论魏晋般若学对“虚”“实”范畴的影响
|
摘要
魏晋南北朝时期,玄学打破了两汉以来儒家对士人的高度压抑,激发了士人阶层的自我个性及生命意识觉醒。佛学般若学承继了格义佛学的特点,积极从玄学中汲取思想智慧,得到了上层社会前所未有的认可。以有无、色性和性空等为论证核心的六家七宗中,即色说、心无义说、不真空论等对"空"与"色""有"与"无"等问题的探讨,从佛学出发,又融合了玄学的智慧,呈现出纷异的思辨哲学色彩,为美学的"虚""实"范畴提供了重要的思想资源。
During the Wei,Jin,Southern and Northern dynasties,Neo-Taoism broke the high repression of Confucianism existed since the Han dynasty,and stimulated scholars' awareness of personality and life consciousness.Buddhism Prajna inherited the characteristics of Geyi Buddhism,and drew wisdom from Neo-Taoism,thereby,it got unprecedented recognition from upper class of society.Among the Six Schools(including Seven Sects),Zhi Dun,Zhi Mindu and Seng Zhao put forward a series of new viewpoints about Sūnya(Empty),which combined Buddhist and Neo-Taoism.These theories have deeply influenced the category of"Emptiness"and"Reality".
During the Wei,Jin,Southern and Northern dynasties,Neo-Taoism broke the high repression of Confucianism existed since the Han dynasty,and stimulated scholars' awareness of personality and life consciousness.Buddhism Prajna inherited the characteristics of Geyi Buddhism,and drew wisdom from Neo-Taoism,thereby,it got unprecedented recognition from upper class of society.Among the Six Schools(including Seven Sects),Zhi Dun,Zhi Mindu and Seng Zhao put forward a series of new viewpoints about Sūnya(Empty),which combined Buddhist and Neo-Taoism.These theories have deeply influenced the category of"Emptiness"and"Reality".
引文
[1]叶朗.中国美学史大纲[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1985.
[2]章太炎.国学概论[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1997.
[3]张扌为之.世说新语译注(上,下)[M].[南朝·宋]刘义庆,著.上海:上海古籍出版社,2016.
[4]胡海,秦秋咀.中国美学通史(第3卷:魏晋南北朝卷)[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2014.
[5]任继愈.魏晋南北朝佛学经学[M].北京:国家图书馆出版社,2013.
[6]任继愈.中国佛教史(第1卷)[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1981.
[7]李泽厚,刘纪纲.中国美学史——魏晋南北朝编(上、下)[M].合肥:安徽文艺出版社,1999.
[8]梁晓萍.“妙”范畴探微[J].文艺研究,2017(10):67-74.
[9]潘桂明.般若学六家七宗述论[J],佛学研究,2003(12):134-151.
[10][唐]释道世.法苑珠林[M].周叔迦,苏晋仁,校注.北京:中华书局,2003.
[11][梁]释慧皎.高僧传[M].汤用彤,校注.汤一介,整理.北京:中华书局,1992.
[12]石俊,楼宇烈,方立天,等.中国佛教思想资料选编(第1卷)[M].北京:中华书局,1981.
[13]汉语大词典编辑委员会,汉语大词典编纂处.汉语大词典(第2卷)[M].上海:汉语大词典出版社,1988.
[14]王振复.僧肇《般若无知论》的美学意蕴[C]∥朱志荣.中国美学研究(第3辑).北京:商务印书馆,2014.
[15]麻天祥.魏晋般若六家七宗“空”说的比较与诠释[J].中国政法大学学报,2014(3):94-107.
[2]章太炎.国学概论[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1997.
[3]张扌为之.世说新语译注(上,下)[M].[南朝·宋]刘义庆,著.上海:上海古籍出版社,2016.
[4]胡海,秦秋咀.中国美学通史(第3卷:魏晋南北朝卷)[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2014.
[5]任继愈.魏晋南北朝佛学经学[M].北京:国家图书馆出版社,2013.
[6]任继愈.中国佛教史(第1卷)[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1981.
[7]李泽厚,刘纪纲.中国美学史——魏晋南北朝编(上、下)[M].合肥:安徽文艺出版社,1999.
[8]梁晓萍.“妙”范畴探微[J].文艺研究,2017(10):67-74.
[9]潘桂明.般若学六家七宗述论[J],佛学研究,2003(12):134-151.
[10][唐]释道世.法苑珠林[M].周叔迦,苏晋仁,校注.北京:中华书局,2003.
[11][梁]释慧皎.高僧传[M].汤用彤,校注.汤一介,整理.北京:中华书局,1992.
[12]石俊,楼宇烈,方立天,等.中国佛教思想资料选编(第1卷)[M].北京:中华书局,1981.
[13]汉语大词典编辑委员会,汉语大词典编纂处.汉语大词典(第2卷)[M].上海:汉语大词典出版社,1988.
[14]王振复.僧肇《般若无知论》的美学意蕴[C]∥朱志荣.中国美学研究(第3辑).北京:商务印书馆,2014.
[15]麻天祥.魏晋般若六家七宗“空”说的比较与诠释[J].中国政法大学学报,2014(3):94-107.