插穗和基质对牛樟扦插繁殖的影响
|
摘要
本文探索了插穗类型、保留叶片数以及扦插基质对牛樟穴盘扦插繁殖的影响。结果表明:半木质化插穗扦插生根率(56.00%)高于木质化插穗(52.67%),但木质化插穗扦插苗生长状况要优于半木质化插穗扦插苗;插穗带顶芽扦插显著优于不带,带顶芽扦插的生根率(72.67%)为不带顶芽扦插的生根率(36.00%)的2.02倍;不留叶片插穗扦插生根率为0,随着插穗保留叶片数的增多,生根率随之增加,扦插苗的生长状况也表现更好;采用珍珠岩为基质,扦插生根率最高,为80.67%,采用腐殖土为基质,扦插苗生长表现最好,隶属函数位列第一。
To determine the effect of different treatments on cutting propagation of Cinnamomum kanehirae, different factors,including scion type, leaf-retention and rooting medium were studied. The results showed that the rooting rate with semi-lignified branch(56.00%) was higher than witch with lignified branch(52.67%), but the growth status of the latter was better than the former.Cutting with terminal bud was significantly better than lateral bud. Its rooting rate(72.67%) was 2.02 times higher than witch with lateral bud. Rooting rate was 0 when cutting with no leaf. Nevertheless, it was higher and higher with the added leaves of cutting.And the seedlings grew better also. Rooting rate was the highest when using perlite as medium, came up to 80.67%. But when the medium was humus soil, cutting seedling had the best growth status. Its subordinate function value ranked number one.
To determine the effect of different treatments on cutting propagation of Cinnamomum kanehirae, different factors,including scion type, leaf-retention and rooting medium were studied. The results showed that the rooting rate with semi-lignified branch(56.00%) was higher than witch with lignified branch(52.67%), but the growth status of the latter was better than the former.Cutting with terminal bud was significantly better than lateral bud. Its rooting rate(72.67%) was 2.02 times higher than witch with lateral bud. Rooting rate was 0 when cutting with no leaf. Nevertheless, it was higher and higher with the added leaves of cutting.And the seedlings grew better also. Rooting rate was the highest when using perlite as medium, came up to 80.67%. But when the medium was humus soil, cutting seedling had the best growth status. Its subordinate function value ranked number one.
引文
[1]中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会.中国植物志(第三十一卷)[M].北京:科学出版社,1982:180-181.
[2]林赞标.牛樟与冇樟[J].林业试验所研究报告季刊,1993,8(1):11-20.
[3]Wu C,Chu F,Ho C,et al.Comparative analysis of the complete chloroplast genomic sequence and chemical components of Cinnamomum micranthum and Cinnamomum kanehirae[J].Holzforschung,2017,71(3):189-197.
[4]高毓斌,黄松根,刘一新.牛樟扦插苗造林五年后之生长表现[J].台湾林业科学,1999,14(1):45-52.
[5]高毓斌,黄松根.牛樟之扦插繁殖[J].林业试验所研究报告,1993,8(4):371-388.
[6]张东柱.牛樟扦插苗之两种新病害[J].林业试验所研究报告,1992,7(1):231-236.
[7]郭耀纶,陈佐治,郑钧誊.牛樟扦插苗的生长及光合作用对光量的反应[J].台湾林业科学,2004,19(3):215-224.
[8]Cho H,Chang C,Huang L,et al.Indole-3-butyric Acid suppresses the activity of peroxidase while inducing adventitious roots in Cinnamomum kanehirae[J].Botanical Studies,2011,52:153-160.
[9]林瑞进,张琮柏,洪祥凌,等.牛樟扦插苗与其根部内生真菌之亲和性[J].中华林学季刊,2015,48(2):127-136.
[10]林永洲.台湾牛樟引种造林试验初报[J].福建热作科技,2017,42(1):39-43.
[11]刘荣忠.牛樟组培快繁技术研究[J].现代农业科技,2012(24):163-164.
[12]官锦燕,谭嘉娜,罗剑飘,等.牛樟的组织培养和植株再生[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2016,40(4):63-68.
[13]孟红岩,郭莺,林文珍,等.台湾牛樟总RNA提取方法的建立[J].亚热带植物科学,2016,45(1):53-56.
[14]曾群生.牛樟扦插育苗技术研究[J].福建热作科技,2011,36(2):21-23.
[15]余小琴.不同植物激素对牛樟扦插生根和生长的影响[J].防护林科技,2017(6):7-9.
[16]周张德堂.台湾牛樟无性繁殖技术研究[D].福州:福建农林大学,2013.
[17]狄玉敏.沉水樟扦插繁殖试验[J].福建林业科技,2006,33(3):151-154.
[18]郭逸榴.高含量右旋芳樟醇大叶芳樟的选优及其扦插技术研究[D].南昌:江西农业大学,2015.
[19]刘建美.沉水樟容器扦插快繁技术试验研究[J].防护林科技,2015(5):51-54.
[20]罗坤水,罗忠生,叶金山,等.珍稀树种沉水樟嫩枝扦插技术研究[J].南方林业科学,2016,44(5):21.
[2]林赞标.牛樟与冇樟[J].林业试验所研究报告季刊,1993,8(1):11-20.
[3]Wu C,Chu F,Ho C,et al.Comparative analysis of the complete chloroplast genomic sequence and chemical components of Cinnamomum micranthum and Cinnamomum kanehirae[J].Holzforschung,2017,71(3):189-197.
[4]高毓斌,黄松根,刘一新.牛樟扦插苗造林五年后之生长表现[J].台湾林业科学,1999,14(1):45-52.
[5]高毓斌,黄松根.牛樟之扦插繁殖[J].林业试验所研究报告,1993,8(4):371-388.
[6]张东柱.牛樟扦插苗之两种新病害[J].林业试验所研究报告,1992,7(1):231-236.
[7]郭耀纶,陈佐治,郑钧誊.牛樟扦插苗的生长及光合作用对光量的反应[J].台湾林业科学,2004,19(3):215-224.
[8]Cho H,Chang C,Huang L,et al.Indole-3-butyric Acid suppresses the activity of peroxidase while inducing adventitious roots in Cinnamomum kanehirae[J].Botanical Studies,2011,52:153-160.
[9]林瑞进,张琮柏,洪祥凌,等.牛樟扦插苗与其根部内生真菌之亲和性[J].中华林学季刊,2015,48(2):127-136.
[10]林永洲.台湾牛樟引种造林试验初报[J].福建热作科技,2017,42(1):39-43.
[11]刘荣忠.牛樟组培快繁技术研究[J].现代农业科技,2012(24):163-164.
[12]官锦燕,谭嘉娜,罗剑飘,等.牛樟的组织培养和植株再生[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2016,40(4):63-68.
[13]孟红岩,郭莺,林文珍,等.台湾牛樟总RNA提取方法的建立[J].亚热带植物科学,2016,45(1):53-56.
[14]曾群生.牛樟扦插育苗技术研究[J].福建热作科技,2011,36(2):21-23.
[15]余小琴.不同植物激素对牛樟扦插生根和生长的影响[J].防护林科技,2017(6):7-9.
[16]周张德堂.台湾牛樟无性繁殖技术研究[D].福州:福建农林大学,2013.
[17]狄玉敏.沉水樟扦插繁殖试验[J].福建林业科技,2006,33(3):151-154.
[18]郭逸榴.高含量右旋芳樟醇大叶芳樟的选优及其扦插技术研究[D].南昌:江西农业大学,2015.
[19]刘建美.沉水樟容器扦插快繁技术试验研究[J].防护林科技,2015(5):51-54.
[20]罗坤水,罗忠生,叶金山,等.珍稀树种沉水樟嫩枝扦插技术研究[J].南方林业科学,2016,44(5):21.