生态语言学的多样化发展趋势与超学科属性(Ⅰ)——Andrew Goatly与Stephen Cowley教授生态语言学新思想
|
摘要
文章介绍了2018年10月9日至24日在北京外国语大学中国外语与教育研究中心举办的生态语言学专题系列讲座。来自香港岭南大学的Andrew Goatly教授与来自南丹麦大学的Stephen Cowley教授从生态语言学的多样化发展趋势、生态语言学的多学科融合与生态话语分析范式研究三个角度进行了主题讲座,探讨了生态语言学的发展前景与其超学科属性。讲座表明,多学科间相互交叉融合是超学科属性的体现,为生态语言学的多样化发展指明了方向。本系列讲座的成功举办顺应了学科发展潮流,反映了学界对学科的新思考。
This paper introduces the series of lectures about ecolinguistics held by National Research Centre for Foreign Language Education,Beijing Foreign Studies University from October 9 to October 24,2018. Professor Andrew Goatly from Lingnan University and Professor Stephen Cowley from University of Southern Denmark give ten lectures mainly from three perspectives: the diversified development trend,multidiscipline conflation and the study of ecological discourse analysis. In the lectures,it is shown that the multidiscipline conflation is the manifestation of transdisciplinarity and gives the direction of the diversified development of ecolinguistics. By prospecting the future of ecolinguistics,the lectures conform to the trend of discipline development and reflect some new thinking of ecolinguists.
This paper introduces the series of lectures about ecolinguistics held by National Research Centre for Foreign Language Education,Beijing Foreign Studies University from October 9 to October 24,2018. Professor Andrew Goatly from Lingnan University and Professor Stephen Cowley from University of Southern Denmark give ten lectures mainly from three perspectives: the diversified development trend,multidiscipline conflation and the study of ecological discourse analysis. In the lectures,it is shown that the multidiscipline conflation is the manifestation of transdisciplinarity and gives the direction of the diversified development of ecolinguistics. By prospecting the future of ecolinguistics,the lectures conform to the trend of discipline development and reflect some new thinking of ecolinguists.
引文
[1]李颖,冯志伟.计算语言学的超学科研究[J].现代外语,2015,(3):407-415.
[2]何伟.关于生态语言学作为一门学科的几个重要问题[J].中国外语,2018,(4):1+11-17.
[3]Chomsky,N.Aspects of the Theory of Syntax[M].Cambridge,MA:MIT Press,1965.
[4]Halliday,M.A.K.New ways of meaning:the challenge to applied linguistics[J].Journal of Applied Linguistics,1990,(6):7-36.
[5]Haugen,E.The ecology of language[A].In Dil,A.S.(ed.).The Ecology of Language:Essays by Einar Haugen[C].Stanford:Stanford University Press,1972:325-339.
[6]Steffensen,S.V.The microecological grounding of language:how linguistic symbolicity extends and transforms the human ecology[A].In Fill,A.F.&Penz,H.(eds.).The Routeledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics[C].New York:Routeledge,2018:393-405.
[7]Steffensen,S.V.&Fill,A.F.Ecolinguistics:the state of the art and future horizons[J].Language Sciences,2014,(41):6-25.
[8]Martin,J.R.Positive discourse analysis:solidarity and change[J].Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses,2004,(49):179-200.
[9]Stibbe,A.Ecolinguistics:Language,Ecology and the Stories We Live By[M].London:Routledge,2015.
[10]Langacker,R.W.Foundations of Cognitive Grammar(Vol.2:Descriptive Applications)[M].Stanford:Stanford University Press,1991.
[11]Lovelock,J.The Ages of Gaia[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1988.
[12]Kalupahana,D.J.Causality:The Central Philosophy of Buddhism[M].Honolulu:University Press of Hawaii,1975.
[13]Bohm,D.&Hiley,B.On the intuitive understanding of non-locality as implied by quantum theory[J].Foundations of Physics,1975,5(1):93-109.
[14]Capra,F.The Tao of Physics[M].London:Flamingo,1982.
[15]Coward,R.&Ellis,J.Language and Materialism:Developments in Semiology and the Theory of the Subject[M].London Boston:Routledge and Paul,1977.
[16]Jones,P.E.Why there is no such thing as“critical discourse analysis”[J].Language&Communication,2007,27(4):337-368.
[17]Cobley,P.Cultural Implications of Biosemiotics[M].London:Springer,2016.
[18]Thomas,R.G.Edward Thomas:A Portrait[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1987.
[19]何伟,魏榕.生态语言学:整体化与多样化的发展趋势---《语言科学》主编苏内·沃克·斯特芬森博士访谈录[J].国外社会科学,2017,(4):145-151.
[20]何伟,魏榕.生态语言学:发展历程与学科属性[J].国外社会科学,2018,(4):113-123.
[2]何伟.关于生态语言学作为一门学科的几个重要问题[J].中国外语,2018,(4):1+11-17.
[3]Chomsky,N.Aspects of the Theory of Syntax[M].Cambridge,MA:MIT Press,1965.
[4]Halliday,M.A.K.New ways of meaning:the challenge to applied linguistics[J].Journal of Applied Linguistics,1990,(6):7-36.
[5]Haugen,E.The ecology of language[A].In Dil,A.S.(ed.).The Ecology of Language:Essays by Einar Haugen[C].Stanford:Stanford University Press,1972:325-339.
[6]Steffensen,S.V.The microecological grounding of language:how linguistic symbolicity extends and transforms the human ecology[A].In Fill,A.F.&Penz,H.(eds.).The Routeledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics[C].New York:Routeledge,2018:393-405.
[7]Steffensen,S.V.&Fill,A.F.Ecolinguistics:the state of the art and future horizons[J].Language Sciences,2014,(41):6-25.
[8]Martin,J.R.Positive discourse analysis:solidarity and change[J].Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses,2004,(49):179-200.
[9]Stibbe,A.Ecolinguistics:Language,Ecology and the Stories We Live By[M].London:Routledge,2015.
[10]Langacker,R.W.Foundations of Cognitive Grammar(Vol.2:Descriptive Applications)[M].Stanford:Stanford University Press,1991.
[11]Lovelock,J.The Ages of Gaia[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1988.
[12]Kalupahana,D.J.Causality:The Central Philosophy of Buddhism[M].Honolulu:University Press of Hawaii,1975.
[13]Bohm,D.&Hiley,B.On the intuitive understanding of non-locality as implied by quantum theory[J].Foundations of Physics,1975,5(1):93-109.
[14]Capra,F.The Tao of Physics[M].London:Flamingo,1982.
[15]Coward,R.&Ellis,J.Language and Materialism:Developments in Semiology and the Theory of the Subject[M].London Boston:Routledge and Paul,1977.
[16]Jones,P.E.Why there is no such thing as“critical discourse analysis”[J].Language&Communication,2007,27(4):337-368.
[17]Cobley,P.Cultural Implications of Biosemiotics[M].London:Springer,2016.
[18]Thomas,R.G.Edward Thomas:A Portrait[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1987.
[19]何伟,魏榕.生态语言学:整体化与多样化的发展趋势---《语言科学》主编苏内·沃克·斯特芬森博士访谈录[J].国外社会科学,2017,(4):145-151.
[20]何伟,魏榕.生态语言学:发展历程与学科属性[J].国外社会科学,2018,(4):113-123.