基于多层次AHP＿FCE评价模型的土地整治效益评价——以湖北省广水市为例
|
摘要
[目的]基于土地整治效益评价研究与应用需要,将文化效益纳入到土地整治效益评价之中,与经济、社会、生态效益一起构成效益评价的4大指标,为土地整治效益评价研究做出有益探索。[方法]采用AHP法确定各层评价指标权重,结合特尔斐法对效益评价指标划分影响等级,运用多层次AHP_FCE模型综合评价土地整治效益。[结果]广水市土地整治经济、社会、生态和文化效益评价分值分别为85.175 0、81.446 5、76.602 0、72.397 5,对应等级分别为优秀、良好、良好、合格;综合效益评价分值为79.613 5,等级为良好,符合研究区实际。[结论]多层次AHP_FCE评价模型充分地考虑了土地整治效益评价的系统性和模糊性,是较合理、科学且切实可行的研究方法,能为鄂西北地区土地整治效益评价提供重要的参考依据。
[Objective]Based on the land consolidation benefit evaluation research and application needs,this paper introduces the cultural benefits into the evaluation of land consolidation benefit,and together with the economic,social and ecological benefits constitute the 4 major indicators of efficiency evaluation,to make beneficial exploration on evaluation of land consolidation benefits.[Method]AHP method was used to determine the weight of each index,and the effect of the evaluation index was divided by the Delphi method,and the land improvement benefit was comprehensively evaluated by using the multi-level AHP_FCE model.[Result]The evaluation scores of the economic,social,ecological and cultural benefits of land improvement in Guangshui City were 85.175 0,81.446 5,76.602 0,72.397 5,and the corresponding grades were excellent,good,good and qualified. The comprehensive benefit score was 79.613 5 and the grade was good,which was in line with the actual situation of the project area.[Conclusion]The AHP_FCE model fully takes into account the systematic and fuzziness of land regulation benefit evaluation,which is a reasonable,scientific and feasible research method,it can provide an important reference for the evaluation of land improvement in northwest Hubei Province.
[Objective]Based on the land consolidation benefit evaluation research and application needs,this paper introduces the cultural benefits into the evaluation of land consolidation benefit,and together with the economic,social and ecological benefits constitute the 4 major indicators of efficiency evaluation,to make beneficial exploration on evaluation of land consolidation benefits.[Method]AHP method was used to determine the weight of each index,and the effect of the evaluation index was divided by the Delphi method,and the land improvement benefit was comprehensively evaluated by using the multi-level AHP_FCE model.[Result]The evaluation scores of the economic,social,ecological and cultural benefits of land improvement in Guangshui City were 85.175 0,81.446 5,76.602 0,72.397 5,and the corresponding grades were excellent,good,good and qualified. The comprehensive benefit score was 79.613 5 and the grade was good,which was in line with the actual situation of the project area.[Conclusion]The AHP_FCE model fully takes into account the systematic and fuzziness of land regulation benefit evaluation,which is a reasonable,scientific and feasible research method,it can provide an important reference for the evaluation of land improvement in northwest Hubei Province.
引文
[1]刘彦随.科学推进中国农村土地整治战略[J].中国土地科学,2011,25(4):3-8.
[2]徐绍史.深入开展农村土地整治搭建新农村建设和城乡统筹发展新平台[J].国土资源通迅,2009(8):6-7.
[3]王万茂.土地整理的产生、内容和效益[J].中国土地,1997(9):20-22.
[4]范金梅,王磊,薛永森.土地整理效益评价探析[J].农业工程学报,2005,21(Z1):116-118.
[5]樊敏,刘耀林,吴艳娟,等.基于云模型的土地整理生态影响评价研究[J].武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2008,33(9):986-988.
[6]杨庆媛,张占录,杨华均.土地开发整理项目社会影响评价方法探讨[J].中国土地科学,2006,20(3):44-49.
[7]李岩,赵庚星,王瑷玲,等.土地整理效益评价指标体系研究及其应用[J].农业工程学报,2006,22(10):98-101.
[8]邓胜华,梅昀,胡伟艳.基于模糊模型识别的石碑坪镇土地整理社会生态效益评价[J].中国土地科学,2009,23(3):72-75.
[9]胡振琪,余洋,付艳华,等.2014年土地科学研究重点进展评述及2015年展望——土地整治分报告[J].中国土地科学,2015,29(3):13-21.
[10]王瑷玲,赵庚星,李占军.土地整理效益项目后综合评价方法[J].农业工程学报,2006,22(4):58-61.
[11]张俊凤,花盛,刘友兆,等.基于改进灰靶模型的土地整治可持续性评价研究:以江苏省为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2014,23(2):153-160.
[12]王炜,杨晓东,曾辉,等.土地整理综合效益评价指标与方法[J].农业工程学报,2005,21(10):70-73.
[13]SAATTY T L.Analytical hierarchy process:Planning,priority setting,resource allocation[M].New York:Mc Graw Hill,1980.
[14]杨俊,王占岐,金贵,等.基于AHP与模糊综合评价的土地整治项目实施后效益评价[J].长江流域资源与环境,2013,22(8):1036-1043.
[15]李正,王军,白中科,等.基于物元评判模型的土地整理综合效益评价方法研究[J].水土保持通报,2010,30(6):190-194.
[16]周丹,盖艾鸿,杨柳.基于模糊模型识别法的土地整理综合效益分析评价研究:以格尔木市为例[J].中国农学通报,2014,30(5):208-213.
[17]张铁男,李晶蕾.对多级模糊综合评价方法的应用研究[J].哈尔滨工程大学学报,2002,23(3):132-135.
[18]曾涛,吕婧,史佳良,等.基于多层AHP-FCE评价模型的土地整治重大工程效益评价研究[J].江西农业大学学报,2017,39(6):1234-1243.
[19]李希灿,王静,邵晓梅.模糊数学方法在中国土地资源评价中的应用进展[J].地理科学进展,2009,28(3):409-416.
[20]潘润秋,刘臖,宋丹妤.基于模糊综合分析法的农用地分等方法[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(18):257-265.
[21]石剑,张路路,刘瑞卿,等.基于模糊模型识别的太行山山前平原区土地整治生态效益评价:以河北省顺平县为例[J].土壤通报,2012,43(6):1300-1304.
[22]刘琳,余莉,李正,等.基于改进模糊层次模型的土地整理效益评价研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(3):204-208.
[2]徐绍史.深入开展农村土地整治搭建新农村建设和城乡统筹发展新平台[J].国土资源通迅,2009(8):6-7.
[3]王万茂.土地整理的产生、内容和效益[J].中国土地,1997(9):20-22.
[4]范金梅,王磊,薛永森.土地整理效益评价探析[J].农业工程学报,2005,21(Z1):116-118.
[5]樊敏,刘耀林,吴艳娟,等.基于云模型的土地整理生态影响评价研究[J].武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2008,33(9):986-988.
[6]杨庆媛,张占录,杨华均.土地开发整理项目社会影响评价方法探讨[J].中国土地科学,2006,20(3):44-49.
[7]李岩,赵庚星,王瑷玲,等.土地整理效益评价指标体系研究及其应用[J].农业工程学报,2006,22(10):98-101.
[8]邓胜华,梅昀,胡伟艳.基于模糊模型识别的石碑坪镇土地整理社会生态效益评价[J].中国土地科学,2009,23(3):72-75.
[9]胡振琪,余洋,付艳华,等.2014年土地科学研究重点进展评述及2015年展望——土地整治分报告[J].中国土地科学,2015,29(3):13-21.
[10]王瑷玲,赵庚星,李占军.土地整理效益项目后综合评价方法[J].农业工程学报,2006,22(4):58-61.
[11]张俊凤,花盛,刘友兆,等.基于改进灰靶模型的土地整治可持续性评价研究:以江苏省为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2014,23(2):153-160.
[12]王炜,杨晓东,曾辉,等.土地整理综合效益评价指标与方法[J].农业工程学报,2005,21(10):70-73.
[13]SAATTY T L.Analytical hierarchy process:Planning,priority setting,resource allocation[M].New York:Mc Graw Hill,1980.
[14]杨俊,王占岐,金贵,等.基于AHP与模糊综合评价的土地整治项目实施后效益评价[J].长江流域资源与环境,2013,22(8):1036-1043.
[15]李正,王军,白中科,等.基于物元评判模型的土地整理综合效益评价方法研究[J].水土保持通报,2010,30(6):190-194.
[16]周丹,盖艾鸿,杨柳.基于模糊模型识别法的土地整理综合效益分析评价研究:以格尔木市为例[J].中国农学通报,2014,30(5):208-213.
[17]张铁男,李晶蕾.对多级模糊综合评价方法的应用研究[J].哈尔滨工程大学学报,2002,23(3):132-135.
[18]曾涛,吕婧,史佳良,等.基于多层AHP-FCE评价模型的土地整治重大工程效益评价研究[J].江西农业大学学报,2017,39(6):1234-1243.
[19]李希灿,王静,邵晓梅.模糊数学方法在中国土地资源评价中的应用进展[J].地理科学进展,2009,28(3):409-416.
[20]潘润秋,刘臖,宋丹妤.基于模糊综合分析法的农用地分等方法[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(18):257-265.
[21]石剑,张路路,刘瑞卿,等.基于模糊模型识别的太行山山前平原区土地整治生态效益评价:以河北省顺平县为例[J].土壤通报,2012,43(6):1300-1304.
[22]刘琳,余莉,李正,等.基于改进模糊层次模型的土地整理效益评价研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(3):204-208.