论拉吕埃勒对巴迪欧数学本体论的批判
摘要
巴迪欧基于对哲学终结论和海德格尔的"诗性本体论"的批判提出数学本体论,认为数学本体论是在相对主义占主流的今天重建普遍主义的唯一道路和言说存在的唯一途径。拉吕埃勒立足于"非哲学"的立场对巴迪欧数学本体论给予了批判。拉吕埃勒认为,巴迪欧的数学客观性表象之下隐藏着集权主义本质,他通过数学"再教育"哲学是一种"恐怖的纯化",不仅"纯化"了哲学的具体内容和外在形式,同时也肢解了哲学本身的内在整体性。拉吕埃勒的批判确实揭示了巴迪欧哲学的一些问题,但拉吕埃勒的"非哲学"本身也存在矛盾之处。
引文
(1)参见Alain Badiou,Infinite Thought:Truth and the Return to Philosophy,Continuum,2004,p.56。
(1)Alain Badiou,Being and Event,Continuum,2005,p.16.
(2)Ibid.
(3)参见Alain Badiou,Manifesto for Philosophy,State University of New York Press,1999,p.74。
(4)参见Alain Badiou,Being and Event,p.31。
(5)Fran9ois Laruelle,Anti-Badiou:The Introduction of Maoism in Philosophy,Bloomsbury Press,2013,p.xxi.
(6)Alain Badiou,Being and Event,p.13.
(1)Alain Badiou,Being and Event,p.68.
(2)Ibid.,p.44.
(3)Ibid.,p.11.
(4)Fran9ois Laruelle,Anti-Badiou:The Introduction of Maoism in Philosophy,p.xxvi.
(5)参见John Mullarkey and Anthony Paul Smith,Laruelle and NonPhilosophy,Edinburgh University Press,2012,p.25。
(1)Fran9ois Laruelle,Anti-Badiou:The Introduction of Maoism in Philosophy,p.xviii.
(2)Ibid.,p.183.
(3)Ibid.,p.53.
(4)Ibid.,p.81.
(5)Ibid.,p.ix.
(6)Ibid.,p.82.
(7)Ibid.,p.73.
(8)Ibid.,p.43.
(1)Fran9ois Laruelle,Anti-Badiou:The Introduction of Maoism in Philosophy,p.ix.
(2)Ibid.,p.vii.
(3)Ibid.,p.x.
(4)Ibid.,p.ix.
(5)Ian James,The New French Philosophy,Polity Press,2013,p.137.
(6)Fran9ois Laruelle,Anti-Badiou:The Introduction of Maoism in Philosophy,p.41.
(7)John Mullarkey,Post-Continental Philosophy:An Outline,Continuum International Publishing Group,2007,p.125.
(8)Fran9ois Laruelle,Anti-Badiou:The Introduction of Maoism in Philosophy,p.78.
(1)Fran9ois Laruelle,Anti-Badiou:The Introduction of Maoism in Philosophy,p.84.
(2)Ibid.,p.94.
(3)参见孙正聿:《哲学通论》,辽宁人民出版社1998年版第371页。
(4)参见Fran9ois Laruelle,Anti-Badiou:The Introduction of Maoism in Philosophy,p.48。
(5)Ibid.,p.45.
(6)Ibid.,p.x.
(7)Alain Badiou,Being and Event,p.31.
(8)参见Fran9ois Laruelle,Anti-Badiou:The Introduction of Maoism in Philosophy,p.131。
(1)参见Fran9ois Laruelle,Anti-Badiou:The Introduction of Maoism in Philosophy,p.35。
(2)John.Maoilearca,All Thoughts Are Equal:Laruelle and Nonhuman Philosophy,University of Minnesota Press,2015,p.74.
(3)Ibid.,p.91.
(4)参见John Mullarkey and Anthony Paul Smith,Laruelle and NonPhilosophy,p.14。
(1)参见黄其洪、王鸿宇:《从哲学到“非哲学”---F.拉吕埃勒的“非哲学”思想导论》,载《现代哲学》2018年第4期。
(1)Alain Badiou,Being and Event,Continuum,2005,p.16.
(2)Ibid.
(3)参见Alain Badiou,Manifesto for Philosophy,State University of New York Press,1999,p.74。
(4)参见Alain Badiou,Being and Event,p.31。
(5)Fran9ois Laruelle,Anti-Badiou:The Introduction of Maoism in Philosophy,Bloomsbury Press,2013,p.xxi.
(6)Alain Badiou,Being and Event,p.13.
(1)Alain Badiou,Being and Event,p.68.
(2)Ibid.,p.44.
(3)Ibid.,p.11.
(4)Fran9ois Laruelle,Anti-Badiou:The Introduction of Maoism in Philosophy,p.xxvi.
(5)参见John Mullarkey and Anthony Paul Smith,Laruelle and NonPhilosophy,Edinburgh University Press,2012,p.25。
(1)Fran9ois Laruelle,Anti-Badiou:The Introduction of Maoism in Philosophy,p.xviii.
(2)Ibid.,p.183.
(3)Ibid.,p.53.
(4)Ibid.,p.81.
(5)Ibid.,p.ix.
(6)Ibid.,p.82.
(7)Ibid.,p.73.
(8)Ibid.,p.43.
(1)Fran9ois Laruelle,Anti-Badiou:The Introduction of Maoism in Philosophy,p.ix.
(2)Ibid.,p.vii.
(3)Ibid.,p.x.
(4)Ibid.,p.ix.
(5)Ian James,The New French Philosophy,Polity Press,2013,p.137.
(6)Fran9ois Laruelle,Anti-Badiou:The Introduction of Maoism in Philosophy,p.41.
(7)John Mullarkey,Post-Continental Philosophy:An Outline,Continuum International Publishing Group,2007,p.125.
(8)Fran9ois Laruelle,Anti-Badiou:The Introduction of Maoism in Philosophy,p.78.
(1)Fran9ois Laruelle,Anti-Badiou:The Introduction of Maoism in Philosophy,p.84.
(2)Ibid.,p.94.
(3)参见孙正聿:《哲学通论》,辽宁人民出版社1998年版第371页。
(4)参见Fran9ois Laruelle,Anti-Badiou:The Introduction of Maoism in Philosophy,p.48。
(5)Ibid.,p.45.
(6)Ibid.,p.x.
(7)Alain Badiou,Being and Event,p.31.
(8)参见Fran9ois Laruelle,Anti-Badiou:The Introduction of Maoism in Philosophy,p.131。
(1)参见Fran9ois Laruelle,Anti-Badiou:The Introduction of Maoism in Philosophy,p.35。
(2)John.Maoilearca,All Thoughts Are Equal:Laruelle and Nonhuman Philosophy,University of Minnesota Press,2015,p.74.
(3)Ibid.,p.91.
(4)参见John Mullarkey and Anthony Paul Smith,Laruelle and NonPhilosophy,p.14。
(1)参见黄其洪、王鸿宇:《从哲学到“非哲学”---F.拉吕埃勒的“非哲学”思想导论》,载《现代哲学》2018年第4期。