摘要
目的分析在幼儿支气管肺炎中应用护理干预的临床效果及对肺功能产生的影响。方法择取2017年7月1日~2018年3月31日我院因支气管肺炎住院的幼儿患儿110例,随机将所选患儿分成对照组和研究组,对照组55例患儿给予常规护理,研究组55例患儿给予护理干预,对两组临床效果及对肺功能产生的影响进行分析和比较。结果研究组临床总有效率为94.55%,对照组临床总有效率为81.82%,研究组临床总有效率明显高于对照组(P <0.05);护理后研究组FVC、PEF、FEV1、FEF25%~75%均高于对照组(P <0.05);研究组皮疹、静脉刺激、胃肠反应以及渗漏等不良反应发生概率明显低于对照组(P <0.05);研究组咳嗽、发热以及肺湿啰音消失时间明显早于对照组(P <0.05)。结论在幼儿支气管肺炎中应用护理干预的效果良好,可以改善患儿的肺功能,避免不良反应出现,安全性良好,临床价值显著。
Objective To analyze the clinical effect of nursing intervention in children with bronchopneumonia and its effect on pulmonary function. Methods 110 children with bronchopneumonia who were hospitalized in our hospital and child health care hospital from July 1, 2017 to March 31, 2018 were selected and they were randomly divided into control group and study group. 55 children in the control group were treated with routine nursing while55 children in the study group were treated with nursing intervention. The clinical effects and the effect on pulmonary function in two groups were analyzed and compared. Results The clinical total effective rate of the study group and the control group were respectively 94.55% and 81.82%. The total effective rate of the study group was significantly higher than that of the control group(P < 0.05). After nursing, FVC, PEF, FEV1 and FEF25%-75% in the study group were all higher than those in the control group(P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions such as rash,venous irritation, gastrointestinal reaction and leakage occurred in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group(P < 0.05). The disappearance time of cough, fever and pulmonary moist rales in the study group were significantly earlier than those in the control group(P < 0.05). Conclusion The effect of nursing intervention in children with bronchopneumonia is good. It can improve pulmonary function of children, avoid the occurrence of adverse reactions. It has good safety and the clinical value is remarkable.
引文
[1]刘艳.提高血液标本采集质量的临床护理对策[J].世界临床医学,2017,1(17):136-137.
[2]蒋晓燕.优质护理模式对小儿支气管肺炎疗效及肺功能的影响[J].医疗装备,2017,30(10):163-164.
[3]陈涓.个性化护理措施对小儿支气管肺炎疗效及预后的影响分析[J].实用临床医药杂志,2017,21(4):149-151.
[4]吴雪梅,吴居逸,胡琼芳,等.护理干预对支气管肺炎患儿疗效及肺功能的影响[J].中国基层医药,2017,24(23):3533-3536.
[5]沈静,金菊英.基于个体差异化评价的护理干预在小儿支气管肺炎病人中的应用[J].全科护理,2016,14(18):1893-1896.
[6]李娟.以家庭为中心的护理对小儿支气管肺炎疗效及肺功能的影响[J].中国卫生标准管理,2016,1(8):222-224.
[7]房素萍.优质护理对支气管肺炎患儿临床疗效及肺功能的影响[J].临床合理用药杂志,2016,9(36):138-139.
[8]梁展穗,邓杨富,梁意妹,等.三维适性支持护理在支气管肺炎雾化吸入治疗儿童病例中的应用[J].全科护理,2017,1(35):4401-4403.
[9]余微微.优质护理模式对小儿支气管肺炎疗效及肺功能的影响[J].医学理论与实践,2016,29(10):1375-1377.
[10]周慧霞.护理干预对小儿支气管肺炎疗效及肺功能的影响[J].数理医药学杂志,2016,29(3):466-467.
[11]薛连珍,任杰,孙妍,等.基于量化评估策略下的护理干预对支气管肺炎患儿临床症状及肺功能的影响[J].中国组织工程研究,2016,1(2):258-259.
[12]韩宏梅,邢凤霞,刘文静,等.探讨优质护理干预用于小儿支气管肺炎患儿护理对肺功能的影响[J].中国现代药物应用,2017,11(10):156-157.
[13]刘碧容.以家庭为中心的护理对小儿支气管肺炎疗效及肺功能的影响观察[J].医药卫生(文摘版),2016,2(9):153.
[14]龚春阳.护理干预对小儿支气管肺炎治疗效果、肺功能及不良反应的影响观察[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2018,1(2):236-237.
[15]徐春华.优质护理模式对小儿支气管肺炎疗效及肺功能的影响[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2016,16(47):1375-1377.