摘要
对环境行政公益诉讼前置程序进行国际比较与借鉴,阐述诉前程序设置的必要性,行政规制缺乏内部救济机制,在环境公益维权背景下行政权的约束和维护之间寻求平衡。总结诉讼前置程序的价值功能:是司法谦抑性的体现,是尊重行政自主权的体现,有利于完善检察监督方式,对环境公共利益的保护和救济具有重要作用。
International comparison and reference are made on the pre-procedure of environmental administrative public interest litigation. This paper expounds the necessity of setting up pre-litigation procedure,the lack of internal relief mechanism in administrative regulation,and the balance between the restriction and maintenance of administrative power under the background of environmental public welfare protection. Summarizing the value function of the pre-litigation procedure is the embodiment of judicial modesty and respect for administrative autonomy,which is conducive to improving the way of procuratorial supervision and plays an important role in protecting and relieving the public interests of the environment.
引文
[1]夏云娇,王国飞.国外环境行政公益诉讼相关立法对我国的启示———以美国、日本为例[J].湖北社会科学,2007(9):135.
[2]叶俊荣.环境政策与法律[M].中国政法大学出版社,2001:249.
[3]高桂林,刘燚.我国环境行政公益诉讼前置程序研究[J].广西社会科学,2008(1).
[4]王嘎利,杨士龙.中外视域中的环境法理论[M].知识产权出版社,2010.
[5]李沫,向明.行政公益诉讼的前置审查程序探析———基于公正和效率视角[J].江西社会科学,2010(2).
[6]韩波.公益诉讼制度的力量组合[J].当代法学,2013(1):33-34.
[7]田凯.行政公诉制度的前置程序[J].人民检察院,2011(9):20-24.