四川省南部县水土保持功能服务价值评价
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Evaluation of Service Value of Soil and Water Conservation Function in Nanbu County, Sichuan Province
  • 作者:徐文秀 ; 王海燕 ; 鲍玉海 ; 丛佩娟 ; 李进林
  • 英文作者:XU Wenxiu;WANG Haiyan;BAO Yuhai;CONG Peijuan;LI Jinlin;School of Geography and Tourism,Chongqing Normal University;Key Laboratory of Mountain Surface Processes and Ecological Regulation,Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment,Chinese Academy of Sciences;Monitoring Center of Soil and Water Conservation,Ministry of Water Resources;College of Resources and Environment,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences;
  • 关键词:水土保持功能 ; 服务价值 ; 功能评价
  • 英文关键词:soil and water conservation function;;service value;;functional evaluation
  • 中文刊名:STJJ
  • 英文刊名:Ecological Economy
  • 机构:重庆师范大学地理与旅游学院;中国科学院水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所山地表生过程与生态调控重点实验室;水利部水土保持监测中心;中国科学院大学资源与环境学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-08-01
  • 出版单位:生态经济
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.35;No.344
  • 基金:水利部2017年财政专项水土保持业务项目“水土保持补偿基础工作”(126216229000150001)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:STJJ201908033
  • 页数:5
  • CN:08
  • ISSN:53-1193/F
  • 分类号:185-189
摘要
文章以川渝山地丘陵区的四川省南部县为研究对象,利用统计数据、文献资料和水土流失实测数据,从保护水土资源、防洪减灾、改善生态3个主要方面构建水土保持功能服务价值评价指标体系,采用市场价值法、影子工程法、机会成本法等方法估算了研究区自然地貌植被的水土保持功能服务价值。研究结果表明:2016年南部县水土保持功能服务总价值为4.46×10~4万元,单位面积水土保持功能服务价值为2.11元/平方米。其中,保护水土资源功能服务价值最大,为2.38×10~4万元,占总价值的53.39%,其次为改善生态功能服务价值,为2.07×10~4万元,占比为46.41%,防洪减灾功能服务价值最小,为87.98万元,占比为0.20%。研究结果可为区域水土保持补偿费的合理定价、水土流失综合治理提供科学理论依据。
        Nanbu County of Sichuan Province in the hilly area of Sichuan and Chongqing regions was selected as the research object.Based on statistical data,literature data and field data of soil and water loss,the evaluation index system of service value of soil and water conservation function was constructed from three main aspects of conserving soil and water resources,controlling flood and mitigating disaster,and improving the ecosystem.The service value of soil and water conservation function in Nanbu County was estimated by market value method,shadow engineering method and opportunity cost method.The results show that the total service value of soil and water conservation function in Nanbu County was 4.46×10~4 million yuan,and the per unit area service value was 2.11 yuan/m2.In summary,the conserving soil and water resources function had the largest value,with 2.38×10~4 million yuan and accounting for 53.39 percent of the total value,followed by the improving the ecosystem function with the value of 2.07×10~4 million yuan and accounting for 46.41 percent of the total value,and the controlling flood and mitigating disaster function had the smallest value with 87.98 million yuan and accounting for 0.20 percent of the total value.The research results can provide a scientific theoretical basis for reasonable pricing of compensation fees for regional soil and water conservation and comprehensive control of soil erosion.
引文
[1]余新晓,吴岚,饶良懿,等.水土保持生态服务功能价值估算[J].中国水土保持科学,2008(1):83-86.
    [2]张超,王治国,凌峰,等.水土保持功能评价及其在水土保持区划中的应用[J].中国水土保持科学,2016(5):90-99.
    [3]余新晓,吴岚,饶良懿,等.水土保持生态服务功能评价方法[J].中国水土保持科学,2007(2):110-113.
    [4]Daily G.Nature’s services:Societal dependence on natural ecosystems[M].Washington DC:Island Press,1997.
    [5]Costanza R,D’Arge R,Groot R,et al.The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J].Ecological Economics,1998,25(1):3-15.
    [6]李颖,文梅燕.关于水土保持生态服务功能及其价值的探讨[J].资源节约与环保,2017(4):70-74.
    [7]杨文勇.水土保持生态服务功能及其价值探讨[J].科技创新与应用,2017(8):158-158.
    [8]刘自强,王海燕,田凤霞,等.甘肃省庆阳市董志塬水土保持功能服务价值估算[J].水土保持通报,2018(5):168-173.
    [9]Fu B J,Liu Y,Lv Y H,et al.Assessing the soil erosion control service of ecosystems change in the Loess Plateau of China[J]Ecological Complexity,2011,8(4):284-293.
    [10]刘国彬,赵广举,王国梁,等.水土保持的生态服务功能[J]科技导报,2016(17):89-93.
    [11]雷孝章,曹叔尤,戴华龙,等.川中丘陵区“长治”工程的减沙效益研究[J].泥沙研究,2003(1):52-58.
    [12]王志伟,朱捍华.生态措施对亚热带丘陵区紫色土水土保持效应及机理[J].农业现代化研究,2011(2):226-229.
    [13]高艳鹏,谭雪红,张岩,等.四川省小流域水土保持措施与土壤侵蚀耦合关系研究[J].水土保持研究,2010(2):6-9.
    [14]王海燕,田凤霞,鲍玉海,等.水土保持功能服务价值评价指标体系构建[J].中国水土保持,2018(5):24-26.
    [15]何静,张建军,李永红,等.新疆地区水土保持功能价值评估方法及生态服务价值估算[J].水土保持通报,2012(6):110-115.
    [16]吴岚,秦富仓,余新晓,等.水土保持林草措施生态服务功能价值化研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2007(9):20-24.
    [17]王兵,郑秋红,郭浩.基于Shannon-Wiener指数的中国森林物种多样性保育价值评估方法[J].林业科学研究,2008(2):268-274.
    [18]郑绍伟,牛牧,张琴,等.川中丘陵区不同类型柏木林地植物群落结构和多样性研究[J].四川林业科技,2011(5):20-28.
    [19]吴鹏,丁访军,陈骏.中国西南地区森林生物量及生产力研究综述[J].湖北农业科学,2012(8):1513-1518.
    [20]于维莲,董丹,倪健.中国西南山地喀斯特与非喀斯特森林的生物量与生产力比较[J].亚热带资源与环境学报,2010(2):25-30.
    [21]顾泽贤,赵筱青,普军伟,等.人工园林大面积种植区植被净初级生产力时空变化研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2018(2):421-432.
    [22]吴岚,秦富仓,余新晓,等.水土保持林草措施生态服务功能价值化研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2007(9):20-24.
    [23]周萍,刘国彬,侯喜禄.黄土丘陵区退耕前后典型流域农业生态经济系统能值分析[J].农业工程学报,2009(6):266-273.
    [24]Li J,Ren Z Y.Changes in ecosystem service values on the Loess Plateau in Northern Shaanxi Province,China[J].Agricultural Sciences in China,2008,7(5):606-614.
    [25]Rao E M,Xiao Y,Ouyang Z Y,et al.Changes in ecosystem service of soil conservation between 2000 and 2010 and its driving factors in Southwestern China[J].Chinese Geographical Science2016,26(2):165-173.
    [26]Fu B J,Liu Y,Lv Y H,et al.Assessing the soil erosion control service of ecosystems change in the Loess Plateau of China[J]Ecological Complexity,2011,8(4):284-293.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700