风险决策的概率权重偏差:心理机制与优化策略
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Probability weighting bias in risky decision making:Psychological mechanism and optimizing strategies
  • 作者:孙庆洲 ; 邬青渊 ; 张静 ; 江程铭 ; 赵雷 ; 胡凤培
  • 英文作者:SUN Qingzhou;WU Qingyuan;ZHANG Jing;JIANG Chengming;ZHAO Lei;HU Fengpei;School of Management, Zhejiang University of Technology;
  • 关键词:概率权重偏差 ; 结果维度 ; 概率维度 ; 参照点 ; 情绪体验 ; 优化策略
  • 英文关键词:probability weighting bias;;outcome dimension;;probability dimension;;reference point;;emotional experience;;optimizing strategy
  • 中文刊名:XLXD
  • 英文刊名:Advances in Psychological Science
  • 机构:浙江工业大学管理学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-03-21 09:02
  • 出版单位:心理科学进展
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.27;No.225
  • 基金:教育部人文社科青年基金项目(No.18YJC630155);; 国家自然科学基金青年项目(No.71801193);; 国家社科基金(No.14BSH070)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:XLXD201905013
  • 页数:9
  • CN:05
  • ISSN:11-4766/R
  • 分类号:149-157
摘要
概率权重偏差指人对事件发生的主观概率估计与客观概率的差异。它影响投资、投保、医患沟通等方面。"重结果轻概率"的非补偿性策略和参照点诱发的情绪波动会引发概率权重偏差;改变"概率"的描述形式、"结果"的情绪体验、"损益"的参照点、风险的心理距离等可调整权重偏差、优化决策。未来需深究权重偏差的适用情境、机制关联及偏差辨别等问题。
        Probability weighting bias refers to the deviation between the perceived likelihood and the objective likelihood of an event, which affects investment, insurance, doctor-patient communications, etc.The non-compensatory strategy in which people give more weight to "outcomes" than "probabilities", and the emotional fluctuation induced by the reference point cause probability weighting bias; changing the description of "probabilities", emotional experience of "outcomes", reference point of "gains and losses",and psychological distance from risk, can adjust such bias and optimize decision-making. Future studies need to further explore the issues, such as its application situations, mechanism correlations, and the identification of probability weighting bias.
引文
吉仁泽(德),泽尔腾(德),(2016).有限理性:适应性工具箱(刘永芳译).清华大学出版社.北京.
    李纾.(2016).决策心理:齐当别之道.华东师范大学出版社.上海.
    梁哲,李纾,许洁虹.(2007).预期理论权重函数π的由来,质疑及Tversky的阐释.经济数学,24(4),331-340.
    孙庆洲.(2017).社会距离对概率估计偏差的影响:情绪占优抑或认知占优?(博士学位论文).华东师范大学.上海.
    汪祚军,李纾.(2012).对整合模型和占优启发式模型的检验:基于信息加工过程的眼动研究证据.心理学报,44(2),179-198.
    新浪科技.(2018).滴滴:2017年订单量74.3亿平均每人用滴滴打过5次车.2018年1月8摘自http://tech.sina.com.cn/i/2018-01-08/doc-ifyqkarr7931333.shtml
    中国消费者协会.(2019).2018年十大消费维权舆情热点.2019年1月10摘自http://www.cca.org.cn/zxsd/detail/28364.html
    中国新闻网.(2018).女孩滴滴顺风车遇害案被告人被提起公诉案件回顾.2018年11月17摘自http://www.chinanews.com/sh/2018/11-17/8679360.shtml
    Athey,S.(2017).Beyond prediction:Using big data for policy problems.Science,355(6324),483-485.
    Brandst?tter,E.,Gigerenzer,G.,&Hertwig,R.(2006).The priority heuristic:Making choices without trade-offs.Psychological Review,113(2),409-432.
    Brandst?tter,E.,Kühberger,A.,&Schneider,F.(2002).Acognitive-emotional account of the shape of the probability weighting function.Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,15(2),79-100.
    Diederich,A.,&Oswald,P.(2016).Multi-stage sequential sampling models with finite or infinite time horizon and variable boundaries.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,74,128-145.
    Evans,J.S.B.T.,Handley,S.J.,Perham,N.,Over,D.E.,&Thompson,V.A.(2000).Frequency versus probability formats in statistical word problems.Cognition,77(3),197-213.
    Fagerlin,A.,Zikmund-Fisher,B.J.,&Ubel,P.A.(2011).Helping patients decide:Ten steps to better risk communication.Journal of the National Cancer Institute,103(19),1436-1443.
    Faro,D.,&Rottenstreich,Y.(2006).Affect,empathy,and regressive mispredictions of others’preferences under risk.Management Science,52(4),529-541.
    Fisher,G.(2017).An attentional drift diffusion model over binary-attribute choice.Cognition,168,34-45.
    Fox,C.R.,&Poldrack,R.A.(2009).Prospect theory and the brain.Neuroeconomics:Decision Making and the Brain,145-174.
    Gonzalez,R.,&Wu,G.(1999).On the shape of the probability weighting function.Cognitive Psychology,38,129-166.
    Hansen,J.V.,Jacobsen,R.H.,&Lau,M.I.(2016).Willingness to pay for insurance in Denmark.Journal of Risk and Insurance,83(1),49-76.
    Hey,J.D.,Morone,A.,&Schmidt,U.(2009).Noise and bias in eliciting preferences.Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,39(3),213-235.
    Kahneman,D.,&Tversky,A.(1979).Prospect theory:An analysis of decision under risk.Econometrica,47(2),267-291.
    Kliger,D.,&Levy,O.(2008).Mood impacts on probability weighting functions:“Large-gamble”evidence.The Journal of Socio-Economics,37(4),1397-1411.
    Lermer,E.,Streicher,B.,Sachs,R.,Raue,M.,&Frey,D.(2015).Thinking concrete increases the perceived likelihood of risks:The effect of construal level on risk estimation.Risk Analysis,36(3),623-637.
    Lichtenstein,S.,&Slovic,P.(1971).Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions.Journal of Experimental Psychology,89(1),46-55.
    Li,L.B.,He,S.H.,Li,S.,Xu,J.H.,&Rao,L.L.(2009).Acloser look at the Russian roulette problem:Are-examination of the nonlinearity of the prospect theory’s decision weightπ.International Journal of Approximate Reasoning,50(3),515-520.
    Li,S.(1995).Is there a decision weightπ?Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,27(3),263-291.
    Litchfield,J.,&Piza,C.(2017).Estimating the willingness to pay for tenure security in Brazilian Favelas(working paper series).Department of Economic,University of Sussex.
    McGraw,A.P.,Todorov,A.,&Kunreuther,H.(2011).Apolicy maker’s dilemma:Preventing terrorism or preventing blame.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,115(1),25-34.
    Mullett,T.L.,&Stewart,N.(2016).Implications of visual attention phenomena for models of preferential choice.Decision,3(4),231-253.
    Oudhoff,J.P.,&Timmermans,D.R.(2015).The effect of different graphical and numerical likelihood formats on perception of likelihood and choice.Medical Decision Making,35(4),487-500.
    Pachur,T.,Hertwig,R.,&Wolkewitz,R.(2014).The affect gap in risky choice:Affect-rich outcomes attenuate attention to probability information.Decision,1(1),64-78.
    Pachur,T.,Schulte-Mecklenbeck,M.,Murphy,R.O.,&Hertwig,R.(2018).Prospect theory reflects selective allocation of attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,147(2),147-169.
    Pachur,T.,Suter,R.S.,&Hertwig,R.(2017).How the twain can meet:Prospect theory and models of heuristics in risky choice.Cognitive Psychology,93,44-73.
    Pahlke,J.,Strasser,S.,&Vieider,F.M.(2015).Responsibility effects in decision making under risk.Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,51(2),125-146.
    Prelec,D.,Seung,H.S.,&McCoy,J.(2017).A solution to the single-question crowd wisdom problem.Nature,541,532-535.
    Rottenstreich,Y.,&Hsee,C.K.(2001).Money,kisses,and electric shocks:On the affective psychology of risk.Psychological Science,12(3),185-190.
    Stone,E.R.,Yates,J.F.,&Parker,A.M.(1997).Effects of numerical and graphical displays on professed risk-taking behavior.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Applied,3(4),243-256.
    Sun,Q.Z.,Liu,Y.F.,Zhang,H.R.,&Lu,J.Y.(2017).Increased social distance makes people more risk-neutral.The Journal of Social Psychology,157(4),502-512.
    Sun,Q.Z.,Zhang,H.R.,Sai,L.Y.,&Hu,F.P.(2018).Self-distancing reduces probability-weighting biases.Frontiers in Psychology,9,611.
    Sun,Q.Z.,Zhang,H.R.,Zhang,J.,&Zhang,X.N.(2018).Why can’t we accurately predict others’decisions?Prediction discrepancy in risky decision-making.Frontiers in Psychology,9,2190.
    Suter,R.S.,Pachur,T.,&Hertwig,R.(2016).How affect shapes risky choice:Distorted probability weighting versus probability neglect.Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,29(4),437-449.
    Suter,R.S.,Pachur,T.,Hertwig,R.,Endestad,T.,&Biele,G.(2015).The neural basis of risky choice with affective outcomes.PloS One,10,e0122475.
    Trautmann,S.T.,&van de Kuilen,G.(2012).Prospect theory or construal level theory?Diminishing sensitivity vs.psychological distance in risky decisions.Acta Psychologica,139(1),254-260.
    Trope,Y.,&Liberman,N.(2010).Construal-level theory of psychological distance.Psychological Review,117(2),440-463.
    Tversky,A.,&Kahneman,D.(1992).Advances in prospect theory:Cumulative representation of uncertainty.Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,5(4),297-323.
    Tyszka,T.,&Sawicki,P.(2011).Affective and cognitive factors influencing sensitivity to probabilistic information.Risk Analysis,31(11),1832-1845.
    Venkatraman,V.,Payne,J.W.,&Huettel,S.A.(2014).An overall probability of winning heuristic for complex risky decisions:Choice and eye fixation evidence.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,125(2),73-87.
    Wang,Z.J.,Kuang,Y.,Tang,H.Y.,Gao,C.,Chen,A.,&Chan,K.Q.(2018).Are decisions made by group representatives more risk averse?The effect of sense of responsibility.Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,31(3),311-323.
    Williams,L.E.,Stein,R.,&Galguera,L.(2014).The distinct affective consequences of psychological distance and construal level.Journal of Consumer Research,40(6),1123-1138.
    Zipkin,D.A.,Umscheid,C.A.,Keating,N.L.,Allen,E.,Aung,K.,Beyth,R.,...Feldstein,D.A.(2014).Evidence-based risk communication:A systematic review.Annals of Internal Medicine,161(4),270-280.
    1 Becker-DeGroot-Marschak Method(BDM):https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Becker%E2%80%93DeGroot%E2%80%93Marschak_method

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700