中文期刊论文引文国际化多维分析——以图书情报与档案管理学科为例
|
摘要
【目的/意义】引文国际化能够帮助本土学者以国际视野、国际思维和国际通用的学术范式、理念、方法从事学术研究,提高研究水平,进而更好地在国际上发出中国声音、讲好中国故事。【方法/过程】以图书情报与档案管理(LIS)学科为例,选取中文社会科学引文索引(CSSCI)建库以来每年均收录的16本LIS期刊作为数据源,通过对中文期刊论文引用外文文献的语种、文献类型、来源期刊、学科领域、学术质量、时效性进行多维分析,揭示本土学者在外文文献选择与内化的过程中经历的发展与变化。基于上述指标对施引文献聚类,进一步发掘出引文国际化的主要模式。【结果/结论】被引文献中,外文占比逐年上升且英语占主导地位;被引外文文献中期刊论文占比最高,其次是网络资源、会议论文、图书和学位论文;被引频次较高的外文期刊中,多数来自LIS领域,但也有其他学科的期刊,较少数期刊获得了大多数引用;除本学科外,信息系统、计算机科学、管理科学与商学的外文文献被引较多,跨学科程度稳中有升;被引外文文献的学术质量呈上升趋势;被引外文文献的年龄呈增长趋势。此外,本研究还发现了五种各具特点的引文国际化模式。
【Purpose/significance】The internationalization of references can help domestic scholars engage in academic research with international vision, international thinking as well as international common academic paradigms, ideas and methods. So that, the research quality can be improved and the articles can be published in international journals.【Method/process】Taking Library & Information Science as the research object. Selecting 16 journals, which have been indexed by CSSCI from 1998, as the data source. Revealing the development and changes of local scholars in the process of selecting and internalizing foreign-language literatures by analyzing the language, literature type, journal, subject, academic quality and timeliness of references in Chinese journal papers. Discovering the main patterns of internationalization of references by clustering.【Result/conclusion】The research finds that the proportion of foreign-language references is increasing year by year and English is dominant; journal articles have the highest percentage in foreign-language references, the following are internet resources, conference papers, books and dissertations; most of the cited foreign journals are in the field of LIS,but there are also journals in other disciplines, very few journals possess the vast majority of citations; in addition to LIS,the foreign-language papers from information system, computer science, management science and business are cited most,the interdisciplinary degree is steadily rising; the academic quality of cited foreign-language literature is on the rise; the age of cited literatures is increasing. Furthermore, the study also finds five patterns of internationalization of references with different characteristics.
【Purpose/significance】The internationalization of references can help domestic scholars engage in academic research with international vision, international thinking as well as international common academic paradigms, ideas and methods. So that, the research quality can be improved and the articles can be published in international journals.【Method/process】Taking Library & Information Science as the research object. Selecting 16 journals, which have been indexed by CSSCI from 1998, as the data source. Revealing the development and changes of local scholars in the process of selecting and internalizing foreign-language literatures by analyzing the language, literature type, journal, subject, academic quality and timeliness of references in Chinese journal papers. Discovering the main patterns of internationalization of references by clustering.【Result/conclusion】The research finds that the proportion of foreign-language references is increasing year by year and English is dominant; journal articles have the highest percentage in foreign-language references, the following are internet resources, conference papers, books and dissertations; most of the cited foreign journals are in the field of LIS,but there are also journals in other disciplines, very few journals possess the vast majority of citations; in addition to LIS,the foreign-language papers from information system, computer science, management science and business are cited most,the interdisciplinary degree is steadily rising; the academic quality of cited foreign-language literature is on the rise; the age of cited literatures is increasing. Furthermore, the study also finds five patterns of internationalization of references with different characteristics.
引文
1龚凯乐,谢娟,成颖,等.期刊论文引文国际化研究--以图书情报与档案管理学科为例[J].情报学报,2018,37(2):151-160.
2赵星,谭旻,余小萍,等.我国文科领域知识扩散之引文网络探析[J].中国图书馆学报,2012,38(5):59-67.
3 Li L.Analysis of factors restricting the development of science and technology journals in China[J].Publishing Research Quarterly,2004,19(4):45-53.
4 Xu L,Fang Q.Internationalization of Chinese STMJournal Publishing[J].Publishing Research Quarterly,2013,29(2):190-196.
5 Zou Y,Laubichler M D.Measuring the contributions of Chinese scholars to the research field of systems biology from 2005 to 2013[J].Scientometrics,2017,110(3):1-17.
6 Moed H F.Measuring China’s research performance using the Science Citation Index[J].Scientometrics,2002,53(3):281-296.
7 Wang S,Wang H,Weldon P R.Bibliometric analysis of English-language academic journals of China and their internationalization[J].Scientometrics,2007,73(3):331-343.
8 Ren S,Rousseau R.International visibility of Chinese scientific journals[J].Scientometrics,2002,53(3)389-405.
9 Li J,Qiao L,Li W,et al.Chinese-language articles are not biased in citations:Evidences from Chinese-English bilingual journals in Scopus and Web of Science[J].Journal of Informetrics,2014,8(4):912-916.
10梁永霞,刘则渊,杨中楷.引文分析学的知识流动理论探析[J].科学学研究,2010,28(5):668-674.
11 Lockett A,Mcwilliams A.The Balance of Trade Between Disciplines:Do We Effectively Manage Knowledge?[J].Journal of Management Inquiry,2005,14(2):139-150.
12 Wu C,Yan E,Hill C.Disciplinary knowledge diffusion in business research[J].Journal of Informetrics,2017,11(2)655-668.
13 Yan E,Ding Y,Cronin B,et al.A bird's-eye view of scientific trading:Dependency relations among fields of science[J].Journal of Informetrics,2013,7(2):249-264.
14 Yan E.Disciplinary knowledge production and diffusion in science[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science&Technology,2015,67(9):2223-2245.
15 Narin F,Hamilton K S,Olivastro D.The increasing linkage between U.S.technology and public science[J].Research Policy,1997,26(3):317-330.
16 Callaert J,Grouwels J,Looy B.Delineating the scientific footprint in technology:Identifying scientific publications within non-patent references[J].Scientometrics,2012,91(2):383-398.
17 Su X,Deng S,Shen S.The design and application value of the Chinese Social Science Citation Index[J].Scientometrics,2012,98(3):1567-1582.
18 Wang H,Deng S,Su X.A study on construction and analysis of discipline knowledge structure of Chinese LIS based on CSSCI[J].Scientometrics,2016,109(3):1-35.
19王军.中外十种外科学期刊文后参考文献著录差错对比分析[J].情报科学,2008,26(1):101-103.
20朱红梅,张大志,任红.对我国高影响力医学期刊的中、英文参考文献著录差错分析[J].中国科技期刊研究,2012,23(5):784-787.
21 Norris M,Oppenheim C.Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences’literature[J].Journal of Informetrics,2007,1(2):161-169.
22 López-Illescas C,Moya-Anegón F D,Moed H F.Coverage and citation impact of oncological journals in the Web of Science,and Scopus[J].Journal of Informetrics,2008,2(4):304-316.
23 Navarro G.A guided tour to approximate string matching[J].ACM Computing Surveys,2001,33(1):31-88.
24 Leydesdorff L,Rafols I.Indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals:Diversity,centrality,and citations[J].Journal of Informetrics,2011,5(1):87-100.
25 Wu C,Yan E,Hill C.Disciplinary knowledge diffusion in business research[J].Journal of Informetrics,2017,11(2):655-668.
26 Tahamtan I,Afshar A S,Ahamdzadeh K.Factors affecting number of citations:a comprehensive review of the literature[J].Scientometrics,2016,107(3):1195-1225.
27 Ma N,Guan J,Zhao Y,et al.Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis[J].Information Processing and Management,2008,44(2):800-810.
28谢娟,龚凯乐,成颖,等.论文下载量与被引相关关系的元分析[J].情报学报,2017,36(12):1255-1269.
29 Bornmann L.Alternative metrics in scientometrics:a metaanalysis of research into three altmetrics[J].Scientometrics,2015,103(3):1123-1144.
30 Abramo G,D’Angelo C A,Costa F D.Citations versus journal impact factor as proxy of quality:could the latter ever be preferable?[J].Scientometrics,2010,84(3):821-833.
31 Dorta-Gonz,Lez P,Dorta-Gonz,et al.Comparing journals from different fields of Science and Social Science through a JCR Subject Categories Normalized Impact Factor[J].Scientometrics,2013,95(2):645-672.
32 Yu L,Yu H.Does the average JIF percentile make a difference?[J].Scientometrics,2016,109(3):1979-1987.
33 Tsay M Y.An analysis and comparison of scientometric data between journals of physics,chemistry and engineering[J]Scientometrics,2009,78(2):279-293.
34 MacQueen J.Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observationsC]//Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability.1967,1(14):281-297.
35龚凯乐,成颖,孙建军.基于参与者共现分析的博文聚类研究[J].现代图书情报技术,2016,32(10):50-58.
36 Mccallum A.Efficient clustering of high-dimensional data sets with application to reference matching[C]//International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.DBLP,2000:169-178.
37 Raschka S.Python Machine Learning[M].UK:Packt Publishing,2014:320-321.
38 Han S,Shen C,Shen X,et al.A review of the major projects constituting the China Academic Digital Library[J].The Electronic Library,2008,26(1):39-54.
39 Meneghini R,Packer A L.Is there science beyond English?Initiatives to increase the quality and visibility of non-English publications might help to break down language barriers in scientific communication[J].Embo Reports,2007,8(8)112-116.
40 Gl?nzel W,Schoepflin U.A bibliometric study of reference literature in the sciences and social sciences[J].Information Processing&Management,1999,35(1):31-44.
41 Earle P,Vickery B.Social science literature use in the UKas indicated by citations[J].Journal of Documentation,196925(2):123-141.
42 Bourke P,Butler L.Publication types,citation rates and evaluation[J].Scientometrics,1996,37(3):473-494.
43 Zong Q J,Shen H Z,Yuan Q J,et al.Doctoral Dissertations of Library and Information Science in China:A Coword Analysis[J].Scientometrics,2013,94(2):781-799.
44鲁程.PQDD与ProQuest学位论文全文数据库的比较评析[J].图书馆论坛,2005,25(1):85-87.
45 Chen C,Luo B,Chiu K,et al.The preferences of authors of Chinese library and information science journal articles in citing Internet sources[J].Library&Information Science Research,2014,36(3-4):163-170.
46 Wang Q,Waltman L.Large-Scale Analysis of the Accuracy of the Journal Classification Systems of Web of Science and Scopus[J].Journal of Informetrics,2015,10(2):347-364.
47 Zipf G K.Human behavior and the principle of least effort[M].NJ:Addison-Wesley Press,1949.
48 Rhoten D R,Parker A.Risks and Rewards of an Interdisciplinary Research Path[J].Science,2004,306(5704):2046-2046.
49黄颖,高天舒,王志楠,等.基于Web of Science分类的跨学科测度研究[J].科研管理,2016,37(3):124-132.
50 Chang Y W,Huang M H.A study of the evolution of interdisciplinarity in library and information science:Using three bibliometric methods[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science&Technology,2012,63(1):22-33.
51 Lancho-Barrantes B S,Guerrero-Bote V P,Moya-Anegón F.What lies behind the averages and significance of citation indicators in different disciplines?[J].Journal of Information Science,2010,36(3):371-382.
52 Bornmann L,Schier H,Marx W,et al.What factors determine citation counts of publications in chemistry besides their quality?[J].Journal of Informetrics,2012,6(1):11-18.
53姜春林,刘学,张立伟.中文高被引期刊论文的参考文献也倾向于高被引吗?--以图书情报学为例[J].情报杂志,2015,34(1):105-109.
54 Line,M B.The half-life of periodical literature:Apparent and real obsolescence[J].Journal of Documentation,1970,26(1):46-54.
55 Line M B.Changes in the Use of Literature with TimeObsolescence Revisited[J].Library Trends,1993,41(4):665-683.
56 Price D J.Networks of Scientific Papers[J].Science,1965,149(3683):510-515.
57 Larivière V,Archambaulté,Gingras Y.Long‐term variations in the aging of scientific literature:From exponential growth to steady‐state science(1900-2004)[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science&Technology,2008,59(2):288-296.
58 Wu L,Huang M,Chen C,et al.Citation patterns of the pre-web and web-prevalent environments:The moderating effects of domain knowledge[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2012,63(11):2182-2194.
59 Boyce P B,King D W,Montgomery C H,et al.How Electronic Journals Are Changing Patterns of Use[J].Serials Librarian,2004,46(1):121-141.
2赵星,谭旻,余小萍,等.我国文科领域知识扩散之引文网络探析[J].中国图书馆学报,2012,38(5):59-67.
3 Li L.Analysis of factors restricting the development of science and technology journals in China[J].Publishing Research Quarterly,2004,19(4):45-53.
4 Xu L,Fang Q.Internationalization of Chinese STMJournal Publishing[J].Publishing Research Quarterly,2013,29(2):190-196.
5 Zou Y,Laubichler M D.Measuring the contributions of Chinese scholars to the research field of systems biology from 2005 to 2013[J].Scientometrics,2017,110(3):1-17.
6 Moed H F.Measuring China’s research performance using the Science Citation Index[J].Scientometrics,2002,53(3):281-296.
7 Wang S,Wang H,Weldon P R.Bibliometric analysis of English-language academic journals of China and their internationalization[J].Scientometrics,2007,73(3):331-343.
8 Ren S,Rousseau R.International visibility of Chinese scientific journals[J].Scientometrics,2002,53(3)389-405.
9 Li J,Qiao L,Li W,et al.Chinese-language articles are not biased in citations:Evidences from Chinese-English bilingual journals in Scopus and Web of Science[J].Journal of Informetrics,2014,8(4):912-916.
10梁永霞,刘则渊,杨中楷.引文分析学的知识流动理论探析[J].科学学研究,2010,28(5):668-674.
11 Lockett A,Mcwilliams A.The Balance of Trade Between Disciplines:Do We Effectively Manage Knowledge?[J].Journal of Management Inquiry,2005,14(2):139-150.
12 Wu C,Yan E,Hill C.Disciplinary knowledge diffusion in business research[J].Journal of Informetrics,2017,11(2)655-668.
13 Yan E,Ding Y,Cronin B,et al.A bird's-eye view of scientific trading:Dependency relations among fields of science[J].Journal of Informetrics,2013,7(2):249-264.
14 Yan E.Disciplinary knowledge production and diffusion in science[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science&Technology,2015,67(9):2223-2245.
15 Narin F,Hamilton K S,Olivastro D.The increasing linkage between U.S.technology and public science[J].Research Policy,1997,26(3):317-330.
16 Callaert J,Grouwels J,Looy B.Delineating the scientific footprint in technology:Identifying scientific publications within non-patent references[J].Scientometrics,2012,91(2):383-398.
17 Su X,Deng S,Shen S.The design and application value of the Chinese Social Science Citation Index[J].Scientometrics,2012,98(3):1567-1582.
18 Wang H,Deng S,Su X.A study on construction and analysis of discipline knowledge structure of Chinese LIS based on CSSCI[J].Scientometrics,2016,109(3):1-35.
19王军.中外十种外科学期刊文后参考文献著录差错对比分析[J].情报科学,2008,26(1):101-103.
20朱红梅,张大志,任红.对我国高影响力医学期刊的中、英文参考文献著录差错分析[J].中国科技期刊研究,2012,23(5):784-787.
21 Norris M,Oppenheim C.Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences’literature[J].Journal of Informetrics,2007,1(2):161-169.
22 López-Illescas C,Moya-Anegón F D,Moed H F.Coverage and citation impact of oncological journals in the Web of Science,and Scopus[J].Journal of Informetrics,2008,2(4):304-316.
23 Navarro G.A guided tour to approximate string matching[J].ACM Computing Surveys,2001,33(1):31-88.
24 Leydesdorff L,Rafols I.Indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals:Diversity,centrality,and citations[J].Journal of Informetrics,2011,5(1):87-100.
25 Wu C,Yan E,Hill C.Disciplinary knowledge diffusion in business research[J].Journal of Informetrics,2017,11(2):655-668.
26 Tahamtan I,Afshar A S,Ahamdzadeh K.Factors affecting number of citations:a comprehensive review of the literature[J].Scientometrics,2016,107(3):1195-1225.
27 Ma N,Guan J,Zhao Y,et al.Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis[J].Information Processing and Management,2008,44(2):800-810.
28谢娟,龚凯乐,成颖,等.论文下载量与被引相关关系的元分析[J].情报学报,2017,36(12):1255-1269.
29 Bornmann L.Alternative metrics in scientometrics:a metaanalysis of research into three altmetrics[J].Scientometrics,2015,103(3):1123-1144.
30 Abramo G,D’Angelo C A,Costa F D.Citations versus journal impact factor as proxy of quality:could the latter ever be preferable?[J].Scientometrics,2010,84(3):821-833.
31 Dorta-Gonz,Lez P,Dorta-Gonz,et al.Comparing journals from different fields of Science and Social Science through a JCR Subject Categories Normalized Impact Factor[J].Scientometrics,2013,95(2):645-672.
32 Yu L,Yu H.Does the average JIF percentile make a difference?[J].Scientometrics,2016,109(3):1979-1987.
33 Tsay M Y.An analysis and comparison of scientometric data between journals of physics,chemistry and engineering[J]Scientometrics,2009,78(2):279-293.
34 MacQueen J.Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observationsC]//Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability.1967,1(14):281-297.
35龚凯乐,成颖,孙建军.基于参与者共现分析的博文聚类研究[J].现代图书情报技术,2016,32(10):50-58.
36 Mccallum A.Efficient clustering of high-dimensional data sets with application to reference matching[C]//International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.DBLP,2000:169-178.
37 Raschka S.Python Machine Learning[M].UK:Packt Publishing,2014:320-321.
38 Han S,Shen C,Shen X,et al.A review of the major projects constituting the China Academic Digital Library[J].The Electronic Library,2008,26(1):39-54.
39 Meneghini R,Packer A L.Is there science beyond English?Initiatives to increase the quality and visibility of non-English publications might help to break down language barriers in scientific communication[J].Embo Reports,2007,8(8)112-116.
40 Gl?nzel W,Schoepflin U.A bibliometric study of reference literature in the sciences and social sciences[J].Information Processing&Management,1999,35(1):31-44.
41 Earle P,Vickery B.Social science literature use in the UKas indicated by citations[J].Journal of Documentation,196925(2):123-141.
42 Bourke P,Butler L.Publication types,citation rates and evaluation[J].Scientometrics,1996,37(3):473-494.
43 Zong Q J,Shen H Z,Yuan Q J,et al.Doctoral Dissertations of Library and Information Science in China:A Coword Analysis[J].Scientometrics,2013,94(2):781-799.
44鲁程.PQDD与ProQuest学位论文全文数据库的比较评析[J].图书馆论坛,2005,25(1):85-87.
45 Chen C,Luo B,Chiu K,et al.The preferences of authors of Chinese library and information science journal articles in citing Internet sources[J].Library&Information Science Research,2014,36(3-4):163-170.
46 Wang Q,Waltman L.Large-Scale Analysis of the Accuracy of the Journal Classification Systems of Web of Science and Scopus[J].Journal of Informetrics,2015,10(2):347-364.
47 Zipf G K.Human behavior and the principle of least effort[M].NJ:Addison-Wesley Press,1949.
48 Rhoten D R,Parker A.Risks and Rewards of an Interdisciplinary Research Path[J].Science,2004,306(5704):2046-2046.
49黄颖,高天舒,王志楠,等.基于Web of Science分类的跨学科测度研究[J].科研管理,2016,37(3):124-132.
50 Chang Y W,Huang M H.A study of the evolution of interdisciplinarity in library and information science:Using three bibliometric methods[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science&Technology,2012,63(1):22-33.
51 Lancho-Barrantes B S,Guerrero-Bote V P,Moya-Anegón F.What lies behind the averages and significance of citation indicators in different disciplines?[J].Journal of Information Science,2010,36(3):371-382.
52 Bornmann L,Schier H,Marx W,et al.What factors determine citation counts of publications in chemistry besides their quality?[J].Journal of Informetrics,2012,6(1):11-18.
53姜春林,刘学,张立伟.中文高被引期刊论文的参考文献也倾向于高被引吗?--以图书情报学为例[J].情报杂志,2015,34(1):105-109.
54 Line,M B.The half-life of periodical literature:Apparent and real obsolescence[J].Journal of Documentation,1970,26(1):46-54.
55 Line M B.Changes in the Use of Literature with TimeObsolescence Revisited[J].Library Trends,1993,41(4):665-683.
56 Price D J.Networks of Scientific Papers[J].Science,1965,149(3683):510-515.
57 Larivière V,Archambaulté,Gingras Y.Long‐term variations in the aging of scientific literature:From exponential growth to steady‐state science(1900-2004)[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science&Technology,2008,59(2):288-296.
58 Wu L,Huang M,Chen C,et al.Citation patterns of the pre-web and web-prevalent environments:The moderating effects of domain knowledge[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2012,63(11):2182-2194.
59 Boyce P B,King D W,Montgomery C H,et al.How Electronic Journals Are Changing Patterns of Use[J].Serials Librarian,2004,46(1):121-141.