摘要
基于AVC理论,据景区村庄相关界定及相关领域研究,提出景区村庄"三力"重要评价影响因素,吸引力:村庄特色资源、旅游环境设施要素、区位条件;生命力:社会经济、居民生活、产业结构、综合管理运营能力;承载力:生态环境承载力、旅游资源空间承载力、经济承载力、心理承载力,并构建AVC景区村庄景观综合评价研究体系,为景区村庄今后的建设发展提供了建设指导依据。并将此体系运用于实际案例中,对案例"三力"发展现状进行评价分析,以三力提升为目标进行一系列规划设计。
Based on AVC theory and based on the relevant definition of villages in the scenic area and related field research, this paper puts forward the important influencing factors of "three forces" of villages in the scenic area. Attraction: characteristic resources of the village, elements of tourism environment facilities, location conditions; Vitality: social economy, residents' life, industrial structure, comprehensive management and operation ability; Capacity: ecological environmental bearing capacity, space tourism resources bearing capacity, economy carrying capacity, the psychological bearing capacity, and build the AVC scenic village comprehensive evaluation system of research, for the scenic village construction guidance basis was provided for the construction and development in the future, and Finally, the system is applied to practical cases, and provides guidance and measures for the development of Panyang village.
引文
[1]浙江省A级景区村庄服务与管理指南[S].2017.
[2]郑文俊.基于旅游视角的乡村景观吸引力研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2009.
[3]孙吉亚.京郊旅游导向型乡村景观建设研究———以密云县石城镇捧河沿村为例[D].北京:北京林业大学,2013.
[4]刘滨谊.景区与旅游区AVC评价量化模型———以玄武湖景观区总体规划为例[J].中国园林,2003,(06):63-64,69-70.
[5]肖洪根.旅游区吸引度指数与闽南三角旅游资源评价[J].旅游科学,1996,(02):28-30.
[6]保继刚.引力模型在游客预测中的应用[J].中山大学学报,1992,31(4):22-25.
[7]陈岩英.旅游地的吸引力系统及其管理研究[J].旅游科学,2004,18(3):16-21.
[8]王秋鸟.基于AVC的乡村景观综合评价研究———以三叉村为例[J].西北林学院学报,2016,31(3):298~303.
[9]蔡光宇.景观与旅游的生命力研究[D].上海:同济大学,2004.
[10]梁雪嘉.风景旅游规划生命力研究与运用[D].上海:同济大学,2007.
[11]谢志晶.基于AVC理论的乡村景观综合评价[J].江苏农业科学,2011,39(2):266-269.
[12]匡丽红.风景旅游地承载力组织研究[D].上海:同济大学,2006.