基于DHGF算法的养生旅游资源评价研究——以鹞落坪国家级自然保护区为例
|
摘要
以鹞落坪国家级自然保护区为研究对象构建自然保护区养生旅游资源评价指标体系,用DH算法确定各层评价指标的权重,用GF算法综合评价鹞落坪国家级自然保护区养生旅游资源的丰富度。结果表明:在自然保护区养生旅游资源指标权重方面,养生旅游资源自身条件的权重值最高;在综合评价方面,鹞落坪国家级自然保护区养生旅游资源综合评价得分为7.252分,处于良好等级。在对评价结果进行深入分析的基础上,提出挖掘自然养生资源的价值、加强生态环境的保护、完善养生基础设施的建设、重视特色产业与养生文化的融合等相关建议。
(1)Background——The richness and utilization of wellness tourism resources are prerequisites for the development of wellness tourism in a region. How to scientifically and reasonably evaluate the value of wellness tourism resources in a region is not only the primary issue in the development of wellness tourism,but also a hot issue in wellness tourism. At present,researches on the evaluation of wellness tourism resources mostly focus on the overall evaluation of wellness tourism,but there are relatively few researches on the richness and value of wellness tourism resources in the scenic spot.(2)Methods——According to the attributes of wellness tourism resources and the classification criteria of tourism resources,the evaluation index system of wellness tourism resources in nature reserves are constructed based on the actual situation of tourism resources in the nature reserves and relevant research literature. The weight of evaluation index is determined by DH algorithm of DHGF algorithm,and the research object is evaluated comprehensively by GF algorithm.(3)Results——The results of the DH algorithm show that: In the comprehensive evaluation,the weights of the three evaluation indicators are ranked as follows: the own conditions of wellness tourism resources>the environmental conditions of wellness tourism resources >the development conditions of wellness tourism resources;In the project evaluation,the weight value of natural wellness resources is the largest,the environmental quality weight value is the second,and the nature reserve resources attribute weight value is the third,while the other indicators have smaller weight values; In the factor evaluation,the top three evaluation factors of weight are:wild Chinese herbal medicine,wild wellness food and natural agricultural products. These results show that the development and utilization of wellness tourism resources mainly depend on their own wellness resources and their own richness and attractiveness of wellness resources play a leading role in the development and utilization of wellness tourism in nature reserves. Through the comprehensive evaluation results of GF algorithm to wellness tourism resources of Yaoluoping National Nature Reserve,it can be seen that the evaluation of Yaoluoping wellness tourism resources is good,that is,grade II,which is suitable for the development of low-intensity wellness tourism activities.(4)Conclusions and Discussions——During the evaluation process,it is found that Yaoluoping has advantages in natural wellness resources and natural environment,but it still needs to be improved in the aspects of humanistic wellness resources and wellness infrastructure conditions. Therefore,it is suggested to excavate the value of natural wellness resources, such as Langcai, Weicai, and semen trichosanthis kirilowii, etc;strengthen the protection of the ecological environment,focus on remediation of man-made pollution and strictly control the environmental capacity of the area,etc; improve the construction of wellness infrastructure,develop a wellness bath and improve the medical conditions in the reserve; attach importance to the integration of characteristic industries and wellness culture,increase the dissemination of alpine fog tea culture,traditional Chinese medicine culture and vegetarian wellness concept,in order to enhance the influence of humanistic wellness resources.
(1)Background——The richness and utilization of wellness tourism resources are prerequisites for the development of wellness tourism in a region. How to scientifically and reasonably evaluate the value of wellness tourism resources in a region is not only the primary issue in the development of wellness tourism,but also a hot issue in wellness tourism. At present,researches on the evaluation of wellness tourism resources mostly focus on the overall evaluation of wellness tourism,but there are relatively few researches on the richness and value of wellness tourism resources in the scenic spot.(2)Methods——According to the attributes of wellness tourism resources and the classification criteria of tourism resources,the evaluation index system of wellness tourism resources in nature reserves are constructed based on the actual situation of tourism resources in the nature reserves and relevant research literature. The weight of evaluation index is determined by DH algorithm of DHGF algorithm,and the research object is evaluated comprehensively by GF algorithm.(3)Results——The results of the DH algorithm show that: In the comprehensive evaluation,the weights of the three evaluation indicators are ranked as follows: the own conditions of wellness tourism resources>the environmental conditions of wellness tourism resources >the development conditions of wellness tourism resources;In the project evaluation,the weight value of natural wellness resources is the largest,the environmental quality weight value is the second,and the nature reserve resources attribute weight value is the third,while the other indicators have smaller weight values; In the factor evaluation,the top three evaluation factors of weight are:wild Chinese herbal medicine,wild wellness food and natural agricultural products. These results show that the development and utilization of wellness tourism resources mainly depend on their own wellness resources and their own richness and attractiveness of wellness resources play a leading role in the development and utilization of wellness tourism in nature reserves. Through the comprehensive evaluation results of GF algorithm to wellness tourism resources of Yaoluoping National Nature Reserve,it can be seen that the evaluation of Yaoluoping wellness tourism resources is good,that is,grade II,which is suitable for the development of low-intensity wellness tourism activities.(4)Conclusions and Discussions——During the evaluation process,it is found that Yaoluoping has advantages in natural wellness resources and natural environment,but it still needs to be improved in the aspects of humanistic wellness resources and wellness infrastructure conditions. Therefore,it is suggested to excavate the value of natural wellness resources, such as Langcai, Weicai, and semen trichosanthis kirilowii, etc;strengthen the protection of the ecological environment,focus on remediation of man-made pollution and strictly control the environmental capacity of the area,etc; improve the construction of wellness infrastructure,develop a wellness bath and improve the medical conditions in the reserve; attach importance to the integration of characteristic industries and wellness culture,increase the dissemination of alpine fog tea culture,traditional Chinese medicine culture and vegetarian wellness concept,in order to enhance the influence of humanistic wellness resources.
引文
[1]何爱红,王亦龙.甘肃自然保护区生态旅游资源的类型及综合评价[J].干旱区资源与环境,2011,25(6):211-219.
[2]胥兴安,李柏文,杨懿,等.养生旅游理论探析[J].旅游研究,2011,3(1):40-46.
[3]汤云云,陆林.黄山市养生旅游发展研究[J].安徽师范大学学报(自然科学版),2013,36(3):283-287.
[4]杨懿,田里,胥兴安.养生旅游资源分类与评价指标体系研究[J].生态经济,2015,31(8):137-141.
[5]吕华鲜.广西猫儿山国家级自然保护区养生旅游开发研究[J].林业经济问题,2010,30(3):256-260.
[6]张玲玲,黄杰龙,曹辉.基于感官体验的竹林养生旅游创意研究[J].林业资源管理,2016(2):121-126.
[7]叶春,李渊妮,姚莉.传统中医理论视角下的养生旅游资源分类与评价研究:以贵州养生旅游资源为例[J].海南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2014,27(4):449-456.
[8]刘顺伶,王克柱,杨雪.河北野三坡养生旅游资源模糊评价研究[J].安徽农业科学,2010,38(34):19839-19841,19847.
[9]陆晓梅,张鑫,高淑春.森林养生旅游开发潜力评价研究[J].林业经济问题,2017,37(1):44-49.
[10]梁修存,丁登山.国外旅游资源评价研究进展[J].自然资源学报,2002,17(2):253-260.
[11]FAVORSKAYA M,TKACHEVA A.Rendering of wind effects in 3D landscape scenes[J].Procedia Computer Science,2013,22:1229-1238.
[12]TUAN T H,NAVRUD S.Capturing the benefits of preserving cultural heritage[J].Journal of Cultural Heritage,2008,9(3):326-337.
[13]CLARK J,BURGESS J,HARRISON C M.“I struggled with this money business”:Respondents’perspectives on contingent valuation[J].Ecological Economics,2000,33(1):45-62.
[14]徐维祥,张全寿.从定性到定量信息系统项目评价方法研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2001(3):124-127.
[15]常继峰.基于DHGF理论的公路桥梁安全性评价方法研究[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2008:21-33.
[16]谢定华,刘慧,李宁霞.基于DHGF算法的情报价值评价研究[J].情报杂志,2010,29(S1):150-152.
[17]马志强,邓博.基于DHGF算法的高校教师绩效评价体系的和谐性测评[J].统计与决策,2011(4):69-71.
[18]陈卓.基于DHGF综合集成算法的企业并购风险评估[D].北京:中央财经大学,2013:16-30.
[19]TAN C,LU Y S,ZHANG X T.Life extension and repair decision-making of ageing offshore platforms based on DHGF method[J].Ocean Engineering,2016,117:238-245.
[20]徐慧,钱谊,彭补拙,等.鹞落坪国家级自然保护区生态评价研究[J].农业环境保护,2002,21(4):360-364.
[21]戴科伟,钱谊,张益民,等.基于生态足迹的自然保护区生态承载力评估:以鹞落坪国家级自然保护区为例[J].华中师范大学学报(自然科学版),2006(3):462-466.
[22]徐先海,储小兰.鹞落坪自然保护区发展生态旅游的SWOT分析[J].长春理工大学学报(社会科学版),2012,25(9):92-93.
[23]徐业林,俞家玲.鹞落坪自然保护区环境中空气离子状况分析[J].中国卫生工程学,2006(2):65-67.
[24]王松,鲍方印,梅百茂,等.安徽鹞落坪国家级自然保护区蝶类的垂直分布及其群落多样性[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(9):2262-2270.
[25]王志高,张中信,汪文革,等.安徽岳西县鹞落坪国家级自然保护区森林群落结构的初步分析[J].植物生态学报,2016,40(6):615-619.
[26]徐淑梅.黑龙江省旅游资源评价研究[J].地理科学,2001,21(2):188-192.
[27]张结魁.区域旅游资源评价体系构想与实证研究[J].资源科学,2003,25(3):90-97.
[28]尹占娥,殷杰,许世远.上海乡村旅游资源定量评价研究[J].旅游学刊,2007(8):59-63.
[29]邓立斌,邓丽群,陈端吕.基于FAHP模型的自然保护区生态旅游资源定量评价:以西藏雅鲁藏布大峡谷国家级自然保护区为例[J].中国农学通报,2014,30(22):16-21.
[30]冯卫英,朱世桂,黎星辉.基于层次分析法的茶文化旅游资源评价:以江苏宜兴阳羡茶文化博览园为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2013,13(1):127-134.
[31]王娜,钟永德,黎森.基于AHP的森林公园科普旅游资源评价体系构建[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2015,35(9):139-143.
[32]赵大颖.基于旅游资源评价的生态小城镇养生旅游规划探索[D].北京:北京建筑大学,2016:24-36.
[2]胥兴安,李柏文,杨懿,等.养生旅游理论探析[J].旅游研究,2011,3(1):40-46.
[3]汤云云,陆林.黄山市养生旅游发展研究[J].安徽师范大学学报(自然科学版),2013,36(3):283-287.
[4]杨懿,田里,胥兴安.养生旅游资源分类与评价指标体系研究[J].生态经济,2015,31(8):137-141.
[5]吕华鲜.广西猫儿山国家级自然保护区养生旅游开发研究[J].林业经济问题,2010,30(3):256-260.
[6]张玲玲,黄杰龙,曹辉.基于感官体验的竹林养生旅游创意研究[J].林业资源管理,2016(2):121-126.
[7]叶春,李渊妮,姚莉.传统中医理论视角下的养生旅游资源分类与评价研究:以贵州养生旅游资源为例[J].海南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2014,27(4):449-456.
[8]刘顺伶,王克柱,杨雪.河北野三坡养生旅游资源模糊评价研究[J].安徽农业科学,2010,38(34):19839-19841,19847.
[9]陆晓梅,张鑫,高淑春.森林养生旅游开发潜力评价研究[J].林业经济问题,2017,37(1):44-49.
[10]梁修存,丁登山.国外旅游资源评价研究进展[J].自然资源学报,2002,17(2):253-260.
[11]FAVORSKAYA M,TKACHEVA A.Rendering of wind effects in 3D landscape scenes[J].Procedia Computer Science,2013,22:1229-1238.
[12]TUAN T H,NAVRUD S.Capturing the benefits of preserving cultural heritage[J].Journal of Cultural Heritage,2008,9(3):326-337.
[13]CLARK J,BURGESS J,HARRISON C M.“I struggled with this money business”:Respondents’perspectives on contingent valuation[J].Ecological Economics,2000,33(1):45-62.
[14]徐维祥,张全寿.从定性到定量信息系统项目评价方法研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2001(3):124-127.
[15]常继峰.基于DHGF理论的公路桥梁安全性评价方法研究[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2008:21-33.
[16]谢定华,刘慧,李宁霞.基于DHGF算法的情报价值评价研究[J].情报杂志,2010,29(S1):150-152.
[17]马志强,邓博.基于DHGF算法的高校教师绩效评价体系的和谐性测评[J].统计与决策,2011(4):69-71.
[18]陈卓.基于DHGF综合集成算法的企业并购风险评估[D].北京:中央财经大学,2013:16-30.
[19]TAN C,LU Y S,ZHANG X T.Life extension and repair decision-making of ageing offshore platforms based on DHGF method[J].Ocean Engineering,2016,117:238-245.
[20]徐慧,钱谊,彭补拙,等.鹞落坪国家级自然保护区生态评价研究[J].农业环境保护,2002,21(4):360-364.
[21]戴科伟,钱谊,张益民,等.基于生态足迹的自然保护区生态承载力评估:以鹞落坪国家级自然保护区为例[J].华中师范大学学报(自然科学版),2006(3):462-466.
[22]徐先海,储小兰.鹞落坪自然保护区发展生态旅游的SWOT分析[J].长春理工大学学报(社会科学版),2012,25(9):92-93.
[23]徐业林,俞家玲.鹞落坪自然保护区环境中空气离子状况分析[J].中国卫生工程学,2006(2):65-67.
[24]王松,鲍方印,梅百茂,等.安徽鹞落坪国家级自然保护区蝶类的垂直分布及其群落多样性[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(9):2262-2270.
[25]王志高,张中信,汪文革,等.安徽岳西县鹞落坪国家级自然保护区森林群落结构的初步分析[J].植物生态学报,2016,40(6):615-619.
[26]徐淑梅.黑龙江省旅游资源评价研究[J].地理科学,2001,21(2):188-192.
[27]张结魁.区域旅游资源评价体系构想与实证研究[J].资源科学,2003,25(3):90-97.
[28]尹占娥,殷杰,许世远.上海乡村旅游资源定量评价研究[J].旅游学刊,2007(8):59-63.
[29]邓立斌,邓丽群,陈端吕.基于FAHP模型的自然保护区生态旅游资源定量评价:以西藏雅鲁藏布大峡谷国家级自然保护区为例[J].中国农学通报,2014,30(22):16-21.
[30]冯卫英,朱世桂,黎星辉.基于层次分析法的茶文化旅游资源评价:以江苏宜兴阳羡茶文化博览园为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2013,13(1):127-134.
[31]王娜,钟永德,黎森.基于AHP的森林公园科普旅游资源评价体系构建[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2015,35(9):139-143.
[32]赵大颖.基于旅游资源评价的生态小城镇养生旅游规划探索[D].北京:北京建筑大学,2016:24-36.