创新价值链视角下制造业的创新效率——以河北省为例
|
摘要
创新活动是多主体参与、多阶段、多投入、多产出的一个复杂过程,创新价值链分为技术产出、产品产出、效益产出三个环节。运用改进的三阶段数据包络分析方法测算全国31个区域(未包括香港、澳门和台湾)及河北省29个制造行业各环节的创新效率,结果表明,河北省处于全国制造业创新效率的第二梯队,与全国其他地区相比,在技术产出环节的创新效率较低,效益产出环节中有两项也低于全国平均水平,在产品产出环节创新效率较高;其29个制造行业可分成创新高效率型、中效率型和低效率型三种。在当前京津冀协同发展的机遇下,河北省应支持高效率型行业完善创新网络,促进低效率型行业资源整合,借力京津创新资源促进产业转型升级。
The innovative activity is a complicated process with multiple main players,stages,inputs and outputs;and the innovative value chain can be divided as such three links as technological output,product output,and profit output.With the help of improved three-stage DEA method,the authors measure the innovative efficiency of 31 regions in China(Hong Kong,Macau,and Taiwan are not included) and 29 manufacturing industries in Hebei.It is found that:Hebei is the third echelon in terms of innovative efficiency,the innovative efficiency of technological output is comparatively low,two indexes of profit output is lower than the national average,and the innovative efficiency of product output is comparatively high;and the 29 manufacturing industries in Hebei can be divided into innovative high efficiency,media efficiency and low efficiency.Facing the opportunity of coordinated development in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region,Hebei province should give more support to high efficiency industries to improve innovative network,promote the resources integration of industries with low efficiency,and promote the industrial transformation and upgrade with the help of innovative resources of Beijing and Tianjin.
The innovative activity is a complicated process with multiple main players,stages,inputs and outputs;and the innovative value chain can be divided as such three links as technological output,product output,and profit output.With the help of improved three-stage DEA method,the authors measure the innovative efficiency of 31 regions in China(Hong Kong,Macau,and Taiwan are not included) and 29 manufacturing industries in Hebei.It is found that:Hebei is the third echelon in terms of innovative efficiency,the innovative efficiency of technological output is comparatively low,two indexes of profit output is lower than the national average,and the innovative efficiency of product output is comparatively high;and the 29 manufacturing industries in Hebei can be divided into innovative high efficiency,media efficiency and low efficiency.Facing the opportunity of coordinated development in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region,Hebei province should give more support to high efficiency industries to improve innovative network,promote the resources integration of industries with low efficiency,and promote the industrial transformation and upgrade with the help of innovative resources of Beijing and Tianjin.
引文
[1]王文,牛泽东.中国装备制造业技术创新的静态与动态效率——基于二位码行业数据的分析[J].经济管理,2014(5):24-36.
[2]梁合,雷社平.我国七大装备制造业技术创新效率研究[J].科技与经济,2015(2):26-30.
[3]朱爱辉,陈富民.基于DEA模型的湖南制造业技术创新效率研究[J].科技与管理,2015,17(1):85-90.
[4]牛泽东,张倩肖.中国装备制造业的技术创新效率[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2012(11):51-67.
[5]黄山松,谭清美.不同要素密集型制造业创新效率变动的实证分析[J].武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版),2011(2):27-33.
[6]段婕,刘勇,王艳红.基于DEA改进模型的装备制造业技术创新效率实证研究[J].科技进步与对策,2012(3):65-69.
[7]代碧波,孙东生,姚凤阁.我国制造业技术创新效率的变动及其影响因素——基于2001—2008年29个行业的面板数据分析[J].情报杂志,2012,31(3):185-191.
[8]王章豹,孙陈.我国装备制造业行业技术创新效率测度研究[J].中国科技论坛,2007(8):28-33.
[9]STUART T E.Network positions and propensities to collaborate:an investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry[J].Administrative science,2012,9(3):668-698.
[10]ZHANG T B.The driving effects and conduction paths of Chinese high-tech industry on national economy[J].Journal of applied economics&business research,2015,10(3):130-147.
[11]WANG Y Q,JIN Q Y,GONG Y F,SUN M M.The improvement of independent innovation capability in petroleum equipment manufacturing industry based on knowledge integration[J].Advanced materials research,2013(14):1080-1084.
[12]王艳,周晶晶.我国通信设备制造业创新效率的再测度——基于链式关联网络DEA[J].科技管理研究,2016(6):141-147.
[13]齐园,张永安.基于因子分析与DEA模型的高技术产业技术效率的实证研究——以北京为例[J].科技管理研究,2014,34(4):43-47.
[14]李廉水,程中华,刘军.中国制造业“新型化”及其评价研究[J].中国工业经济,2015(2):63-75.
[15]L?vbrand O U E.Rendering global change problematic:the constitutive effects of earth system research in the IGBP and the IHDP[J].Environmental politics,2013,4(2):61-65.
[2]梁合,雷社平.我国七大装备制造业技术创新效率研究[J].科技与经济,2015(2):26-30.
[3]朱爱辉,陈富民.基于DEA模型的湖南制造业技术创新效率研究[J].科技与管理,2015,17(1):85-90.
[4]牛泽东,张倩肖.中国装备制造业的技术创新效率[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2012(11):51-67.
[5]黄山松,谭清美.不同要素密集型制造业创新效率变动的实证分析[J].武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版),2011(2):27-33.
[6]段婕,刘勇,王艳红.基于DEA改进模型的装备制造业技术创新效率实证研究[J].科技进步与对策,2012(3):65-69.
[7]代碧波,孙东生,姚凤阁.我国制造业技术创新效率的变动及其影响因素——基于2001—2008年29个行业的面板数据分析[J].情报杂志,2012,31(3):185-191.
[8]王章豹,孙陈.我国装备制造业行业技术创新效率测度研究[J].中国科技论坛,2007(8):28-33.
[9]STUART T E.Network positions and propensities to collaborate:an investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry[J].Administrative science,2012,9(3):668-698.
[10]ZHANG T B.The driving effects and conduction paths of Chinese high-tech industry on national economy[J].Journal of applied economics&business research,2015,10(3):130-147.
[11]WANG Y Q,JIN Q Y,GONG Y F,SUN M M.The improvement of independent innovation capability in petroleum equipment manufacturing industry based on knowledge integration[J].Advanced materials research,2013(14):1080-1084.
[12]王艳,周晶晶.我国通信设备制造业创新效率的再测度——基于链式关联网络DEA[J].科技管理研究,2016(6):141-147.
[13]齐园,张永安.基于因子分析与DEA模型的高技术产业技术效率的实证研究——以北京为例[J].科技管理研究,2014,34(4):43-47.
[14]李廉水,程中华,刘军.中国制造业“新型化”及其评价研究[J].中国工业经济,2015(2):63-75.
[15]L?vbrand O U E.Rendering global change problematic:the constitutive effects of earth system research in the IGBP and the IHDP[J].Environmental politics,2013,4(2):61-65.