走向“超越权力”的“自我解放”——反思霍洛威对马克思主义革命理念的重构
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Towards the Self-liberation Beyond Power:Reflection on Holloway's Reconstruction about Marx's Theory of Revolution
  • 作者:孙亮
  • 英文作者:SUN Liang;East China Normal University;
  • 关键词:霍洛威 ; 马克思 ; 权力 ; 裂缝式革命
  • 英文关键词:Holloway;;Marx;;power;;Interstitial Revolution
  • 中文刊名:WHDS
  • 英文刊名:Wuhan University Journal(Arts & Humanity)
  • 机构:华东师范大学哲学系;
  • 出版日期:2017-01-06
  • 出版单位:武汉大学学报(人文科学版)
  • 年:2017
  • 期:v.70;No.348
  • 基金:上海市哲学社会科学基金一般项目(2016BZX005)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:WHDS201701009
  • 页数:9
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:42-1662/C
  • 分类号:47-55
摘要
基于将"抵抗资本逻辑"细化为"行为抵抗抽象劳动"与"抽象劳动抵抗资本"两个层面,霍洛威批判了传统马克思主义过于重视后一种路径及其所倡导的劳工运动,但这一方向的实践导致了诸多的现实困境。在他看来,应该从"抽象劳动抵抗资本"转向围绕"行为"本身去寻求一种有尊严的裂缝式革命。但实质上,霍洛威所构想的革命理念要求废除资本的支配地位却又不触及对国家权力的反抗,本身是一个悖论,这不可能迎来自我确定(自决)的社会或共产主义社会。它表面上的激进,实质上遣散了左派的力量,走向一种新无政府主义。
        Based on the division of"resistance against the capital logics"into two forms:doing against abstract labor and abstract labor against capital,Holloway criticizes the latter approach that overestimated by traditional Marxism which has led to so many difficulties of reality.From the perspectives of Holloway,it is needed to search for a dignified Interstitial Revolution in the form of doing itself coming from the abstract labor against capital.Essentially,what Holloway's theory of revolution requires is to abandon the domination of capital,but it finally does not touch on the rebellion against the state power,which seems to be a dilemma and it is difficult to bring a self-determined or communist society.Itappears to be radical and demobilizes the power of the Left in fact.This leads to be a neo-anarchism.
引文
(1)前者被翻译为11种语言,后者则被翻译为10种语言,影响广泛。以亚洲的日文版为例,就在日语学术界引发了诸多讨论。霍洛威授权笔者译介其文章,其论著将进一步以中文呈现。
    (1)HOLLOWAY J.Cracks and the Crisis of Abstract Labour.Antipode,2010,42(4):917.
    (2)BONEFELD W,GUNN R,PSYCHOPEDIS K.Open Marxism Vol.II:Theory and Practice.London:Pluto Press,1992:146.
    (3)BONEFELD W,GUNN R,PSYCHOPEDIS K.Open Marxism Vol.II:Theory and Practice.London:Pluto Press,1992:59.
    (4)BONEFELD W,GUNN R,PSYCHOPEDIS K.Open Marxism Vol.II:Theory and Practice.London:Pluto Press,1992:160-161.
    (5)HOLLOWAY J.Cracks and the Crisis of Abstract Labour.Antipode,2010,42(4):916.
    (6)马克思.资本论(1863-1865年手稿)摘选//马克思.恩格斯.马克思恩格斯文集:第8卷.北京:人民出版社,2009:469.
    (7)HOLLOWAY J.Change the World without Taking Power.London:Plutopress,2010:30.
    (8)HOLLOWAY J.Change the World without Taking Power.London:Plutopress,2010:43.
    (1)马克思.1844年经济学哲学手稿//马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯文集:第1卷.北京:人民出版社,2009:186.
    (2)HOLLOWAY J.Cracks and the Crisis of Abstract Labour.Antipode,2010,42(4):917.
    (3)HOLLOWAY J.Cracks and the Crisis of Abstract Labour.Antipode,2010,42(4):918.
    (4)HOLLOWAY J.In,Against,and Beyond Capitalism.Oakland:PM Press.2016:50-53.
    (1)HOLLOWAY J.Change the World without Taking Power.London:Plutopress,2010:242.
    (2)HOLLOWAY J.Change the World without Taking Power.London:Plutopress,2010:242.
    (3)HOLLOWAY J.Change the World without Taking Power.London:Plutopress,2010:8.
    (4)HOLLOWAY J.Change the World without Taking Power.London:Plutopress,2010:1.
    (5)HOLLOWAY J.Change the World without Taking Power.London:Plutopress,2010:22-23.
    (6)HOLLOWAY J.In,Against,and Beyond Capitalism.Oakland:PM Press,2016:77.
    (1)HOLLOWAY J.Change the World without Taking Power.London:Plutopress,2010:10.
    (2)HOLLOWAY J.Change the World without Taking Power.London:Plutopress,2010:19.
    (3)HOLLOWAY J.Change the World without Taking Power.London:Plutopress,2010:19.
    (4)HOLLOWAY J.Change the World without Taking Power.London:Plutopress,2010:20.
    (5)HOLLOWAY J.Change the World without Taking Power.London:Plutopress,2010:29.
    (1)HOLLOWAY J.Change the World without Taking Power.London:Plutopress,2010:29-30.
    (2)HOLLOWAY J.Change the World without Taking Power.London:Plutopress,2010:32.
    (3)HOLLOWAY J.Change the World without Taking Power.London:Plutopress,2010:36.
    (4)HOLLOWAY J.Change the World without Taking Power.London:Plutopress,2010:37.
    (5)HOLLOWAY J.Change the World without Taking Power.London:Plutopress,2010:159.
    (1)马克思.政治经济学批判(1861-1863年手稿)摘选//马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯文集:第8卷.北京:人民出版社,2009:387.
    (2)马克思.资本论:第1卷//马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯文集:第5卷.北京:人民出版社,2009:683.
    (3)Marcel Stoetzler.On the Possibility that the Revolution that will End Capitalism Might Fail to Usher in Communism.Journal of Classical Sociology,2012.12(2):192.
    (4)Marcel Stoetzler.On the Possibility that the Revolution that will End Capitalism Might Fail to Usher in Communism.Journal of Classical Sociology,2012.12(2):191.
    (5)HOLLOWAY J.Variations on Different Themes:A Response.Journal of Classical Sociology,2012.12.(2):336.
    (6)HOLLOWAY J.Variations on Different Themes:A Response.Journal of Classical Sociology,2012.12.(2):341.
    (1)HOLLOWAY J.Variations on Different Themes:A Response.Journal of Classical Sociology,2012.12.(2):342.
    (2)LYNCH R A.Foucault’s Theory of Power//Dianna Taylor.Michel Foucault:Key Concepts,Routledge,2014:13.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700