科学合作与论文影响力之间的相关性研究
|
摘要
[目的/意义]随着科学研究综合性逐步加强,合作日渐成为主流的科研方式。通过对科学合作和论文影响力之间相关性进行研究,以探究科学合作是否对论文影响力存在着提升作用。[方法/过程]本文基于JCR的期刊数据,在Web of Science核心合集中选取了复合材料、图书情报和科学史与科学哲学领域2009-2012年的发文和被引数据,借助多元统计软件SPSS21.0和社会网络分析软件等从作者、机构、国家等3个层次研究科学合作和论文影响力之间的相关关系,进而以高被引论文为研究对象探寻最佳的合作规模。[结果/结论]在不同的学科中,作者合作、机构合作和国家合作均与论文影响力呈显著的正相关关系,但科学合作的边际效益不同。科学合作的规模不可能无限扩大,最佳的作者合作规模为2～4人,最佳的机构合作规模为1～3个,最佳的国家合作数目为1～2个。
[Purpose/Significance]As the comprehensive trend of scientific development is gradually strengthened,scientific cooperation has become an increasingly popular method.Through the study of the correlation between the scale of authors and the influence of the thesis,we can find whether the influence of paper is beneficial from cooperation.[Method/Process]Based on the data of journal of the JCR,the paper retrived from the Web of Science and get all the papers and citation in the field of materials science,composites,information science and library science and history & philosophy of science from 2009 to 2012.And it studied the correlation between collaboration and the influence of the paper with the help of multivariate statistical software SPSS21.0 and social network analysis software in the case of authors,affiliations and country.Furthermore,it explored the best scale of cooperation with highly cited papers.[Results/Conclusions]In the fields of materials science,composites,information science and library science and history & philosophy of science,author cooperation,institutional cooperation and international cooperation were all positively related to the influence of the paper,but the marginal benefit of scientific cooperation was different.The scale of scientific cooperation could not be expanded indefinitely.The best cooperation scale of the authors is 2～4,institutional cooperation is 1～3,and national cooperation is 1～2.
[Purpose/Significance]As the comprehensive trend of scientific development is gradually strengthened,scientific cooperation has become an increasingly popular method.Through the study of the correlation between the scale of authors and the influence of the thesis,we can find whether the influence of paper is beneficial from cooperation.[Method/Process]Based on the data of journal of the JCR,the paper retrived from the Web of Science and get all the papers and citation in the field of materials science,composites,information science and library science and history & philosophy of science from 2009 to 2012.And it studied the correlation between collaboration and the influence of the paper with the help of multivariate statistical software SPSS21.0 and social network analysis software in the case of authors,affiliations and country.Furthermore,it explored the best scale of cooperation with highly cited papers.[Results/Conclusions]In the fields of materials science,composites,information science and library science and history & philosophy of science,author cooperation,institutional cooperation and international cooperation were all positively related to the influence of the paper,but the marginal benefit of scientific cooperation was different.The scale of scientific cooperation could not be expanded indefinitely.The best cooperation scale of the authors is 2～4,institutional cooperation is 1～3,and national cooperation is 1～2.
引文
[1]文珺珺.关于“无形学院”[J].自然辩证法通讯,1987,(2):33-40.
[2]DJ Price.Little Science,Big Science-and Beyond[J].The Quarterly Review of Biology,1963,38(4):443-458.
[3]HA Zuckerman.Patterns of Name Ordering Among Authors of Scientific Papers:A Study of Social Symbolism and Its Ambiguity[J].American Journal of Sociology,1968,74(3):276-291.
[4]W Gl?nzel,H.J.Czerwon.A New Methodological Approach to Bibliographic Coupling and Its Application to the National,Regional and Institutional Level[J].Scientometrics,1996,37(2):195-221.
[5]Wang Xianwen,Xu Shenmeng,Wang Zhi et al.International Scientific Collaboration of China:Collaborating Countries,Institutions and Individuals[J].Scientometrics,2013,95(3):885-894.
[6]RK Merton.The Matthew Effect in Science:The Reward and Communication Systems of Science are Considered[J].Science,1968,159(3810):56-63.
[7]JF Miquel,Y Okubo.Structure of International Collaboration in Science-part Ⅱ:Comparisons of Profiles in Countries Using a Link Indicator[J].Scientometrics,1994,29(2):271-297.
[8]ME Newman.The Structure of Scientific Collaboration Networks[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2001,98(2):404.
[9]ME Newman.Scientific Collaboration Networks.Ⅰ.Network Construction and Fundamental Results[J].Physical Review E Statistical Nonlinear & Soft Matter Physics,2001,64(2):1-8.
[10]ME Newman.Scientific Collaboration Networks.Ⅱ.Shortest Paths,Weighted Networks,and Centrality[J].Physical Review E Statistical Nonlinear & Soft Matter Physics,2001,64(2):1-7.
[11]梁立明,朱凌,侯长红.我国跨省区科学合作中的马太效应与地域倾向[J].自然辩证法通讯,2002,24(2):42-50.
[12]姜春林,丁堃.关于我国高水平管理科学研究合作现象的统计分析——兼看年龄分布特征[J].研究与发展管理,2004,16(1):72-78.
[13]郭颍涛,杨思洛,邝飘.中外图书情报学科合作模式比较研究[J].情报理论与实践,2013,36(10):120-123.
[14]步一,王冰璐,徐扬,等.科学合作中合作者研究领域差异研究[J].情报杂志,2017,36(6):68-71.
[15]DJ Price,DD Beaver.Collaboration in an Invisible College[J].American Psychologist,1966,21(11):1011.
[16]P Hodder.Limits to Collaborative Authorship in Science Publishing[J].Journal of Research Communication Studies,1980(2):169.
[17]A Hollis.Co-authorship and the Output of Academic Economists[J].Labour Economics,2001,8(4):503-530.
[18]张冬玲.中国科学论文产出与合作状况的计量研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2009.
[19]刘则渊.科学合作最佳规模现象的发现[J].科学学研究,2012,30(4):481-486.
[20]刘俊婉.科学合作对高被引科学家论文产出力的影响分析[J].情报科学,2014,(12):77-81.
[21]Arthur E Nudelman,Clifford E.Landers.The Failure of 100 Divided by 3 to Equal 33-1/3[J].The American Sociologist,1972,7(9):9.
[22]SM Lawani.Some Bibliometric Correlates of Quality in Scientific Research[J].Scientometrics,1986,9(1-2):13-25.
[23]F Narin,ES Whitlow.Measurement of Scientific Cooperation and Coauthorship in CEC-related areas of Science.Commission of the European Communities[M].Luxembourg:Office for Official Publications of the European Communities,1990.
[24]W Gl?nzel,A Schubert.Double Effort=Double Impact?A Critical View at International Co-authorship in Chemistry[J].Scientometrics,2001,50(2):199-214.
[25]M Franceschet,A Costantini.The Effect of Scholar Collaboration on Impact and Quality of Academic Papers[J].Journal of Informetrics,2010,4(4):540-553.
[26]钟镇.学术论文合著规模与引文影响力的相关性分析——以图书情报学为例[J].情报杂志,2013,(12):127-131.
[27]林卉.机构合作网络与论文合作影响力研究[D].南京:南京农业大学,2014.
[28]孟凡生.科研成本控制问题研究[J].科技管理研究,2006,26(4):66-67.
[29]北京日报.人文学科研究不宜搞“学术合作社”[EB/OL].http://news.163.com/13/0422/04/8T1OP25M00014AED.html,2018-05-08.
[30]邱均平.信息计量学(六):第六讲文献信息作者分布规律——洛特卡定律[J].情报理论与实践,2000,(6):475-478.
[31]刘雪立.基于Web of Science和ESI数据库高被引论文的界定方法[J].中国科技期刊研究,2012,23(6):975-978.
[32]张文强.我国产业技术创新与产学研结合模式研究[D].武汉:武汉理工大学,2013.
[33]360百科.散点图[EB/OL].https://baike.so.com/doc/5332296-5567662.html,2018-08-11.
[34]林墨.流水不腐,阻碍科学家自由流动是不对的[EB/OL].http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-1792012-1087740.html,2018-08-13.
[35]谢彩霞.科学合作方式及其功能的科学计量学研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2006.
[2]DJ Price.Little Science,Big Science-and Beyond[J].The Quarterly Review of Biology,1963,38(4):443-458.
[3]HA Zuckerman.Patterns of Name Ordering Among Authors of Scientific Papers:A Study of Social Symbolism and Its Ambiguity[J].American Journal of Sociology,1968,74(3):276-291.
[4]W Gl?nzel,H.J.Czerwon.A New Methodological Approach to Bibliographic Coupling and Its Application to the National,Regional and Institutional Level[J].Scientometrics,1996,37(2):195-221.
[5]Wang Xianwen,Xu Shenmeng,Wang Zhi et al.International Scientific Collaboration of China:Collaborating Countries,Institutions and Individuals[J].Scientometrics,2013,95(3):885-894.
[6]RK Merton.The Matthew Effect in Science:The Reward and Communication Systems of Science are Considered[J].Science,1968,159(3810):56-63.
[7]JF Miquel,Y Okubo.Structure of International Collaboration in Science-part Ⅱ:Comparisons of Profiles in Countries Using a Link Indicator[J].Scientometrics,1994,29(2):271-297.
[8]ME Newman.The Structure of Scientific Collaboration Networks[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2001,98(2):404.
[9]ME Newman.Scientific Collaboration Networks.Ⅰ.Network Construction and Fundamental Results[J].Physical Review E Statistical Nonlinear & Soft Matter Physics,2001,64(2):1-8.
[10]ME Newman.Scientific Collaboration Networks.Ⅱ.Shortest Paths,Weighted Networks,and Centrality[J].Physical Review E Statistical Nonlinear & Soft Matter Physics,2001,64(2):1-7.
[11]梁立明,朱凌,侯长红.我国跨省区科学合作中的马太效应与地域倾向[J].自然辩证法通讯,2002,24(2):42-50.
[12]姜春林,丁堃.关于我国高水平管理科学研究合作现象的统计分析——兼看年龄分布特征[J].研究与发展管理,2004,16(1):72-78.
[13]郭颍涛,杨思洛,邝飘.中外图书情报学科合作模式比较研究[J].情报理论与实践,2013,36(10):120-123.
[14]步一,王冰璐,徐扬,等.科学合作中合作者研究领域差异研究[J].情报杂志,2017,36(6):68-71.
[15]DJ Price,DD Beaver.Collaboration in an Invisible College[J].American Psychologist,1966,21(11):1011.
[16]P Hodder.Limits to Collaborative Authorship in Science Publishing[J].Journal of Research Communication Studies,1980(2):169.
[17]A Hollis.Co-authorship and the Output of Academic Economists[J].Labour Economics,2001,8(4):503-530.
[18]张冬玲.中国科学论文产出与合作状况的计量研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2009.
[19]刘则渊.科学合作最佳规模现象的发现[J].科学学研究,2012,30(4):481-486.
[20]刘俊婉.科学合作对高被引科学家论文产出力的影响分析[J].情报科学,2014,(12):77-81.
[21]Arthur E Nudelman,Clifford E.Landers.The Failure of 100 Divided by 3 to Equal 33-1/3[J].The American Sociologist,1972,7(9):9.
[22]SM Lawani.Some Bibliometric Correlates of Quality in Scientific Research[J].Scientometrics,1986,9(1-2):13-25.
[23]F Narin,ES Whitlow.Measurement of Scientific Cooperation and Coauthorship in CEC-related areas of Science.Commission of the European Communities[M].Luxembourg:Office for Official Publications of the European Communities,1990.
[24]W Gl?nzel,A Schubert.Double Effort=Double Impact?A Critical View at International Co-authorship in Chemistry[J].Scientometrics,2001,50(2):199-214.
[25]M Franceschet,A Costantini.The Effect of Scholar Collaboration on Impact and Quality of Academic Papers[J].Journal of Informetrics,2010,4(4):540-553.
[26]钟镇.学术论文合著规模与引文影响力的相关性分析——以图书情报学为例[J].情报杂志,2013,(12):127-131.
[27]林卉.机构合作网络与论文合作影响力研究[D].南京:南京农业大学,2014.
[28]孟凡生.科研成本控制问题研究[J].科技管理研究,2006,26(4):66-67.
[29]北京日报.人文学科研究不宜搞“学术合作社”[EB/OL].http://news.163.com/13/0422/04/8T1OP25M00014AED.html,2018-05-08.
[30]邱均平.信息计量学(六):第六讲文献信息作者分布规律——洛特卡定律[J].情报理论与实践,2000,(6):475-478.
[31]刘雪立.基于Web of Science和ESI数据库高被引论文的界定方法[J].中国科技期刊研究,2012,23(6):975-978.
[32]张文强.我国产业技术创新与产学研结合模式研究[D].武汉:武汉理工大学,2013.
[33]360百科.散点图[EB/OL].https://baike.so.com/doc/5332296-5567662.html,2018-08-11.
[34]林墨.流水不腐,阻碍科学家自由流动是不对的[EB/OL].http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-1792012-1087740.html,2018-08-13.
[35]谢彩霞.科学合作方式及其功能的科学计量学研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2006.