研究生导师责权机制的法理弹性
|
摘要
现代法治国家的法律具有双重属性:硬性和弹性。两者彼此依赖,相得益彰。我国高校研究生导师与研究生的关系长期纠缠于法理、伦理与公众情感之间,成为社会舆论的焦点。研究生导师责权机制具有法理弹性,深度观察和探讨研究生教育的师生关系,冷静地分析导师和研究生的责权边界,充分考虑教育法律制度的软法属性,将刚性规范与软性规定进行合理组合,形成优良的教育法律制度,是现代大学治理的应有之义。这既能消除研究生导师的责权冲突,又能体现自由平等的法治理念。
The law of modern society has two attributes:rigidity and flexibility.The two depend on each other and complement each other.The teacher-student relationship between graduate supervisors and graduate students in China has long been entangled between legal principles,ethics and public sentiment,and has become the focus of public opinion.Since the mechanism of responsibility and power for graduate supervisors has jurisprudential flexibility,it is imperative to establish a sound educational legal system by in-depth observation and exploration of the teacher-student relationship in graduate education,rational analysis of the responsibilities and boundaries between supervisors and graduate students,comprehensive consideration of the soft law attributes of educational legal system,and integration of rigid norms and soft regulations,so as to eliminate the conflict between responsibility and power for graduate supervisors and embody freedom and equality of the rule of law.
The law of modern society has two attributes:rigidity and flexibility.The two depend on each other and complement each other.The teacher-student relationship between graduate supervisors and graduate students in China has long been entangled between legal principles,ethics and public sentiment,and has become the focus of public opinion.Since the mechanism of responsibility and power for graduate supervisors has jurisprudential flexibility,it is imperative to establish a sound educational legal system by in-depth observation and exploration of the teacher-student relationship in graduate education,rational analysis of the responsibilities and boundaries between supervisors and graduate students,comprehensive consideration of the soft law attributes of educational legal system,and integration of rigid norms and soft regulations,so as to eliminate the conflict between responsibility and power for graduate supervisors and embody freedom and equality of the rule of law.
引文
[1]张训.法律的弹性与硬性[N].检察日报,2018-03-29(3).
[2]张萧然.“寒门博士”之死拷问师生权界[N].中国产经新闻,2018-01-23(1).
[3]北京大学研究生培养机制改革办法(2006年6月20日第616次校长办公会讨论通过)[EB/OL].[2015-11-30].http://www.gsm.pku.edu.cn/UserFiles/yjssc2007.doc.
[4]中国农业大学实行学术道德导师责任制[EB/OL].(2010-04-13)[2018-07-22].http://www.edu.cn/zhong_guo_jiao_yu/gao_deng/gao_ji ao_news/201004/t20100413_464753.shtml.
[5]教育部国家发展改革委财政部关于深化研究生教育改革的意见[EB/OL].[2018-09-23].http://old.moe.gov.cn/publicfiles/business/htm lfiles/moe/A22_zcwj/201307/154118.html.
[6]杨颖秀.研究生导师的职责和责任在摩擦地带的法律审视[J].中国教育法制评论,2015,13:57-65.
[7]张伟,段世飞.美国大学校园性骚扰行为及其应对机制研究[J].比较教育研究,2017(4):91-98.
[8]佘宗明.从陈小武性骚扰到“寒门博士”之死:莫让导师权力成“脱缰之马”[EB/OL].[2018-05-04].http://news.cctv.com/2018/01/20/ARTI5kQ0M f MNAHIq HEdsNa9Y180120.shtml.
[9]湛中乐.教育法学的理论体系与学科建设[J].中国教育法制评论,2015,13:12-33.
[10]周云.规范导师和研究生关系《劳动法》不能缺位[N].羊城晚报,2016-05-30(A10).
[11]董泽芳.关于博士生招生制度改革之我见[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2014,53(6):157-162.
[12]梁剑兵.软法律论纲[EB/OL].(2005-12-10)[2018-04-26].http://www.law-lib.com/lw/lw_view.asp?no=6558.
[13]伍劲松.行政判断余地之理论、范围及其规制[J].法学评论,2010,28(3):146-154.
[14]陈超,顾淑霞.研究生培养中学术门户现象探析及对策研究[J].比较教育研究,2001(11):41-46.
[2]张萧然.“寒门博士”之死拷问师生权界[N].中国产经新闻,2018-01-23(1).
[3]北京大学研究生培养机制改革办法(2006年6月20日第616次校长办公会讨论通过)[EB/OL].[2015-11-30].http://www.gsm.pku.edu.cn/UserFiles/yjssc2007.doc.
[4]中国农业大学实行学术道德导师责任制[EB/OL].(2010-04-13)[2018-07-22].http://www.edu.cn/zhong_guo_jiao_yu/gao_deng/gao_ji ao_news/201004/t20100413_464753.shtml.
[5]教育部国家发展改革委财政部关于深化研究生教育改革的意见[EB/OL].[2018-09-23].http://old.moe.gov.cn/publicfiles/business/htm lfiles/moe/A22_zcwj/201307/154118.html.
[6]杨颖秀.研究生导师的职责和责任在摩擦地带的法律审视[J].中国教育法制评论,2015,13:57-65.
[7]张伟,段世飞.美国大学校园性骚扰行为及其应对机制研究[J].比较教育研究,2017(4):91-98.
[8]佘宗明.从陈小武性骚扰到“寒门博士”之死:莫让导师权力成“脱缰之马”[EB/OL].[2018-05-04].http://news.cctv.com/2018/01/20/ARTI5kQ0M f MNAHIq HEdsNa9Y180120.shtml.
[9]湛中乐.教育法学的理论体系与学科建设[J].中国教育法制评论,2015,13:12-33.
[10]周云.规范导师和研究生关系《劳动法》不能缺位[N].羊城晚报,2016-05-30(A10).
[11]董泽芳.关于博士生招生制度改革之我见[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2014,53(6):157-162.
[12]梁剑兵.软法律论纲[EB/OL].(2005-12-10)[2018-04-26].http://www.law-lib.com/lw/lw_view.asp?no=6558.
[13]伍劲松.行政判断余地之理论、范围及其规制[J].法学评论,2010,28(3):146-154.
[14]陈超,顾淑霞.研究生培养中学术门户现象探析及对策研究[J].比较教育研究,2001(11):41-46.