化肥施用与涉肥财税优惠政策:回顾与展望
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Fertilizer Application and Fertilizer-related Taxation Preferential Policies:Review and Prospect
  • 作者:周克清 ; 杨昭
  • 英文作者:Zhou Ke-qing;Yang Zhao;School of Finance and Taxation,Southwestern University Of Finance And Economics;
  • 关键词:化肥 ; 过量施用 ; 财税优惠
  • 英文关键词:fertilizer;;excessive application;;fiscal preference
  • 中文刊名:SWYJ
  • 英文刊名:Taxation and Economy
  • 机构:西南财经大学财政税务学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-01-07
  • 出版单位:税务与经济
  • 年:2019
  • 期:No.222
  • 基金:国家社会科学基金规划项目“现代财政制度框架下的地方税系研究”(项目编号:14BJY165)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:SWYJ201901012
  • 页数:6
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:22-1210/F
  • 分类号:76-81
摘要
为促进农业和农村发展,长期以来我国政府对化肥的生产、流通和施用实行了较为优厚的财税优惠政策。这些政策确实推动了农村和农业发展,但也在一定程度上导致了化肥产能过剩,引发了化肥的过量施用和严重的环境问题,难以适应农业可持续发展的要求。从供给和需求的角度剖析现行财税优惠政策加剧化肥滥用的传导机制:一方面,加剧产能过剩,扭曲价格信号;另一方面,刺激化肥需求,引发过度施用。因此,应对化肥财税优惠政策进行优化:实行功能型财税优惠政策,鼓励化肥企业转型升级;整合涉肥补贴资金,保障政策的连续性和持续性;注重化肥财税优惠与其他政策的协调配合。
        In order to promote agricultural and rural development,the Chinese government has implemented a relatively favorable fiscal and taxation preferential policies for the production,circulation and application of chemical fertilizers for a long time. These policies have indeed promoted the development of rural areas and agriculture,but they have also led to a surplus of fertilizers to a certain extent,which has caused the excessive application of fertilizers and serious environmental problems. Therefore,it is difficult to achieve the sustainable agricultural development. From the perspective of supply and demand to review the evolution and changes of China's chemical fertilizer taxation preferential policies,a study is conducted in this paper to analyze the transmission mechanism in which the taxation preferential policies aggravate fertilizer abuse. Then some suggestions are put forward. Firstly,it is important to implement functional fiscal and taxation preferential policies to encourage the transformation and upgrading of fertilizer enterprises. Secondly,it is essential to integrate fund for fertilizer subsidies to ensure continuity and sustainability of policies. Last but not least,it is vital to focus on the coordination of the fiscal and taxation preferential policies of the fertilizer and other policies.
引文
[1]高玉强.农业补贴制度优化研究[D].大连:东北财经大学,2011.
    [2]张卫峰,等.中国肥料发展研究报告2016[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,2017.
    [3]李宇轩.中国化肥产业政策对粮食生产的影响研究[D].北京:中国农业大学,2014.
    [4]葛继红,等.要素市场扭曲是否激发了农业面源污染——以化肥为例[J].农业经济问题,2012,(3):92-98,112.
    [5]潘丹.中国化肥施用强度变动的因素分解分析[J].华南农业大学学报:社会科学版,2014,13(2):24-31.
    [6]郑良永,杜丽清.我国农业化肥污染及环境保护对策[J].中国热带农业,2013,(2):76-78.
    [7]周和平.气价放开,化肥市场影响几何?[J].中国石油和化工,2016,(12):26-27.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700