关节液中细菌16srRNA与23s rRNA诊断膝关节置换术后感染的价值
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Value of bacterial 16s rRNA and 23s rRNA in the diagnosis of infection after total knee arthroplasty
  • 作者:郑忠 ; 蔡碰德 ; 顾恩毅 ; 李超雄 ; 林向全 ; 陈国龄
  • 英文作者:ZHENG Zhong;CAI Pengde;GU Enyi;LI Chaoxiong;LIN Xiangquan;CHEN Guoling;Department of Orthopedics,Fuzhou Municipal Second Hospital;
  • 关键词:16s ; rRNA ; 23s ; rRNA ; 关节置换 ; 感染 ; 基因诊断
  • 英文关键词:16s rRNA;;23s rRNA;;joint arthroplasty;;infection;;gene diagnosis
  • 中文刊名:FJYY
  • 英文刊名:Fujian Medical Journal
  • 机构:福州市第二医院骨科;
  • 出版日期:2017-04-15
  • 出版单位:福建医药杂志
  • 年:2017
  • 期:v.39
  • 基金:福州市卫生科技计划青年科研项目(2013-S-W7)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:FJYY201702020
  • 页数:4
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:35-1071/R
  • 分类号:59-62
摘要
目的探讨利用关节液中细菌16s rRNA与23s rRNA诊断全膝关节置换术后感染的效率及两种基因诊断方法的差异。方法对33例无菌性松动及19例假体周围感染行人工膝关节翻修的患者,通过RT-PCR检测关节液中细菌16s rRNA、23s rRNA保守基因片段诊断假体周围感染。比较两种诊断策略的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确性。结果以国外关于假体周围感染诊断方法的文献判定假体周围感染,利用16s rRNA进行诊断的敏感性78.8%,特异性93.9%,阳性预测值88.2%,阴性预测值为88.6%,准确性为88.5%;而采用23s rRNA扩增方法诊断的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确性分别为68.4%、78.8%、65.0%、81.2%和75.0%。两种基因诊断的各指标比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论通过检测关节液中细菌16s rRNA或23s rRNA诊断人工膝关节置换术后感染,具有较高的诊断效率,且两者差异无统计学意义。
        Objective To explore the power of detecting bacteria 16 s rRNA and 23 srRNA to diagnose periprosthetic joint infection(PJI)after total knee arthroplasty(TKA).Methods A prospective study of 52 patients who had a TKA and were undergoing a reoperation because of infection(19patients)or aseptic loosening(33patients)was conducted.The 16 S rRNA and 23 S rRNA in joint fluid were detected by RT-PCR as a marker to diagnose PJI.The sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value,negative predictive value,and accuracy were compared.Results The diagnose power of 16 srRNA was higher than 23s rRNA:sensitivity(78.8% vs 68.4%),specificity(93.9% vs 78.8%),positive predictive value(88.2% vs65.0%),negative predictive value(88.6% vs 81.2%)and accuracy(88.5% vs 75.0%).However,all of those difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).Conclusion Both 16 srRNA and 23 srRNA have satisfactory diagnosis power of to detect PJI,and there was no difference.
引文
[1]Peersman G,Laskin R,Davis J,et al.Infection in total knee replacement:a retrospective review of 6489total knee replacements[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,2001,(392):15-23.
    [2]Mortazavi S M,Molligan J,Austin M S,et al.Failure following revision total knee arthroplasty:infection is the major cause[J].Int Orthop,2011,35(8):1157-1164.
    [3]Bereza P,Ekiel A,Auguciak-Duma A,et al.Comparison of cultures and 16SrRNA sequencing for identification of bacteria in two-stage revision arthroplasties:preliminary report[J].BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2016,25(17):138-142.
    [4]Achermann Y,Vogt M,Leunig M,et al.Improved diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection by multiplex PCR of sonication fluid from removed implants[J].J Clin Microbiol,2010,48(4):1208-1214.
    [5]Bauer T W,Parvizi J,Kobayashi N,et al.Diagnosis of periprosthetic infection[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2006,88(4):869-882.
    [6]Parvizi J,Adeli B,Zmistowski B,et al.Management of periprosthetic joint infection:the current knowledge:AAOS exhibit selection[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2012,94(14):e104-e110.
    [7]Di Cesare P E,Chang E,Preston C F,et al.Serum interleukin-6as a marker of periprosthetic infection following total hip and knee arthroplasty[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2005,87(9):1921-1927.
    [8]Honsawek S,Deepaisarnsakul B,Tanavalee A,et al.Relationship of serum IL-6,C-reactive protein,erythrocyte sedimentation rate,and knee skin temperature after total knee arthroplasty:aprospective study[J].Int Orthop,2011,35(1):31-35.
    [9]Stroh D A,Johnson A J,Naziri Q,et al.How do frozen and permanent histopathologic diagnoses compare for staged revision after periprosthetic hip infections?[J].J Arthroplasty,2012,27(9):1663-1668.
    [10]Banit D M,Kaufer H,Hartford J M.Intraoperative frozen section analysis in revision total joint arthroplasty[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,2002,(401):230-238.
    [11]Nickinson R S,Board T N,Gambhir A K,et al.The microbiology of the infected knee arthroplasty[J].Int Orthop,2010,34(4):505-510.
    [12]Stefánsdóttir A,Johansson D,Knutson K,et al.Microbiology of the infected knee arthroplasty:report from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register on 426surgically revised cases[J].Scand J Infect Dis,2009,41(11-12):831-840.
    [13]Birmingham P,Helm J M,Manner P A,et al.Simulated joint infection assessment by rapid detection of live bacteria with real-time reverse transcription[J].Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery,2008,90(3):602-608.
    [14]Sheridan G E,Masters C I,Shallcross J A,et al.Detection of mRNA by reverse transcription-PCR as an indicator of viability in Escherichia coli cells[J].Appl Environ Microbiol,1998,64(4):1313-1318.
    [15]Aellen S,Que Y A,Guignard B,et al.Detection of live and antibiotic-killed bacteria by quantitative real-time PCR of specific fragments of rRNA[J].Antimicrob Agents Chemother,2006,50(6):1913-1920.
    [16]Chakravorty S,Helb D,Burday M,et al.A detailed analysis of 16Sribosomal RNA gene segments for the diagnosis of pathogenic bacteria[J].Microbiol Methods,2007,69(2):330-339.
    [17]Kobayashi N,Inaba Y,Choe H,et al.Rapid and sensitive detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus periprosthetic infections using real-time polymerase chain reaction[J].Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis,2009,64(2):172-176.
    [18]Trampuz A,Piper K E,Jacobson M J,et al.Sonication of removed hip and knee prostheses for diagnosis of infection[J].N Engl J Med,2007,357(7):654-663.
    [19]Rak M,KavˇcIˇc M,Treb2e R,et al.Detection of bacteria with molecular methods in prosthetic joint infection:sonication fluid better than periprosthetic tissue[J].Acta Orthop,2016,87(4):339-345.
    [20]Lonner J H,Siliski J M,Della Valle C,et al.Role of knee aspiration after resection of the infected total knee arthroplasty[J].Orthop,2001,30(4):305-309.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700