知识产权保护对作物转基因技术创新模式的影响及政策建议
|
摘要
知识产权保护在作物转基因技术创新研发过程中的重要性日益显现,其作用已从防御性手段转变成战略性工具,显著影响着作物转基因技术创新主体的创新模式选择。考虑到技术创新主体进行技术创新有一定的先后顺序,是一种动态的博弈,选择斯塔克博格博弈模型,借助产量和利润两个重要指标,分析产业竞争环境下原始品种创新与派生品种创新的两种创新模式的创新绩效,建立模型通过产量、利润等创新绩效的表达公式推算知识产权保护可以通过影响创新绩效从而影响作物转基因技术的创新模式选择,并基于创新模式选择的知识产权保护战略分析,提出完善我国作物转基因技术知识产权保护的政策建议。
Intellectual property protection has become increasingly important during the R&D process of genetically modified crops. Its role has shifted from a defensive approach to a strategic tool,which has significantly affected innovation models of crops transgenic technology. Considering a certain order during the process of technology innovation which makes it a dynamic game,on the basis of Starkelberg Model and two key indicators of yields and profits,this paper analyzes the performance of original innovation and derivative innovation in the environment of industrial competition,and establishes models to devise formulas forinnovation performance calculation including yields,profit,etc. It concludes that intellectual property protection can directly affect innovation performance,thus affecting innovation models of crops transgenic technology based on case studies. Based on the strategic analysis of intellectual property protection,suggestions have been further brought up in this thesis to improve the policies of intellectual property protection on Crops Transgenic Technology.
Intellectual property protection has become increasingly important during the R&D process of genetically modified crops. Its role has shifted from a defensive approach to a strategic tool,which has significantly affected innovation models of crops transgenic technology. Considering a certain order during the process of technology innovation which makes it a dynamic game,on the basis of Starkelberg Model and two key indicators of yields and profits,this paper analyzes the performance of original innovation and derivative innovation in the environment of industrial competition,and establishes models to devise formulas forinnovation performance calculation including yields,profit,etc. It concludes that intellectual property protection can directly affect innovation performance,thus affecting innovation models of crops transgenic technology based on case studies. Based on the strategic analysis of intellectual property protection,suggestions have been further brought up in this thesis to improve the policies of intellectual property protection on Crops Transgenic Technology.
引文
[1]韩庚辰.农业生物技术产业的机遇与挑战[J].中国农村科技,2010(2):37-40.
[2]董宏林,王庆锋.国内外农业自主创新现状评述[J].宁夏农林科技,2008(2):33-35.
[3]游达明,杨晓辉,朱桂菊.多主体参与下企业技术创新模式动态选择研究[J].中国管理科学,2015(23):151-158.
[4]张春辉,陈继祥.考虑吸收能力与R&D投入的创新模式选择[J].系统管理学报,2012,21(1):93-98.
[5]张春辉,陈继祥.两种创新补贴对创新模式选择影响的比较分析[J].科研管理,2011,32(8):9-16.
[6]朱文玉,李仿.我国植物新品种权保护的缺陷及其完善[J].安徽农业科学,2015,43(6):314-317.
[7]陈龙江,熊启泉.中国种业开放十余年:回顾与反思[J].华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2013,11(3):8-17.
[8]黄大昉.我国转基因作物育种发展回顾与思考[J].生物工程学报,2015,31(6):31-35.
[9]田富强.产业化带动产学研合作转基因技术创新[J].江苏农业科学,2013(11):450-451.
[10]李菊丹.中国植物新品种保护应适应国情和潮流[J].中国农村科技,2014(5):25-28.
[11]朱文涛.基于创新方法分析路径的创新系统研究[D].上海:上海交通大学,2016:42-44.
[2]董宏林,王庆锋.国内外农业自主创新现状评述[J].宁夏农林科技,2008(2):33-35.
[3]游达明,杨晓辉,朱桂菊.多主体参与下企业技术创新模式动态选择研究[J].中国管理科学,2015(23):151-158.
[4]张春辉,陈继祥.考虑吸收能力与R&D投入的创新模式选择[J].系统管理学报,2012,21(1):93-98.
[5]张春辉,陈继祥.两种创新补贴对创新模式选择影响的比较分析[J].科研管理,2011,32(8):9-16.
[6]朱文玉,李仿.我国植物新品种权保护的缺陷及其完善[J].安徽农业科学,2015,43(6):314-317.
[7]陈龙江,熊启泉.中国种业开放十余年:回顾与反思[J].华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2013,11(3):8-17.
[8]黄大昉.我国转基因作物育种发展回顾与思考[J].生物工程学报,2015,31(6):31-35.
[9]田富强.产业化带动产学研合作转基因技术创新[J].江苏农业科学,2013(11):450-451.
[10]李菊丹.中国植物新品种保护应适应国情和潮流[J].中国农村科技,2014(5):25-28.
[11]朱文涛.基于创新方法分析路径的创新系统研究[D].上海:上海交通大学,2016:42-44.