应用运动处方教学对高职学生体质影响的实验研究
|
摘要
以体质健康测试数据为依据、以运动处方教学和常规体育课教学两种模式为基本的研究手段而进行的对比实验,有助于探讨和研究在高职院校实施运动处方教学模式的可行性。研究结果显示:在两种教学模式下学习的学生在身体素质、心肺功能等指标上存在显著性差异。运动处方教学模式能有效地提高学生的运动能力和体质健康水平,增强学生的心肺功能,并能显著改善他们的体质。这是一种科学的、值得推广的新型教学模式,具有较强的可行性和实效性。
The contrast experiment, which has adopted exercise prescription teaching and regular physical education teaching as two basic study means based on the testing data of physical health, helps to discuss and study the feasibility of implementing the exercise prescription teaching mode in higher vocational institutes. The results showed that there were significant differences in physical fitness, cardiopulmonary function and other indicators between two groups of students under two different teaching modes. The implementation of exercise prescription teaching model can effectively improve students' exercise ability and physical health,enhance their cardiopulmonary function, and significantly improve their physique. It is a new scientific teaching model worthy of promotion with strong feasibility and effectiveness.
The contrast experiment, which has adopted exercise prescription teaching and regular physical education teaching as two basic study means based on the testing data of physical health, helps to discuss and study the feasibility of implementing the exercise prescription teaching mode in higher vocational institutes. The results showed that there were significant differences in physical fitness, cardiopulmonary function and other indicators between two groups of students under two different teaching modes. The implementation of exercise prescription teaching model can effectively improve students' exercise ability and physical health,enhance their cardiopulmonary function, and significantly improve their physique. It is a new scientific teaching model worthy of promotion with strong feasibility and effectiveness.
引文
[1]国家体育总局.学生体质测定标准手册[M].北京:人民体育出版社, 2003.
[2]毕春佑.健身教育教程[M].北京:科学出版社,1997:133-137.
[3]沈勋章.全民健身处方大全[M].上海:上海科学技术文献出版社, 2002:117-336.
[4]杨文轩.大学生健身运动处方的实用研究[J].体育学刊, 2002(4):2-5.
[5]雷芬芳.不同健身运动处方对大学生体质健康水平的影响[J].中国运动医学杂志, 2005,24(3):317-321.
[6]教育部. 2002年学生体质健康监测报告[R].教育部, 2003.
[7]刘纪清.实用运动处方[M].哈尔滨:黑龙江科学技术出版社, 1993.
[8]张秋云.大学体育课对学生实施耐力处方效果的分析[J].吉林体育学院学报, 2005,21(1):130.
[9]王志华,熊云新,等.健身运动处方教学模式与传统体育教学模式的比较研究[J].北京体育大学学报,2007.
[10]王勤.健身模式教学对大学生体育学习兴趣、价值观及动机的影响[J].首都体育学院学报, 2002(9).
[2]毕春佑.健身教育教程[M].北京:科学出版社,1997:133-137.
[3]沈勋章.全民健身处方大全[M].上海:上海科学技术文献出版社, 2002:117-336.
[4]杨文轩.大学生健身运动处方的实用研究[J].体育学刊, 2002(4):2-5.
[5]雷芬芳.不同健身运动处方对大学生体质健康水平的影响[J].中国运动医学杂志, 2005,24(3):317-321.
[6]教育部. 2002年学生体质健康监测报告[R].教育部, 2003.
[7]刘纪清.实用运动处方[M].哈尔滨:黑龙江科学技术出版社, 1993.
[8]张秋云.大学体育课对学生实施耐力处方效果的分析[J].吉林体育学院学报, 2005,21(1):130.
[9]王志华,熊云新,等.健身运动处方教学模式与传统体育教学模式的比较研究[J].北京体育大学学报,2007.
[10]王勤.健身模式教学对大学生体育学习兴趣、价值观及动机的影响[J].首都体育学院学报, 2002(9).