中医师考试分阶段实证研究试卷分析与评价
|
摘要
目的评价2018年中医医师分阶段考试第一阶段实证研究理论考试试卷的质量。方法以参加2018年中医医师分阶段第一阶段实证研究理论考试的大学本科4年级末学生为样本,对考试整体情况、试卷的相关参数情况进行分析。结果 2018年有30所高等医药院校5849名考生参加了第一阶段实证研究理论考试,通过率为55. 24%。考生在中医基础、中医临床、西医基础、西医临床、医学人文5个模块的掌握率分别为66. 48%、59. 8%、49. 36%、49. 1%、71. 56%。试卷难度为0. 611,区分度为0. 259。试卷内部一致性信度为0. 962。结论考生分数呈正态分布,试卷整体情况良好,整体难度平均、区分度较好、信度良好,具有较好的结构效度和内容效度。
Objective To analysis and evaluation the quality of the first stage of TCM physician'phased theoretical examination papers in 2018. Methods Taking the end of the fourth grade undergraduate students who participated in the first stage of TCM physician'phased theoretical examination in 2018 as samples,the overall situation of the examination and the related parameters of the examination papers were analyzed. Results In 2018,5849 candidates from 30 medical universities participated in the first phase of TCM physician'phased theoretical examination,with the pass rate of 55. 24%.The mastering rates of the candidates in the basics of basic TCM,clinical TCM,basic western medicine,clinical western medicine and medical humanities was 66. 48%,59. 8%,49. 36%,49. 1% and 71. 56%,respectively. The test paper difficulty was 0. 611 and the distinction was 0. 259. The reliability of internal consistency was 0. 962. Conclusion Candidates' score basically presents normal distribution. The overall difficulty distribution of the test is average and the degree of differentiation is good,with good structural validity and content validity.
Objective To analysis and evaluation the quality of the first stage of TCM physician'phased theoretical examination papers in 2018. Methods Taking the end of the fourth grade undergraduate students who participated in the first stage of TCM physician'phased theoretical examination in 2018 as samples,the overall situation of the examination and the related parameters of the examination papers were analyzed. Results In 2018,5849 candidates from 30 medical universities participated in the first phase of TCM physician'phased theoretical examination,with the pass rate of 55. 24%.The mastering rates of the candidates in the basics of basic TCM,clinical TCM,basic western medicine,clinical western medicine and medical humanities was 66. 48%,59. 8%,49. 36%,49. 1% and 71. 56%,respectively. The test paper difficulty was 0. 611 and the distinction was 0. 259. The reliability of internal consistency was 0. 962. Conclusion Candidates' score basically presents normal distribution. The overall difficulty distribution of the test is average and the degree of differentiation is good,with good structural validity and content validity.
引文
[1]Schmeiser CB,Welch CJ. Test development/educational measurement[M]. Westport,CT:American Council on Education and Praeger Publishers,2006:307-354.
[2]桂诗春.标准化考试—理论、原则与方法[S].广州:广东高等教育出版社,1987:98.
[3]王凤珍.中医师考试技能操作将拍规范化视频[J].中医药管理杂志,2016,24(21):130.
[4]张育敏,牛晓军,刘建春,等.中医药院校西医课程教学初探[J].基础医学教育,2018,20(7):533-535.
[5]尚德阳.中医学与西医学的教学对比研究[J].辽宁中医药大学学报,2007,9(6):199-200.
[6]王智娟,朱毅.关于中医高校西医教学的调查与分析[J].中国中医药现代远程教育,2011 9(8):123-124.
[7]全国人民代表大会常务委员会.中华人民共和国中医药法[EB/OL]. 2016-12-25.
[8]徐欣,秋生,高庆山.试卷分析学校教学及教学管理的指导作用[J].北方经贸,2000(5):159-160.
[2]桂诗春.标准化考试—理论、原则与方法[S].广州:广东高等教育出版社,1987:98.
[3]王凤珍.中医师考试技能操作将拍规范化视频[J].中医药管理杂志,2016,24(21):130.
[4]张育敏,牛晓军,刘建春,等.中医药院校西医课程教学初探[J].基础医学教育,2018,20(7):533-535.
[5]尚德阳.中医学与西医学的教学对比研究[J].辽宁中医药大学学报,2007,9(6):199-200.
[6]王智娟,朱毅.关于中医高校西医教学的调查与分析[J].中国中医药现代远程教育,2011 9(8):123-124.
[7]全国人民代表大会常务委员会.中华人民共和国中医药法[EB/OL]. 2016-12-25.
[8]徐欣,秋生,高庆山.试卷分析学校教学及教学管理的指导作用[J].北方经贸,2000(5):159-160.