《资本论》创作史上的“历史路标”论析——关于《1861—1863年经济学手稿》的若干理论问题解析
|
摘要
《1861—1863年经济学手稿》是《资本论》创作史上的重大文献,研究它可以帮助人们全面、深入、完整、准确地理解马克思的经济思想和哲学思想。迄今为止,中外学者对其的研究取得了一定的成果,但仍有不少人不了解这部手稿的来龙去脉、刊布情况和其所包含的主要理论问题,手稿中最具有特色的双重话语问题也未能引起学者们的足够重视,但这却是该手稿最值得研究之处。这些问题的分析、探究和解决,需要使用马克思主义文献学的研究方法,借助最新的MEGA2资料来将历史与理论两方面的研究结合起来,并在此基础上,探发和彰显马克思文献的当代学术价值和现实意义。
Economics Manuscripts of 1861—1863 is one of the most significant works in the writing history of Das Kapital and the research on it helps us to understand Marx's theories comprehensively,thoroughly,completely and accurately. So far till now,many scholars try their best to rethink and restudy this manuscript and got some results,but there are still lots of people do not understand the ins and outs of Economics Manuscripts of 1861—1863. Economics Manuscripts of 1861—1863 contains a double discourse issue which is the most worthy of the research of this manuscript but fails to arouse enough attention of people. The analysis,exploration and addressing of these issues need to study boththe writing history,theories and manuscripts of Das Kapital with the research methods of Marxism philology and the latest MEGA2 data. Only in this way and on this basis can we explore and highlight the contemporary Marxist literature's academic value and practical significance.
Economics Manuscripts of 1861—1863 is one of the most significant works in the writing history of Das Kapital and the research on it helps us to understand Marx's theories comprehensively,thoroughly,completely and accurately. So far till now,many scholars try their best to rethink and restudy this manuscript and got some results,but there are still lots of people do not understand the ins and outs of Economics Manuscripts of 1861—1863. Economics Manuscripts of 1861—1863 contains a double discourse issue which is the most worthy of the research of this manuscript but fails to arouse enough attention of people. The analysis,exploration and addressing of these issues need to study boththe writing history,theories and manuscripts of Das Kapital with the research methods of Marxism philology and the latest MEGA2 data. Only in this way and on this basis can we explore and highlight the contemporary Marxist literature's academic value and practical significance.
引文
[1]马克思恩格斯选集:第2卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.
[2]卢晓萍.马克思的1861—1863年经济学手稿在《马克思恩格斯全集》中文第二版中的编排情况[J].当代经济研究,1997(2).
[3]马克思恩格斯全集:第32卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1998.
[4]马克思恩格斯全集:第33卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2004.
[5]顾海良.马克思经济思想的“历史路标”——读马克思《1861—1863年经济学手稿》[J].中国高校社会科学,2013(2).
[6]诺曼·莱文.黑格尔与《资本论》1861—1863年手稿[J].赵辛,译.马克思主义与现实,2012(2).
[7]理查德·贝洛菲尔.重读马克思——历史考证版之后的新视野[M].徐素华,译.北京:东方出版社,2010.
[8]郭继严.《政治经济学批判(1861—1863年手稿)》在《资本论》创作史上的历史地位[J].马克思主义研究,1985(1).
[2]卢晓萍.马克思的1861—1863年经济学手稿在《马克思恩格斯全集》中文第二版中的编排情况[J].当代经济研究,1997(2).
[3]马克思恩格斯全集:第32卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1998.
[4]马克思恩格斯全集:第33卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2004.
[5]顾海良.马克思经济思想的“历史路标”——读马克思《1861—1863年经济学手稿》[J].中国高校社会科学,2013(2).
[6]诺曼·莱文.黑格尔与《资本论》1861—1863年手稿[J].赵辛,译.马克思主义与现实,2012(2).
[7]理查德·贝洛菲尔.重读马克思——历史考证版之后的新视野[M].徐素华,译.北京:东方出版社,2010.
[8]郭继严.《政治经济学批判(1861—1863年手稿)》在《资本论》创作史上的历史地位[J].马克思主义研究,1985(1).