3种组织保存方法在进行流式细胞倍性分析和DNA含量测定中影响比较研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Comparisons of three methods of tissue preservation in the flow cytometry on ploidy analysis and DNA content determination
  • 作者:茆安婷 ; 尹玉伟 ; 代静 ; 郭曦尧 ; 程义 ; 李东 ; 李月红
  • 英文作者:MAO An-ting;YIN Yu-wei;DAI Jing;GUO Xi-yao;CHENG Yi;LI Dong;LI Yue-hong;Jilin Agricultural University;
  • 关键词:花羔红点鲑 ; 流式细胞仪 ; 倍性 ; DNA含量
  • 英文关键词:Salvelinus malma;;flow cytometry;;ploidy;;DNA contents
  • 中文刊名:ZSYZ
  • 英文刊名:Chinese Journal of Veterinary Medicine
  • 机构:吉林农业大学;
  • 出版日期:2018-11-22
  • 出版单位:中国兽医杂志
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.54
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金(30972191)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:ZSYZ201811008
  • 页数:4
  • CN:11
  • ISSN:11-2471/S
  • 分类号:28-31
摘要
流式细胞术能快速检测生物细胞的倍性和DNA含量,而水生生物多倍体的发掘与利用在多倍体育种和丰富物种多样性中具有重要意义。该研究利用濒危冷水鱼类花羔红点鲑鳍条组织,分别采用低温冻存、70%乙醇固定和活体采样3种方法对收集的组织进行短期保存并进行流式细胞检测,结果显示,花羔红点鲑为四倍体鱼类,3种保存方法测得的DNA含量大小为活体组织<乙醇固定<低温冻存,且DNA含量分别为3.67 pg/N、3.47 pg/N和6.0 pg/N。在组织保存效果中,70%乙醇固定的效果仅次于活体采样,低温冻存方法流式检测结果出现较多杂峰,表明这种保存方法不能保证细胞的完整性,在制备细胞悬液时破碎的细胞较多,并形成黏连体,检测效果不佳。所有被检测个体中,有一条花羔红点鲑为多倍体。
        Flow cytometry can rapidly detect ploidy and DNA content of cells,and the discovery and utilization of aquatic organisms polyploidy are important in polyploid breeding and enriching species diversity. The study use the fin tissue of Salvelinus malma, an endangered cold-water fish, using three methods that cryopreservation, fixed with 70% ethanol and living sampling forshort-term preservation of the collected tissues, and then examined by flow cytometry.The results showed that the Salvelinusmalma are tetraploid fishes, The content of DNA measured by three kinds of preservation methods was as follows: living tissue
引文
[1] Grant, V. Plant speciation (2nd ed.)[J]. New York: Columbia University Press,1981.
    [2] Bowers J E, Chapman B A, Rong J K, & Paterson, A[J]H. Unravellingangiosperm genome evolution by phylogenetic analysis of chromosomalduplication events[J]. Nature, 2003,422(6930), 433- 438.
    [3] Comai, L. The advantages and disadvantages of being polyploid[J]. NatureReviews Genetics,2005,6(11):836- 846.
    [4] Coyne, J A, & Orr, H A. Speciation. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.Dunham, R. A. (2011)[J]. Aquaculture and fisheries biotechnology: Genetic approaches.CABI Publishing,(2004).
    [5] Meyer, A, & van de Peer, Y. From 2R to 3R: Evidence for a fish-specificgenome duplication (FSGD)[J]. BioEssays,2005,27(9):937- 945.
    [6] Comai, L. The advantages and disadvantages of being polyploid. NatureReviews Genetics,2005,6(11):836- 846.
    [7] Otto, S P[J]. The evolutionary consequences of polyploidy. Cell,2007,131(3):452- 462.
    [8] Scannell, D R, Byrne K P,Gordon, J L,et al,Wong S, & Wolfe, K H[J]. Multiplerounds of speciation associated with reciprocal gene loss in polyploid yeasts.Nature,2006,440(7082):341- 345.
    [9] Wapinski I, Pfeffer A, Friedman N,et al. Natural history andevolutionary principles of gene duplication in fungi[J]. Nature,2007,449(7158):54- 61.
    [10] Lien S, Koop B F, Sandve S R,et al. TheAtlantic salmon genome provides insights into rediploidization[J]. Nature,2016,533(7602):200- 205.
    [11] Zhou L, Wang Z W, Wang Y,et al.JF Crucian carp and gibel carpculture. In J F Gui, Q S Tang, Z J Li, J S Liu, & S SDe Silva (Eds.), Success storiesin Chinese aquacuture[J]. Oxford, UK: Wiley- Blackwells (in press).2017.
    [12] Allendorf F W, & Thorgaard G H.Tetraploidy and the evolution ofsalmonid fishes. In B. J. Turner (Ed.), Evolutionary genetics of fishes (pp.1- 53)[J].New York: Plenum Press,1984.
    [13] Phillips R, & Rab. P Chromosome evolution in the Salmonidae (Pisces): Anupdate[J]. Biological Reviews,2001,76(1):1- 25.
    [14] 杨红喜, 张杰, 潘慧娟. 利用鳍条组织进行流式细胞实验的可行性研究[J].南方水产科学.2017,13(2):121- 127.
    [15] Yang H X, Zhang J, Pan H J.Feasibility study of flow cytometry using fin tissue[J].South China Fisheries Science,2017,13(2):121- 127.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700