全民健身视角下体育社会组织发展能力指标体系及应用研究
|
摘要
在总结前人相关理论研究成果的基础上,深入剖析体育社会组织发展能力的内涵和构成,形成包括投入能力、产出能力的准则层以及涵盖规范建设能力、内部治理能力、组织运行能力、服务能力、社会评价的约束层。同时,在全民健身视角下,探讨体育社会组织服务全民健身的运行机制,并采用文献分析和专家咨询等方法,在科学性、全面性和可操作性等原则下确定服务会员、服务政府、服务社会等指标,以期扩展社会组织能力建设理论和助力新时期全民健身计划实施。在指标体系的应用研究中,得出以下结论:体育社会组织具有发展能力总体水平偏低、整体差异化程度较高等特征,注重法人资格、规章制度等规范化指标建设,对服务社会、特色工作等关乎未来发展的关键性指标关注不够。对此,分别从政府、社会和体育社会组织3个方面提出针对性建议。
On the basis of summarizing the predecessors related theory research,this study deeply analyzed the connotation and composition of the development ability of sports social organizations,and found that development ability has the criterion layer including input ability and output ability,as well as the constraint layer covering normative construction ability,internal governance ability,organizational operation ability,service ability and social evaluation. At the same time,from the perspective of national fitness,this study explored the operational mechanism of sports social organizations serving national fitness,and determined the indicators of serving members,serving the government and serving the society under the principles of scientificity,comprehensiveness and operability by the methods of literature review and expert consultation,with a view to expanding the theory of capacity-building of social organizations and promoting the implementation of the national fitness plan in the new era. The following conclusions are drawn from the application study of the index system: sports social organizations have the characteristics of low overall level of development ability and high degree of overall differentiation; they pay attention to the construction of standardized indicators such as legal personality,rules and regulations,and pay insufficient attention to key indicators related to future development,such as serving the society and characteristic work. In this regard,specific suggestions are put forward from three aspects: government,society and sports social organizations.
On the basis of summarizing the predecessors related theory research,this study deeply analyzed the connotation and composition of the development ability of sports social organizations,and found that development ability has the criterion layer including input ability and output ability,as well as the constraint layer covering normative construction ability,internal governance ability,organizational operation ability,service ability and social evaluation. At the same time,from the perspective of national fitness,this study explored the operational mechanism of sports social organizations serving national fitness,and determined the indicators of serving members,serving the government and serving the society under the principles of scientificity,comprehensiveness and operability by the methods of literature review and expert consultation,with a view to expanding the theory of capacity-building of social organizations and promoting the implementation of the national fitness plan in the new era. The following conclusions are drawn from the application study of the index system: sports social organizations have the characteristics of low overall level of development ability and high degree of overall differentiation; they pay attention to the construction of standardized indicators such as legal personality,rules and regulations,and pay insufficient attention to key indicators related to future development,such as serving the society and characteristic work. In this regard,specific suggestions are put forward from three aspects: government,society and sports social organizations.
引文
[1]国务院.《全民健身计划(2016—2020年)》[EB/OL].(2016-06-23)[2017-06-21]. http://www.gov. cn/zhengce/content/2016-06/23/content_5084564.htm.
[2]张伟.创新社会治理视域下社会体育组织研究述评与前瞻[J].首都体育学院学报,2015(1):4-7.
[3]李理,黄亚玲.治理视域下体育社团社会责任的概念溯源及体系构建[J].北京体育大学学报,2018,41(2):25-32,39.
[4]向会英.依法行政视角下推进我国体育社会组织的发展[J].体育科研,2017,38(3):17-24.
[5]余静,余涛.我国群众体育发展评价指标体系的研究[J].沈阳体育学院学报,2011(10):16-20.
[6]叶萍.社会组织绩效评估指标体系研究[J].广西社会科学,2010(8):104-107.
[7]石国亮,李培晓.在社会组织评估指标体系中增设特色指标的思考与建议[J].理论与改革,2015(3):113-115.
[8]卢元镇.全民健身与生活方式[M].北京:北京体育大学出版社,2002:25-32.
[9]罗旭.我国全民健身服务体系的理论与实证研究[J].体育科学,2008(8):81-96.
[10]肖林鹏.论全民健身服务体系的概念及其结构[J].西安体育学院学报,2008(7):6-11.
[11]汪波,李慧萌.论多元化全民健身服务体系的概念与结构[J].体育科学,2011(2):5-11.
[12]王郓,李敏.中、美全民健身服务体系的比较分析[J].武汉体育学院学报,2015(12):31-38.
[13]马庆钰,曹堂哲,谢菊.中国社会组织发展指标体系构建与预测[J].中国行政管理,2015(4):13-21.
[14] JAE-ON KIM,CHARLES W.Mueller.因子分析:统计方法与应用问题[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2016:27-39.
[15]林海明.因子分析模型L的优良性和应用[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2013(3):96-113.
[2]张伟.创新社会治理视域下社会体育组织研究述评与前瞻[J].首都体育学院学报,2015(1):4-7.
[3]李理,黄亚玲.治理视域下体育社团社会责任的概念溯源及体系构建[J].北京体育大学学报,2018,41(2):25-32,39.
[4]向会英.依法行政视角下推进我国体育社会组织的发展[J].体育科研,2017,38(3):17-24.
[5]余静,余涛.我国群众体育发展评价指标体系的研究[J].沈阳体育学院学报,2011(10):16-20.
[6]叶萍.社会组织绩效评估指标体系研究[J].广西社会科学,2010(8):104-107.
[7]石国亮,李培晓.在社会组织评估指标体系中增设特色指标的思考与建议[J].理论与改革,2015(3):113-115.
[8]卢元镇.全民健身与生活方式[M].北京:北京体育大学出版社,2002:25-32.
[9]罗旭.我国全民健身服务体系的理论与实证研究[J].体育科学,2008(8):81-96.
[10]肖林鹏.论全民健身服务体系的概念及其结构[J].西安体育学院学报,2008(7):6-11.
[11]汪波,李慧萌.论多元化全民健身服务体系的概念与结构[J].体育科学,2011(2):5-11.
[12]王郓,李敏.中、美全民健身服务体系的比较分析[J].武汉体育学院学报,2015(12):31-38.
[13]马庆钰,曹堂哲,谢菊.中国社会组织发展指标体系构建与预测[J].中国行政管理,2015(4):13-21.
[14] JAE-ON KIM,CHARLES W.Mueller.因子分析:统计方法与应用问题[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2016:27-39.
[15]林海明.因子分析模型L的优良性和应用[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2013(3):96-113.