Bland-Altman一致性评价推荐的报告条目
|
摘要
Bland-Altman一致性评价方法在医药卫生领域已得到普遍应用,然而其研究报告质量却令人堪忧。文中旨在开发一套Bland-Altman一致性评价的报告规范,以指导Bland-Altman方法的正确应用,提升研究报告的质量。Bland-Altman方法一致性评价研究报告规范课题组通过文献充分复习、定期会议讨论、咨询同行专家、系统评价文献、条目整合提炼,并邀请多学科专家开展"头脑风暴"完善整体设计、评议报告条目、形成报告条目初稿。借助Delphi法进行多轮专家咨询,集成专家意见建议,形成报告条目讨论稿。课题组研究论证,拟定出Bland-Altman方法一致性评价的报告条目(RiBAM)推荐稿。BlandAltman一致性评价报告构建了由17个一级条目、23个二级条目组成的推荐条目清单,即RiBAM,涵盖的内容较为全面、系统,对避免报告内容的遗漏、实现报告的清晰性、完整性和透明性,进而提升研究的报告质量具有重要参考价值。提出的RiBAM推荐条目既可用于Bland-Altman一致性评价报告的作者写作指导,也可作为该类稿件的期刊编辑、同行审稿以及该类文献的读者阅读时的基本参考。
With the promotion and application in medicine and sanitary fields,the reporting quality of Bland-Altman agreement evaluation is worrying. This study aimed at developing a set of reporting standards for Bland-Altman agreement evaluation as the guidance for proper application to improve the reporting quality. A research group was launched to work on reporting standards for Bland-Altman agreement evaluation,and all the requirements for personnel on various levels were made clear. Early in the study,we carried out articles reviews,regular meetings,expert consultations,literary evaluation,item integration and extraction. Then,we invited a multi-disciplinary panel of experts to improve overall design,evaluate reporting items and form the first draft by brainstorming method. Multiple rounds of expert consultations were also conducted with reference to Delphi method to integrate expert advice and form the basic framework of reporting items. Finally,through the thorough analysis and demonstration,we proposed the reporting items for the agreement evaluation of Bland-Altman method( RiBAM) as the recommended report. A list of recommended items called RiBAM was formed,which consisted of 17 first-level items and 23 secondary-level items. RiBAM is more comprehensive and systematic as an important reference for improving the quality of reports by avoiding the omission of reporting contents and achieving the clarity,integrity and transparency of the report. RiBAM recommended items can be a guide for authors in reporting Bland-Altman agreement evaluation as well as a basic reference for journal editors,peer reviewers and readers.
With the promotion and application in medicine and sanitary fields,the reporting quality of Bland-Altman agreement evaluation is worrying. This study aimed at developing a set of reporting standards for Bland-Altman agreement evaluation as the guidance for proper application to improve the reporting quality. A research group was launched to work on reporting standards for Bland-Altman agreement evaluation,and all the requirements for personnel on various levels were made clear. Early in the study,we carried out articles reviews,regular meetings,expert consultations,literary evaluation,item integration and extraction. Then,we invited a multi-disciplinary panel of experts to improve overall design,evaluate reporting items and form the first draft by brainstorming method. Multiple rounds of expert consultations were also conducted with reference to Delphi method to integrate expert advice and form the basic framework of reporting items. Finally,through the thorough analysis and demonstration,we proposed the reporting items for the agreement evaluation of Bland-Altman method( RiBAM) as the recommended report. A list of recommended items called RiBAM was formed,which consisted of 17 first-level items and 23 secondary-level items. RiBAM is more comprehensive and systematic as an important reference for improving the quality of reports by avoiding the omission of reporting contents and achieving the clarity,integrity and transparency of the report. RiBAM recommended items can be a guide for authors in reporting Bland-Altman agreement evaluation as well as a basic reference for journal editors,peer reviewers and readers.
引文
[1]Altman DG,Bland JM.Measurement in medicine:the analysis of method comparison studies[J].Statistician,1983,32(3):307-317.
[2]Bland JM,Altman DG.Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement[J].Lancet,1986,1(8476):307-310.
[3]Hamilton C,Stamey J.Using Bland-Altman to Assess Agreement between Two Medical Devices-Don’t Forget the Confidence Intervals![J]J Clin Monit Comput,2007,21(6):331-333.
[4]刘甜甜,钟伟华,陆梦洁,等.2014~2016年中国Bland-Altman方法一致性评价的报告质量研究[J].中国循证医学杂志,2018,18(1):67-73.
[5]Mantha S,Roizen MF,Fleisher LA,et al.Comparing methods of clinical measurement:reporting standards for bland and altman analysis[J].Anesth Analg,2000,90(3):593.
[6]Dewitte K,Fierens C,St9ckl D,et al.Application of the Bland-Altman plot for interpretation of method-comparison studies:a critical investigation of its practice[J].Clin Chem,2002,48(5):801-802.
[7]Berthelsen PG,Nilsson LB.Researcher bias and generalization of results in bias and limits of agreement analyses:a commentary based on the review of 50 Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica papers using the Altman-Bland approach[J].Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,2006,50(9):1111-1113.
[8]Critchley LA,Lee A,Ho AM.A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output[J].Anesth Analg,2010,111(5):1180-1192.
[9]Zaki R,Bulgiba A,Ismail R,et al.Statistical methods used to test for agreement of medical instruments measuring continuous variables in method comparison studies:a systematic review[J].PLo S One,2012,7(5):e37908.
[10]Chhapola V,Kanwal SK,Brar R.Reporting standards for Bland-Altman agreement analysis in laboratory research:a cross-sectional survey of current practice[J].Ann Clin Biochem,2015,52(3):382-386.
[11]Olofsen E,Dahan A,Borsboom G,et al.Improvements in the application and reporting of advanced Bland-Altman methods of comparison[J].J Clin Monit Comput,2015,29(1):127-139.
[12]Abu-Arafeh A,Jordan H,Drummond G.Reporting of method comparison studies:a review of advice,an assessment of current practice,and specific suggestions for future reports[J].Briti J Anaesthesia,2016,117(5):569.
[13]闻浩,陆梦洁,刘玉秀,等.定量测量Bland-Altman一致性评价方法研究及临床应用[J].医学研究生学报,2015,28(10):1107-1111.
[14]杨建鑫,鲁立,左琦,等.医学期刊论文中的析因设计、生存分析及Bland-Altman法常见错误分析[J].编辑学报,2016,28(3):234-236.
[15]季新强,刘志民.Delphi法及其在医学研究和决策中的应用[J].中国药物依赖性杂志,2006,15(6):422-426.
[16]曾光主编.现代流行病学方法与应用[M].北京:北京医科大学大学中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1994,250-270.
[17]Moher D,Schulz KF,Simera I,et al.Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines[J].PLo S Med,2010,7(2):e1000217.
[2]Bland JM,Altman DG.Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement[J].Lancet,1986,1(8476):307-310.
[3]Hamilton C,Stamey J.Using Bland-Altman to Assess Agreement between Two Medical Devices-Don’t Forget the Confidence Intervals![J]J Clin Monit Comput,2007,21(6):331-333.
[4]刘甜甜,钟伟华,陆梦洁,等.2014~2016年中国Bland-Altman方法一致性评价的报告质量研究[J].中国循证医学杂志,2018,18(1):67-73.
[5]Mantha S,Roizen MF,Fleisher LA,et al.Comparing methods of clinical measurement:reporting standards for bland and altman analysis[J].Anesth Analg,2000,90(3):593.
[6]Dewitte K,Fierens C,St9ckl D,et al.Application of the Bland-Altman plot for interpretation of method-comparison studies:a critical investigation of its practice[J].Clin Chem,2002,48(5):801-802.
[7]Berthelsen PG,Nilsson LB.Researcher bias and generalization of results in bias and limits of agreement analyses:a commentary based on the review of 50 Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica papers using the Altman-Bland approach[J].Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,2006,50(9):1111-1113.
[8]Critchley LA,Lee A,Ho AM.A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output[J].Anesth Analg,2010,111(5):1180-1192.
[9]Zaki R,Bulgiba A,Ismail R,et al.Statistical methods used to test for agreement of medical instruments measuring continuous variables in method comparison studies:a systematic review[J].PLo S One,2012,7(5):e37908.
[10]Chhapola V,Kanwal SK,Brar R.Reporting standards for Bland-Altman agreement analysis in laboratory research:a cross-sectional survey of current practice[J].Ann Clin Biochem,2015,52(3):382-386.
[11]Olofsen E,Dahan A,Borsboom G,et al.Improvements in the application and reporting of advanced Bland-Altman methods of comparison[J].J Clin Monit Comput,2015,29(1):127-139.
[12]Abu-Arafeh A,Jordan H,Drummond G.Reporting of method comparison studies:a review of advice,an assessment of current practice,and specific suggestions for future reports[J].Briti J Anaesthesia,2016,117(5):569.
[13]闻浩,陆梦洁,刘玉秀,等.定量测量Bland-Altman一致性评价方法研究及临床应用[J].医学研究生学报,2015,28(10):1107-1111.
[14]杨建鑫,鲁立,左琦,等.医学期刊论文中的析因设计、生存分析及Bland-Altman法常见错误分析[J].编辑学报,2016,28(3):234-236.
[15]季新强,刘志民.Delphi法及其在医学研究和决策中的应用[J].中国药物依赖性杂志,2006,15(6):422-426.
[16]曾光主编.现代流行病学方法与应用[M].北京:北京医科大学大学中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1994,250-270.
[17]Moher D,Schulz KF,Simera I,et al.Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines[J].PLo S Med,2010,7(2):e1000217.