封闭式负压引流术治疗骨创伤的临床效果
|
摘要
目的观察封闭式负压引流术治疗骨创伤的临床效果。方法选取2012年1月~2016年12月我院收治的94例骨创伤患者作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为研究组和对比组,每组各47例。研究组实施封闭式负压引流术治疗,对比组实施常规换药治疗,分析比较两组的临床指标、治疗效果及不良反应发生率。结果研究组患者的换药次数、住院时间、住院费用、愈合时间等临床指标均优于对比组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组的治疗总有效率高于对比组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组患者的不良反应发生率(6.38%)低于对比组(25.53%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论骨创伤患者应用封闭式负压引流术治疗的临床效果较好,可缩短患者住院时间,避免不良反应的发生,利于患者尽早康复,应在实际治疗中予以广泛推广和应用。
Objective To observe the clinical effect of closed negative pressure drainage in the treatment of bone trauma. Methods A total of 94 patients with bone trauma treated in our hospital from January 2012 to December 2016 were selected as the subjects, and divided into study group and comparsion group by random number table method,with 47 cases in each group. The study group was treated with closed negative pressure drainage. The comparison group was treated with routine dressing change. The clinical indexes, therapeutic effect and adverse reaction rate were compared and analyzed between the two groups. Results The number of changes of medicine, length of stay, hospitalization expenses, and healing time in the study group were better than those in the comparison group, and the differences were statistically significant(P <0.05). The total effective rate in the study group was higher than that in the comparison group, with significant statistical difference(P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the study group(6.38%) was lower than that in comparison group(25.53%), the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion Trauma patients with the clinical effect of closed negative pressure drainage treatment is better, which can shorten in-hospital time, avoid the occurrence of adverse reactions, for patient rehabilitation as soon as possible, and should be popularized and applied widely in the actual treatment.
Objective To observe the clinical effect of closed negative pressure drainage in the treatment of bone trauma. Methods A total of 94 patients with bone trauma treated in our hospital from January 2012 to December 2016 were selected as the subjects, and divided into study group and comparsion group by random number table method,with 47 cases in each group. The study group was treated with closed negative pressure drainage. The comparison group was treated with routine dressing change. The clinical indexes, therapeutic effect and adverse reaction rate were compared and analyzed between the two groups. Results The number of changes of medicine, length of stay, hospitalization expenses, and healing time in the study group were better than those in the comparison group, and the differences were statistically significant(P <0.05). The total effective rate in the study group was higher than that in the comparison group, with significant statistical difference(P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the study group(6.38%) was lower than that in comparison group(25.53%), the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion Trauma patients with the clinical effect of closed negative pressure drainage treatment is better, which can shorten in-hospital time, avoid the occurrence of adverse reactions, for patient rehabilitation as soon as possible, and should be popularized and applied widely in the actual treatment.
引文
[1]杨继斌.持续封闭负压引流在86例骨科创伤患者治疗中的应用[J].中国医学创新,2013,10(1):26-27.
[2]王家梁,黄玉良,邬哲慧,等.骨外科中负压封闭引流术治疗创伤软组织缺损的临床探讨[J].中国医学创新,2016,13(8):27-30.
[3]林红,刘岩,宋爱华,等.封闭负压引流治疗骨科创伤感染临床疗效分析[J].护理实践与研究,2013,10(14):108-109.
[4]李斌.封闭式负压引流技术治疗骨科创伤感染的临床效果[J].中国社区医师,2016,32(31):35-36.
[5]刘丰.封闭式负压引流技术在骨外科创伤治疗中的应用[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2014,6(10):59-61.
[6]林传东,吕敏清,黄冠文.封闭式负压引流术治疗骨创伤的临床应用价值[J].现代诊断与治疗,2015,26(18):4084-4085.
[7]王岭.封闭式负压引流技术治疗骨科创伤感染临床研究[J].中国伤残医学,2016,24(8):59-60.
[8]李国喜,魏庆华.封闭式负压引流术治疗骨科创伤感染的临床疗效分析[J].世界临床医学,2017,11(4):30-31.
[9]王长明.封闭式负压引流术治疗骨创伤的临床研究[J].中国卫生标准管理,2016,7(21):30-31.
[10]陈龙弟.研究改良封闭式负压引流技术在骨外科创伤治疗中的应用[J].当代临床医刊,2017,30(1):2840.
[11]杨军琪,张有为,李小宏.封闭式负压引流治疗骨科创伤及感染创面的临床效果分析[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2015,7(7):109-111.
[12]彭磊.持续封闭负压引流术在骨科创伤中的临床应用[J].实用中西医结合临床,2014,14(12):41-42.
[13]李红良.封闭式负压引流技术治疗25例骨科创伤感染临床效果分析[J].吉林医学,2014,35(6):1272.
[14]刘国荣.负压封闭引流用于骨创伤创面的临床疗效观察[J].医学理论与实践,2013,26(7):898-899.
[15]李润香,蒋治莉.封闭式负压引流技术在骨外科护理中的应用[J].中国当代医药,2017,24(32):186-188.
[16]吕志强,李兴华.益气活血方联合封闭负压引流术治疗骨创伤感染临床研究[J].陕西中医,2017,38(4):480-481.
[2]王家梁,黄玉良,邬哲慧,等.骨外科中负压封闭引流术治疗创伤软组织缺损的临床探讨[J].中国医学创新,2016,13(8):27-30.
[3]林红,刘岩,宋爱华,等.封闭负压引流治疗骨科创伤感染临床疗效分析[J].护理实践与研究,2013,10(14):108-109.
[4]李斌.封闭式负压引流技术治疗骨科创伤感染的临床效果[J].中国社区医师,2016,32(31):35-36.
[5]刘丰.封闭式负压引流技术在骨外科创伤治疗中的应用[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2014,6(10):59-61.
[6]林传东,吕敏清,黄冠文.封闭式负压引流术治疗骨创伤的临床应用价值[J].现代诊断与治疗,2015,26(18):4084-4085.
[7]王岭.封闭式负压引流技术治疗骨科创伤感染临床研究[J].中国伤残医学,2016,24(8):59-60.
[8]李国喜,魏庆华.封闭式负压引流术治疗骨科创伤感染的临床疗效分析[J].世界临床医学,2017,11(4):30-31.
[9]王长明.封闭式负压引流术治疗骨创伤的临床研究[J].中国卫生标准管理,2016,7(21):30-31.
[10]陈龙弟.研究改良封闭式负压引流技术在骨外科创伤治疗中的应用[J].当代临床医刊,2017,30(1):2840.
[11]杨军琪,张有为,李小宏.封闭式负压引流治疗骨科创伤及感染创面的临床效果分析[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2015,7(7):109-111.
[12]彭磊.持续封闭负压引流术在骨科创伤中的临床应用[J].实用中西医结合临床,2014,14(12):41-42.
[13]李红良.封闭式负压引流技术治疗25例骨科创伤感染临床效果分析[J].吉林医学,2014,35(6):1272.
[14]刘国荣.负压封闭引流用于骨创伤创面的临床疗效观察[J].医学理论与实践,2013,26(7):898-899.
[15]李润香,蒋治莉.封闭式负压引流技术在骨外科护理中的应用[J].中国当代医药,2017,24(32):186-188.
[16]吕志强,李兴华.益气活血方联合封闭负压引流术治疗骨创伤感染临床研究[J].陕西中医,2017,38(4):480-481.