提高了9.5%和38.03%,达到209.19和45.20 mg/kg。HZ处理下,土壤中性磷酸酶和脲酶活性以及土壤微生物碳、氮含量显著高于H和Z处理(P<0.05)。相关性分析表明,土壤酶活性与土壤微生物碳、氮含量显著相关(R>0.8,P<0.01);土壤有机质含量与土壤微生物碳含量显著相关(R>0.78,P<0.01);土壤全氮含量与土壤微生物氮含量显著相关(R>0.78,P<0.01);土壤速效磷含量与土壤微生物磷含量显著相关(R>0.78,P<0.01)。【结论】综上所述,冬闲期混合种植豆科-禾本科绿肥可以更好的提高植烟土壤的养分,改善土壤微环境。
        【Objective】This paper aimed to investigate the effect of green manure mixture sowing during slack winter season on soil nutrition.【Method】Taken the tobacco-soil slack winter season as tested objects,three treatments,including Z: Astragalus sinicus(22. 5 kg/hm~2);H: Lolium perenne(15 kg/hm~2) and HZ: mixture cropping of A. sinicus(18 kg/hm~2) with Lolium perenne(3 kg/hm~2),were carried out,the tobacco soils were determined before planting,and the effects of different cropping patterns of green manure on tobacco-soil property were analyzed. 【Result】The effects of different cropping patterns on soil nutrition contents were different: Compared with H and Z treatments,HZ treatment significantly increase the soil organic matter and total nitrogen,reaching 29. 88 and 0. 96 g/kg; Compared with H treatment,the contents of soil available potassium and available phosphorus HZ treatment increased 9. 5 % and 38. 03 %,reaching 209. 19 and 45. 20 mg/kg,respectively. The soil enzyme(neutral phosphates,urease) activities and the concentration of soil microbial carbon and nitrogen under HZ treatment were significantly higher than that under H and Z(P < 0. 05). Correlation analysis indicated that The soil enzyme(neutral phosphates,urease) activities had the correlation with soil microbial carbon and microbial nitrogen(R > 0. 8,P < 0. 01); Soil organic matter content had the correlation with microbial carbon(R > 0. 78,P < 0. 01); Soil total nitrogen content had the correlation with soil microbial content(R > 0. 78,P < 0. 01); Soil available phosphorus content had the correlation with soil microbial phosphorus content(R > 0. 78,P <0. 01). 【Conclusion】In conclusion,the green manures mixture sowing could increase tobacco-soil fertility and soil micro-environment,which was assumed to be better decreasing the obstacles in traditional cropping patterns.
引文
[1]王彦亭,谢剑平,李志宏.中国烟草种植区划[M].北京:中国科学出版社,2010.
    [2]Solymosi I K,Bernand M.Soil metals,chloroplasts,and secure crop production:a review[J].Agronomy for Sustainable Development,2012,32(1):245-272.
    [3]Benin C,Yang X H,Weston L A.The role of root exudates and allelochemicals in the rhizosphere[J].Plant and Soil,2003,256(1):67-83.
    [4]郭亚利,李明海,吴洪田,等.烤烟根系分泌物对烤烟幼苗生长和养分吸收的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2007,13(3):458-463.
    [5]李鑫,张秀丽,孙冰玉,等.烤烟连作对耕层土壤酶活性及微生物区系的影响[J].土壤,2012,44(3):456-460.
    [6]贾志红,易建华,苏以荣,等.烟区轮作与连作土壤细菌群落多样性比较[J].生态环境学报,2010,19(7):1578-1585.
    [7]段玉琪,陈冬梅,晋艳,等.不同肥料对连作烟草根际土壤微生物及酶活性的影响[J].中国农业科技导报,2012,14(3):122-126.
    [8]李子双,廉晓娟,王薇,等.我国绿肥的研究进展[J].草业科学,2013,30(7):1135-1140.
    [9]陈国军,闫慧峰,吴凯,等.不同收获期的籽粒觉绿肥还田对土壤养分的影响[J].草业学报,2016,26(3):215-224.
    [10]郑伟,加娜尔古丽,唐高溶,等.混播种类与混播比例对豆禾混播草地浅层土壤养分的影响[J].草业科学,2015,32(3):329-339.
    [11]汤俊燕,杨文浩,周碧青,等.紫云英翻压对水田土壤可溶性有机氮及生化性质的影响[J].土壤通报,2016,47(3):651-659.
    [12]高篙涓,曹卫东,白金顺,等.长期冬种绿肥改变红壤稻田土壤微生物生物量特性[J].土壤学报,2015,52(4):902-910.
    [13]肖嫩群,张洪霞,成壮,等.紫云英还田量对烟田土壤微生物及酶的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2010,18(4):711-715.
    [14]魏云霞.紫云英与油菜、黑麦草混播种植和利用效应研究[D].华中农业大学,201.
    [15]鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1999.
    [16]吴金水,林启美,黄巧云,等.土壤微生物生物量测定方法及应用[M].北京:气象出版社,2001.
    [17]关松荫.土壤酶及其研究方法[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1986.
    [18]包兴国,杨文玉,曹卫东,等.豆科与禾本科绿肥饲草作物混播增肥及改土效果研究[J].中国草地学报,2012,34(1):43-47.
    [19]王殿武,文振海,文宏达,等.高寒半干旱区油菜牧草混播草地土壤环境效应[J].草业学报,1999,8(4):1-9.
    [20]谢开云,赵云,李向林,等.豆-禾混播草地种间关系研究进展[J].草业学报,2013,22(3):284-296.
    [21]刘文辉,张英俊,师尚礼,等.高寒区施肥和豆科混播水平刘燕麦人工草地土壤酶活性的影响[J].草业学报,2017,26(1):23-33.
    [22]Caldwell M M,Dawson T E,Richards J H.Hydraulic lift:consequences of water efflux from the roots of plants[J].Oecologia,1998,113(2):151-161.
    [23]Ledgard S F,Steele K W.Biological nitrogen fixation in mixed legume/grass pastures[J].Plant and Soil,1992,141(1):137-153.
    [24]Jeranyama P,Hesterman O B,Waddington S R,et al.Relay intercropping of sunnhemp and cowpea into a smallholder maize system in Zimbabwe[J].Agronomy Journal,2000,92:239-244.
    [25]徐阳春,沈其荣,冉炜.长期免耕与施用有机肥对土壤微生物生物量碳、氮、磷的影响[J].土壤学报,2002,39(1):89-96.
    [26]沈宏,曹志洪,徐本生.玉米生长期间土壤微生物量与土壤酶变化及其相关性研究[J].应用生态学报,1998,10(4):471-474.
    [27]蒋跃利,赵彤,闰浩,等.黄土丘陵区不同土地利用方式对土壤微生物量碳氮磷的影响[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(6):62-68.
    [29]Sparing G P,Pankhunrst C,Doube B M,et al.Soil microbial biomass,activity and nutrient cycling as indicators of soil health//Biological indicators of Soil Health[J].CAB International,1997:97-119.
    [30]赵彤,闫浩,蒋跃利,等.黄土丘陵区植被类型对土壤微生物量碳氮磷的影响[J].生态学报,2013,33(18):5615-5622.
    [31]万水霞,唐杉,蒋光月,等.紫云英与化肥配施对土壤微生物特征和作物产量的影响[J].草业学报,2016,25(6):109-117.
    [32]Fang S Z,Li H Y,Xie B D.Decomposition and nutrient release of four potential mulching materials for poplar plantations on upland sites[J].Agroforestry Systems,2008,74(1):27-35.
    [33]汪文霞,周建斌,严德翼,等.黄土区不同类型土壤微生物量碳、氮和可溶性有机碳、氮的含量及其关系[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(6):103-106.
    [34]赵军,耿增超,尚杰,等.生物炭及炭基硝酸铵对土壤微生物量碳、氮及酶活性的影响[J].生态学报,2016,36(8):2355-2362
    [35]陈国潮,何振立.红壤不同利用方式下微生物量的研究[J].土壤通报,1998,29(6):276-278.
    [36]孙凤霞,张伟华,徐明岗,等.长期施肥对红壤微生物生物量碳氮和微生物碳源利用的影响[J].应用生态学报,2010(11):2792-2798.
    [37]颜志雷,方宇,陈济琛,等.连年翻压紫云英对稻田土壤养分和微生物学特性的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2014,20(5):1151-1160.
    [38]Breue L,Huisman J A,Keller T,et al.Impact of a conversion from cropland to grassland on C and N storage and related soil properties:Analysis of a 60-year chronosequence[J].Ceoderma,2006,133:6-18.
    [39]Gunapala N,Scow K M.Dynamics of soil microbial biomass and activity in conventional and organic farming systems[J].Soil biology&Biochemistry,1998,30:805-816.
    [40]李正,刘国顺,敬海霞,等.绿肥与化肥配施对植烟土壤微生物量及供氮能力的影响[J].草业学报,2011,20(6):126-134.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700