公众对森林结构属性的偏好研究进展
|
摘要
为研究森林结构属性的公众偏好,以Science Direct与中国知网(www.cnki.net)为文献来源数据库,以"forest structure attribute""public preference"与"林内景观"为关键词,检索国内外森林结构属性研究的基本概况。就树种、树的大小、林木空间分布变化、采伐与林木覆盖范围、地被物与枯树倒木、可视性、林缘的自然性、沿森林小径行走时的林分变化等10个森林结构属性的公众偏好进行了综述。构建了基于水平空间、垂直空间和全空间为一体的林内森林结构属性旅游吸引物框架体系,并就未来公众对森林结构属性偏好的研究提出思考。图1参73
From the database of Science Direct and China National Knowledge Internet(CNKI), this paper took the public preference for forest structure attributes as the object, used forest structure attribute, public preference and intra-forest landscape as key words, and focused on public preferences for 10 major forest structural attributes, for instance, number of tree species, size of trees, tree spacing, clear-cuts, extent of tree cover, ground cover, deadwood(standing and fallen), visual penetration through stand, ‘Naturalness' of forest edges, and variation between stands along a trail through forest. Then, an intra-forest structural attribute tourism attraction framework system was constructed according to the attributes distributed in the horizontal, vertical and full space in the forest. And the comments put forward were great of significance to better carry out the new forestry development concept and promote the sustainable development of forest tourism in China in the future. [Ch, 1 fig. 73 ref.]
From the database of Science Direct and China National Knowledge Internet(CNKI), this paper took the public preference for forest structure attributes as the object, used forest structure attribute, public preference and intra-forest landscape as key words, and focused on public preferences for 10 major forest structural attributes, for instance, number of tree species, size of trees, tree spacing, clear-cuts, extent of tree cover, ground cover, deadwood(standing and fallen), visual penetration through stand, ‘Naturalness' of forest edges, and variation between stands along a trail through forest. Then, an intra-forest structural attribute tourism attraction framework system was constructed according to the attributes distributed in the horizontal, vertical and full space in the forest. And the comments put forward were great of significance to better carry out the new forestry development concept and promote the sustainable development of forest tourism in China in the future. [Ch, 1 fig. 73 ref.]
引文
[1]罗芬,黄清麟,张寅,等.森林旅游资源分类与调查及评价研究进展[J].世界林业研究, 2014, 27(6):8-13.LUO Fen, HUANG Qinglin, ZHANG Yin, et al. Research progress on classification, investigation and e valuation of forest tourism resources[J]. World For Res, 2014, 27(6):8-13.
[2]LUO Fen, MOYLE B D, BAO Jigang, et al. The role of institutions in the production of space for tourism:National Forest Parks in China[J]. For Policy Econ, 2016, 70(3):47-55.
[3]YARROW C. A preliminary survey of the public’s concepts of amenity in British forestry[J]. Forestry, 1966, 39(1):59-67.
[4]DUFFIELD J W. Silviculture need not be ugly[J]. For Res, 1970, 68(8):464-467.
[5]DANIEL T C, BOSTER R S. Measuring landscape esthetics:the scenic beauty estimation method[EB/OL].[2018-07-08]. https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/20911.
[6]RIBE R G. The Scenic Impact of Key Forest Attributes and Long-term Management Alternatives for Hardwood Forests:Proceedings, 8th Central Hardwood Forest Conference, March 4-6, 1991[R]. Pennsylvania:Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, 1991.
[7]EDWARDS D, JAY M, JENSEN F S, et al. Public preferences for structural attributes of forests:towards a pan-European perspective[J]. For Polic Econ, 2012, 19:12-19.
[8]GIERGICZNY M, CZAJKOWSKI M,ZYLICZ T, et al. Choice experiment assessment of public preferences for forest structural attributes[J]. Ecol Econ, 2015, 119:8-23.
[9]姜孟霞.森林的结构与调整[J].林业经济问题, 2010, 30(6):550-555.JIANG Mengxia. The forest structure and adjustment[J]. Issues For Econ, 2010, 30(6):550-555.
[10]惠刚盈.基于相邻木关系的林分空间结构参数应用研究[J].北京林业大学学报, 2013, 35(4):1-9.HUI Gangying. Studies on the application of stand spatial structure parameters based on the relationship of neighborhood trees[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2013, 35(4):1-9.
[11]惠刚盈,胡艳波,赵中华.结构化森林经营研究进展[J].林业科学研究, 2018, 31(1):85-93.HUI Gangying, HU Yanbo, ZHAO Zhonghua. Research progress of structure-based forest management[J]. For Res,2018, 31(1):85-93.
[12]陆兆苏,余国宝,张治强,等.紫金山风景林的动态及其经营对策[J].南京林学院学报, 1985, 6(3):1-12.LU Zhaosu, YU Guobao, ZHANG Zhiqiang, et al. The dynamics of the scenic forest of the Zijin Mountain and the management concerned[J]. J Nanjing Inst For, 1985, 6(3):1-12.
[13]周国模,李金满.千岛湖国家森林公园自然风景质量评价[J].浙江林学院学报, 1989, 6(4):387-393.ZHOU Guomo, LI Jinman. Landscape preference in Qiandao Lake National Park[J]. J Zhejiang For Coll, 1989, 6(4):387-393.
[14]赵德海.风景林美学评价方法的研究[J].南京林业大学学报, 1990, 14(4):50-55.ZHAO Dehai. An aesthetic evaluation of scenic forest[J]. J Nanjing For Univ, 1990, 14(4):50-55.
[15]陈鑫峰,王雁.国内外森林景观的定量评价和经营技术研究现状[J].世界林业研究, 2000, 13(5):31-38.CHEN Xinfeng, WANG Yan. Present studying situation on quantitative estimation and management technique of forest landscapes[J]. World For Res, 2000, 13(5):31-38.
[16]张荣,翟明普,阎海平.国内外风景游憩林抚育研究进展[J].北京林业大学学报, 2004, 26(2):109-113.ZHANG Rong, ZHAI Mingpu, YAN Haiping. Advances of scenic recreational forest tending at home and abroad[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2004, 26(2):109-113.
[17]陈鑫峰,王雁.森林美剖析:主论森林植物的形式美[J].林业科学, 2001, 37(2):122-130.CHEN Xinfeng, WANG Yan. An analytic study on forest beauty-mostly on form beauty of forest plants[J]. Sci Silv Sin, 2001, 37(2):122-130.
[18]陈鑫峰,贾黎明.京西山区森林林内景观评价研究[J].林业科学, 2003, 39(4):59-66.CHEN Xinfeng, JIA Liming. Research on evaluation of in-forest landscapes in West Beijing Mountain area[J]. Sci Silv Sin, 2003, 39(4):59-66.
[19]韦新良,何莹.森林景观效果生成因子的相关性[J].浙江农林大学学报, 2011, 28(5):701-705.WEI Xinliang, HE Ying. A correlation study of generation factors for forest landscape effects[J]. J Zhejiang A&F Univ, 2011, 28(5):701-705.
[20]梁爽,张洁,戚继忠,等.次生林为主的自然风景林林内景观质量评价[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(6):119-124.LIANG Shuang, ZHANG Jie, QI Jizhong, et al. The forest landscape quality evaluation of the natural scenic beauty mainly made of secondary forest[J]. J Nanjing For Univ Nat Sci Ed, 2015, 39(6):119-124.
[21]俞晓凌,廖邦洪,王道模,等.龙门山国家地质公园天台山风景游憩林空间结构分析与美景度评价[J].林业科学, 2011, 47(7):50-56.YU Xiaoling, LIAO Banghong, WANG Daomo, et al. Spatial structure and scenic beauty estimation of scenic-recreational forests of the Tiantai Mountain in Longmenshan National Geopark, Sichuan[J]. Sci Silv Sin, 2011, 47(7):50-56.
[22]HEGETSCHWEILER K T, de VRIES S, ARNBERGER A, et al. Linking demand and supply factors in identifying cultural ecosystem services of urban green infrastructures:a review of European studies[J]. Urban For Urban Greening, 2017, 21:48-59.
[23]HEGETSCHWEILER K T, PLUM C, FISCHER C, et al. Towards a comprehensive social and natural scientific forestrecreation monitoring instrument:a prototypical approach[J]. Landscape Urban Plann, 2017, 167(11):84-97.
[24]LINDHAGEN A. An approach to clarifying public preferences about silvicultural systems:a case study concerning group selection and clear-cutting[J]. Scand J For Res, 1996, 11(1/4):375-387.
[25]UEDA H, NAKAJIMA T, TAKAYAMA N, et al. Landscape image sketches of forests in Japan and Russia[J]. For Policy Econ, 2012, 19:20-30.
[26]毛斌,徐程扬,陈瑜,等. AHP法在风景林林内景观质量评价中的应用[J].西北林学院学报, 2014, 29(3):204-209.MAO Bin, XU Chengyang, CHEN Yu, et al. Application of analytic hierarchy process to the evaluation of in-forest landscape quality in scenic forest[J]. J Northwest For Univ, 2014, 29(3):204-209.
[27]李俊英,闫红伟,唐强,等.天然次生林林内景观评价模型[J].浙江林学院学报, 2010, 27(6):923-927.LI Junying, YAN Hongwei, TANG Qiang, et al. A scenic beauty estimation model for a natural secondary forest[J]. J Zhejiang For Coll, 2010, 27(6):923-927.
[28]梅光义,孙玉军,林方,等.基于ANP的杉木风景游憩林评价指标体系[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2013, 33(2):110-114.MEI Guangyi, SUN Yujun, LIN Fang, et al. Study on evaluation index system of Cunninghamia lanceolata scenic and recreational forests based on analytic network process[J]. J Cent South Univ For Technol, 2013, 33(2):110-114.
[29]RIBE R G. The aesthetics of forestry:what has empirical preference research taught us?[J]. Environ Manage, 1989,13(1):55-74.
[30]DANIEL T C, SCHROEDER H. Scenic beauty estimation model:predicting perceived beauty of forest landscapes[C]//ELSNER G H, SMARDON R C. Proceedings of Our National Landscape:A Conference on Applied Techniques for Analysis and Management of the Visual Resource. Berkeley:United States Department of Agriculture, 1979:514-523.
[31]陈鑫峰,贾黎明,王雁,等.京西山区风景游憩林季相景观评价及经营技术原则[J].北京林业大学学报,2008, 30(4):39-45.CHEN Xinfeng, JIA Liming, WANG Yan, et al. Landscape estimation and management technique principles of different seasonal scenic and recreational forests in West Mountain, Beijing[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2008, 30(4):39-45.
[32]HYT?NEN M. Multiple-use Forestry in the Nordic Countries[M]. Helsinki:The Finnish Forest Research Institute,1995:279-294.
[33]PUKKALA T, KELLOM?KI S. Simulation as a tool in designing forest landscape[J]. Landscape Urban Plann, 1988,16(3):253-260.
[34]PARSONS R, DANIEL T C. Good looking:in defense of scenic landscape aesthetics[J]. Landscape Urban Plann,2002, 60(1):43-56.
[35]MüDERRISOG?LU H, ERO?LU E,?ZKAN ?, et al. Visual perception of tree forms[J]. Build Environ, 2006, 41(6):796-806.
[36]GUNDERSEN V S, FRIVOLD L H. Public preferences for forest structures:a review of quantitative surveys from Finland, Norway and Sweden[J]. Urban For Urban Greening, 2008, 7(4):241-258.
[37]BLASCO E, GONZáLEZ-OLABARRIA J R, RODRIGUéZ-VEIGA P, et al. Predicting scenic beauty of forest stands in Catalonia(North-east Spain)[J]. J For Res, 2009, 20(1):73-78.
[38]HULL R B, BUHYOFF G J. The scenic beauty temporal distribution method:an attempt to make scenic beauty assessments compatible with forest planning efforts[J]. For Sci, 1986, 32(2):271-286.
[39]WOLLIS K G, GARROD G, SCARPA R, et al. The social and environmental benefits of forests in Great Britain[C]//Social&Environmental Benefits of Forestry. Edinburgh:Centre for Research in Environmental Appraisal&Management University of Newcastle, 2003.
[40]EDWARDS D, JAY M, JENSEN F, et al. Deliverable D2.3.3:Public Preferences for Silvicultural Attributes of European forests[R]. Joensuu:European Forest Institute, 2011.
[41]RIBE R G. A general model for understanding the perception of scenic beauty in Northern Hardwood forests[J].Landscape J, 1990, 9(2):86-101.
[42]SILVENNOINEN H, ALHO J, KOLEHMAINEN O, et al. Prediction models of landscape preferences at the forest stand level[J]. Landscape Urban Plann, 2001, 56(1/2):11-20.
[43]TYRVAINEN L, PAULEIT S, SEELAND K, et al. Benefits and uses of urban forests and trees[M]//KONIJNENDIJK C, NILSSON K, RANDRUP T, et al. Urban Forests and Trees. Berlin:Springer, 2005:81-114.
[44]LEE T R. Perceptions, Attitudes and Preferences in Forests and Woodlands[M]. Surrey:Forest Research, The Research Communications Officer, 2001.
[45]GOBSTER P H. An ecological aesthetic for forest landscape management[J]. Landscape J, 1999, 18(1):54-64.
[46]BRUSH R O. The attractiveness of woodlands:perceptions of forest landowners in Massachusetts[J]. For Sci, 1979,25(3):495-506.
[47]BROWN T C, DANIEL T C. Modeling forest scenic beauty:concepts and application to ponderosa pine[EB/OL].(1984-06-10)[2018-06-06]. https://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs_rm/rm_rp256.pdf.
[48]BROWN T C, DANIEL T C. Predicting scenic beauty of timber stands[J]. For Sci, 1986, 32(2):471-487.
[49]ARTHUR L M. Predicting scenic beauty of forest environments:some empirical tests[J]. For Sci, 1977, 23(2):151-160.
[50]GUNDERSEN V, FRIVOLD L H, L?FSTR?M I, et al. Urban woodland management:the case of 13 major Nordic cities[J]. Urban For Urban Greening, 2005, 3(3/4):189-202.
[51]SILVENNOINEN H, PUKKALA T, TAHVANAINEN L. Effect of cuttings on the scenic beauty of a tree stand[J].Scand J For Res, 2002, 17(3):263-273.
[52]VODAK M C, ROBERTS P L, WELLMAN J D, et al. Scenic impacts of eastern hardwood management[J]. For Sci,1985, 31(2):289-301.
[53]KARJALAINEN E. Scenic preferences concerning clear-fell areas in Finland[J]. Landscape Res, 1996, 21(2):159-173.
[54]T?NNES S, KARJALAINEN E, L?FSTR?M I, et al. Scenic impacts of retention trees in clear-cutting areas[J].Scand J For Res, 2004, 19(4):348-357.
[55]SHAFER E L Jr, MIETZ J D. It seems possible to quantify scenic beauty in photographs[EB/OL].(2007-10-19)[2018-06-05]. https://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/8340.
[56]RIBE R G. In-stand scenic beauty of variable retention harvests and mature forests in the U.S. Pacific Northwest:the effects of basal area, density, retention pattern and down wood[J]. J Environ Manage, 2010, 91(1):245-260.
[57]BRUNSON M W, REITER D K. Effects of ecological information on judgments about scenic impacts of timber harvest[J]. J Environ Manage, 1996, 46(1):31-41.
[58]董建文.福建中、南亚热带风景游憩林构建基础研究[D].北京:北京林业大学, 2006.DONG Jianwen. Study on the Infrastructure of Scenic-recreational Forest in Mid-subtropics and Lower Subtropics of Fujian Province[D]. Beijing:Beijing Forestry University, 2006.
[59]HUNZIKER M, KIENAST F. Potential impacts of changing agricultural activities on scenic beauty:a prototypical technique for automated rapid assessment[J]. Landscape Ecol, 1999, 14(2):161-176.
[60]HERZOG T R, KUTZLI G E. Preference and perceived danger in field/forest settings[J]. Environ Behav, 2002, 34(6):819-835.
[61]GUNDERSEN V, STANGE E E, KALTENBORN B P, et al. Public visual preferences for dead wood in natural boreal forests:the effects of added information[J]. Landscape Urban Plann, 2017, 158(2):12-24.
[62]RYDBERG D, FALCK J. Urban forestry in Sweden from a silvicultural perspective:a review[J]. Landscape Urban Plann, 2000, 47(1/2):1-18.
[63]TAHVANAINEN L, TYRVAINEN L, IHALAINEN M, et al. Forest management and public perceptions-visual versus verbal information[J]. Landscape Urban Plann, 2001, 53(1/4):53-70.
[64]KELLOM?KI S, SAVOLAINEN R. The scenic value of the forest landscape as assessed in the field and the laboratory[J]. Landscape Plann, 1984, 11(2):97-107.
[65]HERZOG T R, KIRK K M. Pathway curvature and border visibility as predictors of preference and danger in forest settings[J]. Environ Behav, 2005, 37(5):620-639.
[66]COLES R W, BUSSEY S C. Urban forest landscapes in the UK:progressing the social agenda[J]. Landscape Urban Plann, 2000, 52(2/3):181-188.
[67]JAPELJ A, MAVSAR R, HODGES D, et al. Latent preferences of residents regarding an urban forest recreation setting in Ljubljana, Slovenia[J]. For Policy Econ, 2016, 71:71-79.
[68]SCHROEDER H W, DANIEL T C. Progress in predicting the perceived scenic beauty of forest landscapes[J]. For Sci, 1981, 27(1):71-80.
[69]BUHYOFF G J, HULL R B, LIEN J N, et al. Prediction of scenic quality for southern pine stands[J]. For Sci, 1986,32(32):769-778.
[70]罗芬,李雪丽,李书献,等.国外森林结构属性公众偏好的影响因素研究进展[J].林业资源管理, 2018(3):133-140.LUO Fen, LI Xueli, LI Shuxian, et al. Literature review on factors of public preference on forest structure attributes[J]. For Resour Manage, 2018(3):133-140.
[71]王洪俊.城市森林结构对空气负离子水平的影响[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 28(5):96-98.WANG Hongjun. Effects of structure of urban forestry on aero-anion concentration[J]. J Nanjing For Univ Nat Sci Ed, 2004, 28(5):96-98.
[72]陈飞平,廖为明.森林声景观评价指标体系构建的探讨[J].林业科学, 2012, 48(4):56-60.CHEN Feiping, LIAO Weiming. Construction of an evaluation index system on the forest soundscape[J]. Sci Silv Sin, 2012, 48(4):56-60.
[73]王子,荣媛,李明阳,等.森林景观色彩评价研究[J].世界林业研究, 2017, 30(3):41-45.WANG Zi, RONG Yuan, LI Mingyang, et al. A review of forest landscape color evaluation[J]. World For Res, 2017,30(3):41-45.
[2]LUO Fen, MOYLE B D, BAO Jigang, et al. The role of institutions in the production of space for tourism:National Forest Parks in China[J]. For Policy Econ, 2016, 70(3):47-55.
[3]YARROW C. A preliminary survey of the public’s concepts of amenity in British forestry[J]. Forestry, 1966, 39(1):59-67.
[4]DUFFIELD J W. Silviculture need not be ugly[J]. For Res, 1970, 68(8):464-467.
[5]DANIEL T C, BOSTER R S. Measuring landscape esthetics:the scenic beauty estimation method[EB/OL].[2018-07-08]. https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/20911.
[6]RIBE R G. The Scenic Impact of Key Forest Attributes and Long-term Management Alternatives for Hardwood Forests:Proceedings, 8th Central Hardwood Forest Conference, March 4-6, 1991[R]. Pennsylvania:Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, 1991.
[7]EDWARDS D, JAY M, JENSEN F S, et al. Public preferences for structural attributes of forests:towards a pan-European perspective[J]. For Polic Econ, 2012, 19:12-19.
[8]GIERGICZNY M, CZAJKOWSKI M,ZYLICZ T, et al. Choice experiment assessment of public preferences for forest structural attributes[J]. Ecol Econ, 2015, 119:8-23.
[9]姜孟霞.森林的结构与调整[J].林业经济问题, 2010, 30(6):550-555.JIANG Mengxia. The forest structure and adjustment[J]. Issues For Econ, 2010, 30(6):550-555.
[10]惠刚盈.基于相邻木关系的林分空间结构参数应用研究[J].北京林业大学学报, 2013, 35(4):1-9.HUI Gangying. Studies on the application of stand spatial structure parameters based on the relationship of neighborhood trees[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2013, 35(4):1-9.
[11]惠刚盈,胡艳波,赵中华.结构化森林经营研究进展[J].林业科学研究, 2018, 31(1):85-93.HUI Gangying, HU Yanbo, ZHAO Zhonghua. Research progress of structure-based forest management[J]. For Res,2018, 31(1):85-93.
[12]陆兆苏,余国宝,张治强,等.紫金山风景林的动态及其经营对策[J].南京林学院学报, 1985, 6(3):1-12.LU Zhaosu, YU Guobao, ZHANG Zhiqiang, et al. The dynamics of the scenic forest of the Zijin Mountain and the management concerned[J]. J Nanjing Inst For, 1985, 6(3):1-12.
[13]周国模,李金满.千岛湖国家森林公园自然风景质量评价[J].浙江林学院学报, 1989, 6(4):387-393.ZHOU Guomo, LI Jinman. Landscape preference in Qiandao Lake National Park[J]. J Zhejiang For Coll, 1989, 6(4):387-393.
[14]赵德海.风景林美学评价方法的研究[J].南京林业大学学报, 1990, 14(4):50-55.ZHAO Dehai. An aesthetic evaluation of scenic forest[J]. J Nanjing For Univ, 1990, 14(4):50-55.
[15]陈鑫峰,王雁.国内外森林景观的定量评价和经营技术研究现状[J].世界林业研究, 2000, 13(5):31-38.CHEN Xinfeng, WANG Yan. Present studying situation on quantitative estimation and management technique of forest landscapes[J]. World For Res, 2000, 13(5):31-38.
[16]张荣,翟明普,阎海平.国内外风景游憩林抚育研究进展[J].北京林业大学学报, 2004, 26(2):109-113.ZHANG Rong, ZHAI Mingpu, YAN Haiping. Advances of scenic recreational forest tending at home and abroad[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2004, 26(2):109-113.
[17]陈鑫峰,王雁.森林美剖析:主论森林植物的形式美[J].林业科学, 2001, 37(2):122-130.CHEN Xinfeng, WANG Yan. An analytic study on forest beauty-mostly on form beauty of forest plants[J]. Sci Silv Sin, 2001, 37(2):122-130.
[18]陈鑫峰,贾黎明.京西山区森林林内景观评价研究[J].林业科学, 2003, 39(4):59-66.CHEN Xinfeng, JIA Liming. Research on evaluation of in-forest landscapes in West Beijing Mountain area[J]. Sci Silv Sin, 2003, 39(4):59-66.
[19]韦新良,何莹.森林景观效果生成因子的相关性[J].浙江农林大学学报, 2011, 28(5):701-705.WEI Xinliang, HE Ying. A correlation study of generation factors for forest landscape effects[J]. J Zhejiang A&F Univ, 2011, 28(5):701-705.
[20]梁爽,张洁,戚继忠,等.次生林为主的自然风景林林内景观质量评价[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(6):119-124.LIANG Shuang, ZHANG Jie, QI Jizhong, et al. The forest landscape quality evaluation of the natural scenic beauty mainly made of secondary forest[J]. J Nanjing For Univ Nat Sci Ed, 2015, 39(6):119-124.
[21]俞晓凌,廖邦洪,王道模,等.龙门山国家地质公园天台山风景游憩林空间结构分析与美景度评价[J].林业科学, 2011, 47(7):50-56.YU Xiaoling, LIAO Banghong, WANG Daomo, et al. Spatial structure and scenic beauty estimation of scenic-recreational forests of the Tiantai Mountain in Longmenshan National Geopark, Sichuan[J]. Sci Silv Sin, 2011, 47(7):50-56.
[22]HEGETSCHWEILER K T, de VRIES S, ARNBERGER A, et al. Linking demand and supply factors in identifying cultural ecosystem services of urban green infrastructures:a review of European studies[J]. Urban For Urban Greening, 2017, 21:48-59.
[23]HEGETSCHWEILER K T, PLUM C, FISCHER C, et al. Towards a comprehensive social and natural scientific forestrecreation monitoring instrument:a prototypical approach[J]. Landscape Urban Plann, 2017, 167(11):84-97.
[24]LINDHAGEN A. An approach to clarifying public preferences about silvicultural systems:a case study concerning group selection and clear-cutting[J]. Scand J For Res, 1996, 11(1/4):375-387.
[25]UEDA H, NAKAJIMA T, TAKAYAMA N, et al. Landscape image sketches of forests in Japan and Russia[J]. For Policy Econ, 2012, 19:20-30.
[26]毛斌,徐程扬,陈瑜,等. AHP法在风景林林内景观质量评价中的应用[J].西北林学院学报, 2014, 29(3):204-209.MAO Bin, XU Chengyang, CHEN Yu, et al. Application of analytic hierarchy process to the evaluation of in-forest landscape quality in scenic forest[J]. J Northwest For Univ, 2014, 29(3):204-209.
[27]李俊英,闫红伟,唐强,等.天然次生林林内景观评价模型[J].浙江林学院学报, 2010, 27(6):923-927.LI Junying, YAN Hongwei, TANG Qiang, et al. A scenic beauty estimation model for a natural secondary forest[J]. J Zhejiang For Coll, 2010, 27(6):923-927.
[28]梅光义,孙玉军,林方,等.基于ANP的杉木风景游憩林评价指标体系[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2013, 33(2):110-114.MEI Guangyi, SUN Yujun, LIN Fang, et al. Study on evaluation index system of Cunninghamia lanceolata scenic and recreational forests based on analytic network process[J]. J Cent South Univ For Technol, 2013, 33(2):110-114.
[29]RIBE R G. The aesthetics of forestry:what has empirical preference research taught us?[J]. Environ Manage, 1989,13(1):55-74.
[30]DANIEL T C, SCHROEDER H. Scenic beauty estimation model:predicting perceived beauty of forest landscapes[C]//ELSNER G H, SMARDON R C. Proceedings of Our National Landscape:A Conference on Applied Techniques for Analysis and Management of the Visual Resource. Berkeley:United States Department of Agriculture, 1979:514-523.
[31]陈鑫峰,贾黎明,王雁,等.京西山区风景游憩林季相景观评价及经营技术原则[J].北京林业大学学报,2008, 30(4):39-45.CHEN Xinfeng, JIA Liming, WANG Yan, et al. Landscape estimation and management technique principles of different seasonal scenic and recreational forests in West Mountain, Beijing[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2008, 30(4):39-45.
[32]HYT?NEN M. Multiple-use Forestry in the Nordic Countries[M]. Helsinki:The Finnish Forest Research Institute,1995:279-294.
[33]PUKKALA T, KELLOM?KI S. Simulation as a tool in designing forest landscape[J]. Landscape Urban Plann, 1988,16(3):253-260.
[34]PARSONS R, DANIEL T C. Good looking:in defense of scenic landscape aesthetics[J]. Landscape Urban Plann,2002, 60(1):43-56.
[35]MüDERRISOG?LU H, ERO?LU E,?ZKAN ?, et al. Visual perception of tree forms[J]. Build Environ, 2006, 41(6):796-806.
[36]GUNDERSEN V S, FRIVOLD L H. Public preferences for forest structures:a review of quantitative surveys from Finland, Norway and Sweden[J]. Urban For Urban Greening, 2008, 7(4):241-258.
[37]BLASCO E, GONZáLEZ-OLABARRIA J R, RODRIGUéZ-VEIGA P, et al. Predicting scenic beauty of forest stands in Catalonia(North-east Spain)[J]. J For Res, 2009, 20(1):73-78.
[38]HULL R B, BUHYOFF G J. The scenic beauty temporal distribution method:an attempt to make scenic beauty assessments compatible with forest planning efforts[J]. For Sci, 1986, 32(2):271-286.
[39]WOLLIS K G, GARROD G, SCARPA R, et al. The social and environmental benefits of forests in Great Britain[C]//Social&Environmental Benefits of Forestry. Edinburgh:Centre for Research in Environmental Appraisal&Management University of Newcastle, 2003.
[40]EDWARDS D, JAY M, JENSEN F, et al. Deliverable D2.3.3:Public Preferences for Silvicultural Attributes of European forests[R]. Joensuu:European Forest Institute, 2011.
[41]RIBE R G. A general model for understanding the perception of scenic beauty in Northern Hardwood forests[J].Landscape J, 1990, 9(2):86-101.
[42]SILVENNOINEN H, ALHO J, KOLEHMAINEN O, et al. Prediction models of landscape preferences at the forest stand level[J]. Landscape Urban Plann, 2001, 56(1/2):11-20.
[43]TYRVAINEN L, PAULEIT S, SEELAND K, et al. Benefits and uses of urban forests and trees[M]//KONIJNENDIJK C, NILSSON K, RANDRUP T, et al. Urban Forests and Trees. Berlin:Springer, 2005:81-114.
[44]LEE T R. Perceptions, Attitudes and Preferences in Forests and Woodlands[M]. Surrey:Forest Research, The Research Communications Officer, 2001.
[45]GOBSTER P H. An ecological aesthetic for forest landscape management[J]. Landscape J, 1999, 18(1):54-64.
[46]BRUSH R O. The attractiveness of woodlands:perceptions of forest landowners in Massachusetts[J]. For Sci, 1979,25(3):495-506.
[47]BROWN T C, DANIEL T C. Modeling forest scenic beauty:concepts and application to ponderosa pine[EB/OL].(1984-06-10)[2018-06-06]. https://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs_rm/rm_rp256.pdf.
[48]BROWN T C, DANIEL T C. Predicting scenic beauty of timber stands[J]. For Sci, 1986, 32(2):471-487.
[49]ARTHUR L M. Predicting scenic beauty of forest environments:some empirical tests[J]. For Sci, 1977, 23(2):151-160.
[50]GUNDERSEN V, FRIVOLD L H, L?FSTR?M I, et al. Urban woodland management:the case of 13 major Nordic cities[J]. Urban For Urban Greening, 2005, 3(3/4):189-202.
[51]SILVENNOINEN H, PUKKALA T, TAHVANAINEN L. Effect of cuttings on the scenic beauty of a tree stand[J].Scand J For Res, 2002, 17(3):263-273.
[52]VODAK M C, ROBERTS P L, WELLMAN J D, et al. Scenic impacts of eastern hardwood management[J]. For Sci,1985, 31(2):289-301.
[53]KARJALAINEN E. Scenic preferences concerning clear-fell areas in Finland[J]. Landscape Res, 1996, 21(2):159-173.
[54]T?NNES S, KARJALAINEN E, L?FSTR?M I, et al. Scenic impacts of retention trees in clear-cutting areas[J].Scand J For Res, 2004, 19(4):348-357.
[55]SHAFER E L Jr, MIETZ J D. It seems possible to quantify scenic beauty in photographs[EB/OL].(2007-10-19)[2018-06-05]. https://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/8340.
[56]RIBE R G. In-stand scenic beauty of variable retention harvests and mature forests in the U.S. Pacific Northwest:the effects of basal area, density, retention pattern and down wood[J]. J Environ Manage, 2010, 91(1):245-260.
[57]BRUNSON M W, REITER D K. Effects of ecological information on judgments about scenic impacts of timber harvest[J]. J Environ Manage, 1996, 46(1):31-41.
[58]董建文.福建中、南亚热带风景游憩林构建基础研究[D].北京:北京林业大学, 2006.DONG Jianwen. Study on the Infrastructure of Scenic-recreational Forest in Mid-subtropics and Lower Subtropics of Fujian Province[D]. Beijing:Beijing Forestry University, 2006.
[59]HUNZIKER M, KIENAST F. Potential impacts of changing agricultural activities on scenic beauty:a prototypical technique for automated rapid assessment[J]. Landscape Ecol, 1999, 14(2):161-176.
[60]HERZOG T R, KUTZLI G E. Preference and perceived danger in field/forest settings[J]. Environ Behav, 2002, 34(6):819-835.
[61]GUNDERSEN V, STANGE E E, KALTENBORN B P, et al. Public visual preferences for dead wood in natural boreal forests:the effects of added information[J]. Landscape Urban Plann, 2017, 158(2):12-24.
[62]RYDBERG D, FALCK J. Urban forestry in Sweden from a silvicultural perspective:a review[J]. Landscape Urban Plann, 2000, 47(1/2):1-18.
[63]TAHVANAINEN L, TYRVAINEN L, IHALAINEN M, et al. Forest management and public perceptions-visual versus verbal information[J]. Landscape Urban Plann, 2001, 53(1/4):53-70.
[64]KELLOM?KI S, SAVOLAINEN R. The scenic value of the forest landscape as assessed in the field and the laboratory[J]. Landscape Plann, 1984, 11(2):97-107.
[65]HERZOG T R, KIRK K M. Pathway curvature and border visibility as predictors of preference and danger in forest settings[J]. Environ Behav, 2005, 37(5):620-639.
[66]COLES R W, BUSSEY S C. Urban forest landscapes in the UK:progressing the social agenda[J]. Landscape Urban Plann, 2000, 52(2/3):181-188.
[67]JAPELJ A, MAVSAR R, HODGES D, et al. Latent preferences of residents regarding an urban forest recreation setting in Ljubljana, Slovenia[J]. For Policy Econ, 2016, 71:71-79.
[68]SCHROEDER H W, DANIEL T C. Progress in predicting the perceived scenic beauty of forest landscapes[J]. For Sci, 1981, 27(1):71-80.
[69]BUHYOFF G J, HULL R B, LIEN J N, et al. Prediction of scenic quality for southern pine stands[J]. For Sci, 1986,32(32):769-778.
[70]罗芬,李雪丽,李书献,等.国外森林结构属性公众偏好的影响因素研究进展[J].林业资源管理, 2018(3):133-140.LUO Fen, LI Xueli, LI Shuxian, et al. Literature review on factors of public preference on forest structure attributes[J]. For Resour Manage, 2018(3):133-140.
[71]王洪俊.城市森林结构对空气负离子水平的影响[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 28(5):96-98.WANG Hongjun. Effects of structure of urban forestry on aero-anion concentration[J]. J Nanjing For Univ Nat Sci Ed, 2004, 28(5):96-98.
[72]陈飞平,廖为明.森林声景观评价指标体系构建的探讨[J].林业科学, 2012, 48(4):56-60.CHEN Feiping, LIAO Weiming. Construction of an evaluation index system on the forest soundscape[J]. Sci Silv Sin, 2012, 48(4):56-60.
[73]王子,荣媛,李明阳,等.森林景观色彩评价研究[J].世界林业研究, 2017, 30(3):41-45.WANG Zi, RONG Yuan, LI Mingyang, et al. A review of forest landscape color evaluation[J]. World For Res, 2017,30(3):41-45.