中俄铁路列车脱轨稳定性判定对比研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:A comparative Study on Stability Judgment of Train Derailment between China and Russia
  • 作者:郝远行
  • 英文作者:HAO Yuanxing;China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co.,Ltd.;
  • 关键词:俄罗斯 ; 脱轨 ; 稳定性 ; 中俄规范 ; 对比
  • 英文关键词:Russia;;derailment;;stability;;Chinese and Russian codes;;comparison
  • 中文刊名:GSTL
  • 英文刊名:High Speed Railway Technology
  • 机构:中铁二院工程集团有限责任公司;
  • 出版日期:2019-04-28
  • 出版单位:高速铁路技术
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.10;No.55
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:GSTL201902018
  • 页数:4
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:51-1730/U
  • 分类号:92-95
摘要
文章针对中国铁路设计规范和俄罗斯铁路设计规范在铁路列车脱轨稳定性判定上存在差异的问题,结合莫斯科至喀山高速铁路设计项目,在分析研究了俄罗斯铁路规范关于列车脱轨稳定性原理的基础上,对两国规范关于列车脱轨稳定性判断的规定进行了对比。结果表明:俄罗斯规范对于列车脱轨稳定性的判断较中国规范严格。中国规范规定列车脱轨系数P_g/P_b<0. 8,将俄罗斯规范规定的抗脱轨稳定性安全系数公式进行转化后,采用莫喀高速铁路设计中的车辆参数,计算得出列车脱轨系数P_g/P_b<0. 74。因此,建议在莫喀高速铁路设计中,脱轨系数限值按0. 74控制较为合适。
        In the light of the difference in the stability judgment of train derailment between Chinese and Russian railway design codes and in combination with the Moscow-Kazan high-speed railway project,the analysis and study is made on the stability principle of train derailment in Russian railway codes and a comparison is made on the regulations on judgment of the stability of train derailment between China and Russia. The results show that the judgment of derailment stability in Russian specifications is stricter than that in Chinese codes. The derailment coefficient P_g/P_b< 0. 8 is stipulated in the Chinese code. After transforming the safety factor formula of anti-derailment stability stipulated in the Russian code,the derailment coefficient P_g/P_b< 0. 74 is calculated by using the vehicle parameters in the design of Moscow-Kazan high-speed railway. Therefore,it is suggested that the limit value of derailment coefficient should be controlled at 0. 74 in the design of Moscow-Kazan high-speed railway.
引文
[1]王捷,沈钢.高速铁路内侧护轨参数对防脱轨特性影响的分析[J].高速铁路技术,2013,4(4):7-11.WANG Jie,SHEN Gang. Analysis on Parameters of Inner-side Guardrail against Derailment on High-speed Railway[J]. High Speed Railway Technology,2013,4(4):7-11.
    [2]关庆华.列车脱轨机理及运行安全性研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2010.GUAN Qinghua. Study on Derailment Mechanism and Running Safety of Trains[D]. Chengdu:Southwest Jiaotong University,2010.
    [3] TB 10621-2014高速铁路设计规范[S].TB 10621-2014 Code for Design of High Speed Railway[S].
    [4]向俊,周智辉,曾庆元.列车脱轨研究最新进展[J].铁道科学与工程学报,2005,27(5):1-8.XIANG Jun,ZHOU Zhihui,ZENG Qingyuan. Latest Development in Train Derailment Research[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering,2005,27(5):1-8.
    [5]马卫华,王自力.抗脱轨稳定性的评定方法及实例[J].铁道车辆,2004,42(8):1-3.MA Weihua, WANG Zili. The Evaluation Method of Derailment Stability and the Practical Examples[J]. Railway vehicle,2004,42(8):1-3.
    [6] Alexander L. Lisitsyn,李莉.俄罗斯铁路货车空车脱轨研究[J].国外铁道车辆,2006,43(5):21-24.Alexander L. Lisitsyn,LI Li. Research on the Derailment of Empty Freight Car on the Russian Railroads[J]. Foreign Rolling Stock,2006,43(5):21-24.
    [7]易思蓉,何华武.铁道工程[M].北京:中国铁道出版社,2011.YI Sirong,HE Huawu. Railway Engineering[M]. Beijing:China Railway Publishing House,2011.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700