新时代法治新动能研究
|
摘要
致力于提高新时代法治的治理效能,响应新时代法治建设的新要求,从法治新动能角度审视法治主体、法治行为和法律规制等层面的重要问题。在新时代法治主体方面,除既有国家维度、社会维度之外,突出新时代法治主体的多元性和协同化。在新时代法治行为方面,强化从人民法治立场、共建共治共享理念角度审视法治行为的现实变革和未来发展需求。在新时代法律规制方面,主张从法治体系协调发展角度,丰富激励法治规制和创新法治规制体系。
In the background of constructing a rule-of-law country in the new era, this paper examines the important issues of the subject, action and legal regulation of the rule of law from the perspective of new momentum, in order to improve the governance efficiency and respond to the new requirements of the rule of law. In terms of the subject, besides the existing national and social dimensions, the diversity and synergy of the subject of rule of law in the new era are highlighted. In legal action, we should strengthen the perspective of the people's standpoint and the concepts of co-construction, co-governance and sharing to examine the current changes and future development needs of the rule of law. In the aspect of legal regulation, we advocate enriching and encouraging the rule of law regulation and innovating the legal regulation system from the perspective of coordinated development of the legal system.
In the background of constructing a rule-of-law country in the new era, this paper examines the important issues of the subject, action and legal regulation of the rule of law from the perspective of new momentum, in order to improve the governance efficiency and respond to the new requirements of the rule of law. In terms of the subject, besides the existing national and social dimensions, the diversity and synergy of the subject of rule of law in the new era are highlighted. In legal action, we should strengthen the perspective of the people's standpoint and the concepts of co-construction, co-governance and sharing to examine the current changes and future development needs of the rule of law. In the aspect of legal regulation, we advocate enriching and encouraging the rule of law regulation and innovating the legal regulation system from the perspective of coordinated development of the legal system.
引文
[1]张志铭.三维法治观—中国法治建设的主体建构[EB/OL].(2018-05-23)https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/GNBOpdY5G5ZgWRzE-g14dQ.
[2]武建敏.个人与国家之间:当代法文化的价值观[J].河北法学,2012,(7).
[3]范明志.中国法治理论完善了法治的人民性[J].理论导报,2017,(5).
[4]付子堂,任懿.“人民”的话语实践——关于“文化大革命”时期“人民”内涵流变的法理学反思[J].学习与探索,2012,(3).
[5]叶竹盛.法治的供给侧改革[J].人民法治,2016,(4).
[6]张文显.法治化是国家治理现代化的必由之路[J].法制与社会发展,2014,(5).
[7]齐卫平,姜裕富.国家治理现代化的法治思维[J].河南师范大学学报,2015,(4).
[8]彭新林.国家监察体制改革:历史借鉴与现实动因[J].法学杂志,2019,(1).
[9]郁建兴,任杰.中国基层社会治理中的自治、法治与德治[J].学术月刊,2018,(12).
[10]张文显.“未来法治”当为长远发展谋[N].新华日报,2018-12-4.
[11]郑戈.国家治理法治化语境中的精准治理[J].人民论坛·学术前沿,2018,(10).
[12]涂子沛.大数据[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2015.
[13]熊瑛.形式法治和实质法治:法治思维观的比较与抉择[J].领导科学,2014,(11).
[14]陈金钊.法学意义上的法治思维[J].国家检察官学院学报,2017,(1).
[15]倪正茂.从法律激励看对中国法律文化传统的继承[J].法学,2014,(1).
[16]丰霏.当代中国法律激励的实践样态[J].法制与社会发展,2015,(5).
[17]侯宏伟,马培衢.“自治、法治、德治”三治融合体系下治理主体嵌入型共治机制的构建[J].华南师范大学学报,2018,(6).
[18]姬亚平.机构改革对行政复议与诉讼的新要求[J].人民法治,2018,(Z1).
[19]胡锦光.论推进合宪性审查工作的体系化[J].法律科学,2018,(2).
[2]武建敏.个人与国家之间:当代法文化的价值观[J].河北法学,2012,(7).
[3]范明志.中国法治理论完善了法治的人民性[J].理论导报,2017,(5).
[4]付子堂,任懿.“人民”的话语实践——关于“文化大革命”时期“人民”内涵流变的法理学反思[J].学习与探索,2012,(3).
[5]叶竹盛.法治的供给侧改革[J].人民法治,2016,(4).
[6]张文显.法治化是国家治理现代化的必由之路[J].法制与社会发展,2014,(5).
[7]齐卫平,姜裕富.国家治理现代化的法治思维[J].河南师范大学学报,2015,(4).
[8]彭新林.国家监察体制改革:历史借鉴与现实动因[J].法学杂志,2019,(1).
[9]郁建兴,任杰.中国基层社会治理中的自治、法治与德治[J].学术月刊,2018,(12).
[10]张文显.“未来法治”当为长远发展谋[N].新华日报,2018-12-4.
[11]郑戈.国家治理法治化语境中的精准治理[J].人民论坛·学术前沿,2018,(10).
[12]涂子沛.大数据[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2015.
[13]熊瑛.形式法治和实质法治:法治思维观的比较与抉择[J].领导科学,2014,(11).
[14]陈金钊.法学意义上的法治思维[J].国家检察官学院学报,2017,(1).
[15]倪正茂.从法律激励看对中国法律文化传统的继承[J].法学,2014,(1).
[16]丰霏.当代中国法律激励的实践样态[J].法制与社会发展,2015,(5).
[17]侯宏伟,马培衢.“自治、法治、德治”三治融合体系下治理主体嵌入型共治机制的构建[J].华南师范大学学报,2018,(6).
[18]姬亚平.机构改革对行政复议与诉讼的新要求[J].人民法治,2018,(Z1).
[19]胡锦光.论推进合宪性审查工作的体系化[J].法律科学,2018,(2).