山西霍山森林植物功能型土壤理化性质研究
|
摘要
采用群落生态学的调查方法,在霍山七里峪设置80个样方并采集土壤样品.通过对霍山七里峪暖温带天然次生林不同功能型与土壤理化性质及环境因子关系的分析,得出结论:在以油松Pinus tabulaeformis Carr、华北落叶松Larix principis-rupprechtii Mayr等针叶树种为优势种的功能型林下土壤PH值呈弱酸性,而以辽东栎Quercus wutaishanica Blume、白桦Betula platyphylla Suk、山核桃Carya cathayensis Sarg等阔叶树种为优势种的功能型,其林下土壤则呈弱碱性.土壤水分含量、土壤有机质含量、碱解氮和全氮的含量、全磷含量、速效钾含量均有随海拔的升高缓慢增加的趋势.与之相反的是,全钾的含量则随海拔的升高缓慢下降.有效磷含量随海拔的上升先升高而后又降低.
Adopting the investigation method of ecology,80 quadrates were set up and 80 soil samples were collected at Qi Li Yu of Huoshan Mountain. Through the analysis,relationship between the factor of seven in the HuoShanQiliyu warm temperate natural forest of different functional and physicochemical properties of soil and environment. The result shows that the soil pH value function in Pinus tabulaeformis Carr,Larix principis-rupprechtii Mayr. And other coniferous species was the dominant species in the forest showed a weak acid,and Quercus wutaishanica Blume,Betula platyphylla Suk,Carya cathayensis Sarg such as Broad-leaved tree species function of the dominant species,the forest soil is weakly alkaline. Soil moisture content,soil organic matter content,alkali hydrolyzable nitrogen and total nitrogen content,total phosphorus content and available potassium content all increased slowly along with the elevation. In contrast,the total potassium content decreased slowly with the elevation of altitude. The content of effective phosphorus increases first and then decreases with the rise of altitude.
Adopting the investigation method of ecology,80 quadrates were set up and 80 soil samples were collected at Qi Li Yu of Huoshan Mountain. Through the analysis,relationship between the factor of seven in the HuoShanQiliyu warm temperate natural forest of different functional and physicochemical properties of soil and environment. The result shows that the soil pH value function in Pinus tabulaeformis Carr,Larix principis-rupprechtii Mayr. And other coniferous species was the dominant species in the forest showed a weak acid,and Quercus wutaishanica Blume,Betula platyphylla Suk,Carya cathayensis Sarg such as Broad-leaved tree species function of the dominant species,the forest soil is weakly alkaline. Soil moisture content,soil organic matter content,alkali hydrolyzable nitrogen and total nitrogen content,total phosphorus content and available potassium content all increased slowly along with the elevation. In contrast,the total potassium content decreased slowly with the elevation of altitude. The content of effective phosphorus increases first and then decreases with the rise of altitude.
引文
[1] Golluscio R A,Sala O E. Plant functional types and ecological strategies in Patagonian forbs[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science,1993,4:839~846.
[2]张国钧,张荣,周立.植物功能多样性与功能群研究进展[J].生态学报,2003,23(7):1430~1435.
[3]马建军,高吉喜,姚虹,等.内蒙古辉河自然保护区植物功能型的空间异性研究[J].生态与农村环境学报,2014,30(2):182~188.
[4]秦浩,董刚,张峰.山西植物功能型划分及其空间格局[J].生态学报,2015,35(2):396~408.
[5] Paruelo J M,Lauenroth W K. Relative abundance of plant functional types in grasslands and shrublands of North America[J]. Ecological Applications,1996,(6):1212~1224.
[6] Gitay H,Noble I R. What are functional types and how should we seek them? Dans Vegetational functional types:Their relevance to ecosystem properties and global change[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1997. 3~19.
[7] Jacques Blondel. Guilds or functional groups:does it matter[J]. OIKOS,2003,100:223~231.
[8]丁献华,闫明,张慧芳,等.山西霍山暖温带次生林植物功能型的划分[J].山西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2010,24(3):71~76.
[9]丁献华,毕润成,张慧芳,等.霍山七里峪植物群落的种类组成和生活型谱分析[J].安徽农业科学,2010,38(22):12032~12033.
[10]丁献华,毕润成,闫明.基于CCA排序的霍山森林植物功能型划分[J].重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版),2011,28(1):64~67.
[11] Bugmann H. Functional types of trees in temperate and boreal forests:Classification and testing[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science,1996,7:359~370.
[12] Noble,I.&Gitay,H. A functional classification for predicting the dynamics of landscapes[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science,1996,7:329~336.
[13]游秀花,蒋尔可.不同森林类型土壤化学性质的比较研究[J].江西农业大学学报,2005,27(3):357~360.
[14]林德喜,樊后保,苏兵强,等.马尾松林下套种阔叶树土壤理化性质的研究[J].土壤学报,2004,41(4):655~659.
[15]何小琴,蒋志荣,王刚,等.子午岭地区植被恢复演替过程与环境因子的分类与排序[J].西北植物学报,2007,27(3):601~606.
[16]白永飞,陈佐忠.锡林河流域羊草草原植物种群和功能型的长期变异性及其对群落稳定性的影响[J].植物生态学报,2000,24(6):641~647.
[17]牛书丽,蒋高明,高雷鸣,等.浑善达克沙地不同植物功能型光合作用和水分利用特征的比较[J].生态学报,2005,4(25):699~704.
[2]张国钧,张荣,周立.植物功能多样性与功能群研究进展[J].生态学报,2003,23(7):1430~1435.
[3]马建军,高吉喜,姚虹,等.内蒙古辉河自然保护区植物功能型的空间异性研究[J].生态与农村环境学报,2014,30(2):182~188.
[4]秦浩,董刚,张峰.山西植物功能型划分及其空间格局[J].生态学报,2015,35(2):396~408.
[5] Paruelo J M,Lauenroth W K. Relative abundance of plant functional types in grasslands and shrublands of North America[J]. Ecological Applications,1996,(6):1212~1224.
[6] Gitay H,Noble I R. What are functional types and how should we seek them? Dans Vegetational functional types:Their relevance to ecosystem properties and global change[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1997. 3~19.
[7] Jacques Blondel. Guilds or functional groups:does it matter[J]. OIKOS,2003,100:223~231.
[8]丁献华,闫明,张慧芳,等.山西霍山暖温带次生林植物功能型的划分[J].山西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2010,24(3):71~76.
[9]丁献华,毕润成,张慧芳,等.霍山七里峪植物群落的种类组成和生活型谱分析[J].安徽农业科学,2010,38(22):12032~12033.
[10]丁献华,毕润成,闫明.基于CCA排序的霍山森林植物功能型划分[J].重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版),2011,28(1):64~67.
[11] Bugmann H. Functional types of trees in temperate and boreal forests:Classification and testing[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science,1996,7:359~370.
[12] Noble,I.&Gitay,H. A functional classification for predicting the dynamics of landscapes[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science,1996,7:329~336.
[13]游秀花,蒋尔可.不同森林类型土壤化学性质的比较研究[J].江西农业大学学报,2005,27(3):357~360.
[14]林德喜,樊后保,苏兵强,等.马尾松林下套种阔叶树土壤理化性质的研究[J].土壤学报,2004,41(4):655~659.
[15]何小琴,蒋志荣,王刚,等.子午岭地区植被恢复演替过程与环境因子的分类与排序[J].西北植物学报,2007,27(3):601~606.
[16]白永飞,陈佐忠.锡林河流域羊草草原植物种群和功能型的长期变异性及其对群落稳定性的影响[J].植物生态学报,2000,24(6):641~647.
[17]牛书丽,蒋高明,高雷鸣,等.浑善达克沙地不同植物功能型光合作用和水分利用特征的比较[J].生态学报,2005,4(25):699~704.