摘要
以六水硝酸锌、六水硝酸铈、氧化石墨烯为原料,采用溶胶凝胶法制备了氧化石墨烯(GO)改性ZnO/CeO_2复合纳米紫外屏蔽剂。采用X射线衍射(XRD)、扫描电镜(SEM)、傅立叶变换红外光谱(FTIR)、紫外可见分光光度计(UV-Vis)等测试手段对产物的结构、组成及形貌进行表征,研究了氧化铈与氧化锌摩尔比、GO投入量、屏蔽剂用量以及pH值对复合纳米材料紫外屏蔽性能的影响,探索了氧化石墨烯改性ZnO/CeO_2复合纳米的最佳制备条件。结果表明:氧化石墨烯改性ZnO/CeO_2复合纳米材料中GO、CeO_2、ZnO的平均粒径分别为8. 3、15. 4、37. 5 nm。当pH 6. 0、氧化铈与氧化锌摩尔比为4∶1、GO投入量为2. 0g、屏蔽剂用量为0. 06 g/L时,紫外屏蔽性能强弱顺序为:氧化石墨烯改性ZnO/CeO_2复合纳米材料> GO>ZnO/CeO_2复合纳米材料> CeO_2> ZnO。
An outstanding UV-shielding agent based on graphene oxide modified ZnO//CeO_2 nanocomposites was prepared by sol-gel method using zinc nitrate hexahydrate,ceric nitrate hexahydrate and graphene oxide( GO) as raw materials. The structure,composition and morphology of the as-prepared sample were characterized by X-ray diffraction( XRD),scanning electron microscopy( SEM),Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy( FT-IR) and ultraviolet and? visible spectrophotometry( UVVis). The influences of molar ratio of cerium oxide to zinc oxide,mass of graphene oxide,amount of shielding agent loaded and pH value on the UV-shielding performance of the GO/ZnO//CeO_2 nanocomposites were investigated. The average sizes for GO,/CeO_2 and ZnO in the graphene oxide modified ZnO//CeO_2 nanocomposites were 8. 3,15. 4 and 37. 5 nm,respectively. The optimum conditions were as follows: p H value: 6. 0,molar ratio of cerium oxide to zinc oxide: 4 ∶ 1,mass of graphene oxide: 2. 0 g,amount of shielding agent loaded: 0. 06 g/L. Under the optimal conditions,the sequence for UV-shielding performances of the agents were as follows: graphene oxide modified ZnO//CeO_2 nanocomposites > GO > ZnO//CeO_2 nanocomposites > /CeO_2> ZnO.
引文
[1]Zhao X,Yang S F,Zhao J Z,Liu Y H,Xu H F,Wang Z C.Chem.J.Chin.Univ.(赵旭,杨少凤,赵敬哲,刘艳华,徐慧芳,王子忱.高等学校化学学报),2000,21(11):1617-1620.
[2]Ren J,Wang S,Gao C.Cellulose,2015,22(1):593-602.
[3]Pal M K,Singh B,Gautam J.J.Therm.Anal.Calorim.,2012,107(1):85-96.
[4]Hu J,Zhou Y,Sheng X.J.Sol-Gel Sci.Technol.,2015,74(1):181-186.
[5]Chouhan S,Bajpai A K,Bajpai J,Katare R,Dhoble S J.Polym.Bull.,2017,74:4119-4141.
[6]Gowri V S,Almeida L,Mtp D A,Pacheco N C,Souto A P,Esteves M F,Sanghi S K.J.Mater.Sci.,2010,45(9):2427-2435.
[7]Dai Y,Hou Y K,Long Z Q,Huang X W,Cui D L.J.Chin.Rare Earth Soc.(戴艳,侯永可,龙志奇,黄小卫,崔大立.中国稀土学报),2011,29(2):195-200.
[8]Bahadur N M,Kurayama F,Furusawa T,Sato M,Siddiquey I A,Hossain M M,Suzuki N.J.Nanopart.Res.,2013,15(1):1-11.
[9]Wu W W,Li S S,Liao S,Xiang F,Wu X H.Rare Metals,2010,29(2):149-153.
[10]Chai X J,Wang D J.J.Wuhan Univ.Technol.:Mater.Sci.Ed.,2007,22(4):622-625.
[11]Li C,Zhu J,Bi H P,Meng X Q,Yao P C,Han Q F.J.Wuhan Univ.Technol.:Mater.Sci.Ed.,2015,30(5):947-950.
[12]Xu J,Wang Y,Hu S.Microchim.Acta,2016,184(1):1-44.
[13]Deng Y,Liu K,Cao H,Luo M,Yan H.J.Iranian Chem.Soc.,2015,12(5):807-814.
[14]Almeida N A,Martins P M,Teixeira S,Silva J L,Sencadas V,Kühn K,Cuniberti G,Lanceros S,Marques P.J.Mater.Sci.,2016,51(14):6974-6986.
[15]Giardi R,Porro S,Chiolerio A,Celasco E,Sangermano M.J.Mater.Sci.,2013,48(3):1249-1255.
[16]Ji Z,Feng L,Kong L,Shen X P,Wang J H,Xu K Q,Yue X Y.J.Mater.Sci.,2017,52(10):6100-6110.
[17]Nguyen V N,Tran D T,Nguyen M T,Le T T,Ha M N,Nguyen M N,Pham T D.Res.Chem.Intermed.,2018,44(5):1-15.
[18]Yao C L,Jin T,Qi C X,Zhu J M,Chen C,Shen Y H,Xie A J,Li H Y.J.Instrum.Anal.(姚成立,金涛,齐春霞,朱金苗,陈琛,沈玉华,谢安建,李红英.分析测试学报),2016,35(2):249-256.
[19]Guo Y T,Li X Y,Gao S Q,Gu H D,Zhang Z E.J.Instrum.Anal.(郭宇彤,李欣悦,高仕谦,顾海东,张占恩.分析测试学报),2016,35(11):1384-1389.
[20]Almeida N A,Martins P M,Teixeira S,Silva J,Sencadas V,Kühn K,Cuniberti G,Mendez S L,Marques P A.J.Mater.Sci.,2016,51(14):6974-6986.
[21]Zhang Y,Pan C.J.Mater.Sci.,2011,46(8):2622-2626.
[22]Zhao M,Sun Y,Lv J,Cao L,Jiang Y Y,He G,Zhang M,Sun Z Q,Chen X S.J.Mater.Sci.Mater.Electron.,2016,27(9):9131-9135.