微信用户信息交互中的关系维护与私人空间边界问题分析
|
摘要
文章采用网络调查法,针对微信用户的个体关系、群体关系及其私人空间边界问题进行调查和实证分析。结果表明:微信同时促进了用户的个体关系和群体关系,微信用户拥有人数最多且亲密度最高的个体关系是同学和家人,在群体中,用户更愿意与亲密度高的好友交流,亲密度一般时,共同兴趣是维持群体关系的主要因素。在私人空间方面,高亲密度私人空间边界主要由内容主导;低亲密度私人空间主要由生活需要主导。无论关系怎样,信息内容都是私人空间保护的重点。对亲密度越高的好友,交互屏蔽的比例越小,用户划定的私人空间边界越大,对信息打扰行为的容忍程度越高。根据上述结论,本文进一步提出了针对性的建议。
By questionnaire survey online,this paper investigates and analysis the Wechat users’relationship between individuals and groups,as well as the boundary of their private space through the empirical analysis method.The results showed that the WeChat promotes the relationship between individuals and groups,in individual relationship,classmates and family members are the most and the highest degree of intimacy relationships;in groups,users prefer to communicate with close friends,when the intimacy is moderate,the common interests is the main factor to maintain the group relationship.In private space,the high intimacy private space boundary is determined by the information content;the low intimacy private space boundary is divided by the needs of users’personal life.No matter what relationship is,the information content is the key point to the private space protection.To more intimate friends,the user divides bigger private space boundary and has higher tolerance for information intrusion.Based on the findings above,this paper puts forward some specific suggestions further.
By questionnaire survey online,this paper investigates and analysis the Wechat users’relationship between individuals and groups,as well as the boundary of their private space through the empirical analysis method.The results showed that the WeChat promotes the relationship between individuals and groups,in individual relationship,classmates and family members are the most and the highest degree of intimacy relationships;in groups,users prefer to communicate with close friends,when the intimacy is moderate,the common interests is the main factor to maintain the group relationship.In private space,the high intimacy private space boundary is determined by the information content;the low intimacy private space boundary is divided by the needs of users’personal life.No matter what relationship is,the information content is the key point to the private space protection.To more intimate friends,the user divides bigger private space boundary and has higher tolerance for information intrusion.Based on the findings above,this paper puts forward some specific suggestions further.
引文
[1]Kim K S,Sin S C J,Yoo-Lee E Y.Undergraduates'use of social media as information sources[J].College&Research Libraries,2014,75(4):442-457.
[2]2017微信数据报告|猎云网[EB/OL].[2018-05-20].http://www.lieyunwang.com/archives/381254.
[3]陈美岚.构建大学生和谐人际关系研究[D].桂林:广西师范大学,2014.
[4]乔木.现代网络社交工具对大学生人际关系的影响及对策研究[D].成都:成都理工大学,2012.
[5]Liang C J,Chen H J.How to lengthen,deepen and broaden customer-firm relationships with online financial services?[J].Journal of Financial Services Marketing,2009,14(3):218-231.
[6]Kossinets G,Watts D.Origins of homophily in an evolving social network[J].American Journal of Sociology,2009,115(2):405-450.
[7]Thewall M.Homophily in my space[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2009,60(2):219-231.
[8]Grannovetter M S.The strength of weak ties:a network theory revisited[J].Sociological Theory,1983,1(6):201-233.
[9]吕行佳.社交网络中的强弱关系转化[J].新闻研究导刊,2017(5):76,120.
[10]甘春梅.社交媒体使用动机与功能使用的关系研究:以微信为例[J].图书情报工作,2017(11):106-115.
[11]潘小双,岳远征.微信空间的“公私媾和”趋势探析[J].视听,2016(4):147-148.
[12]Li G,Jung J R.Factors enhancing mobile social networking friendship maintenance:a study of alumni community on WeChat[J].Cluster Computing,2017(1):1-12.
[13]毕素雅.微信传播对人际关系的影响研究[D].沈阳:辽宁大学,2015.
[14]唐金杰.微信朋友圈的人际互动模式研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2015.
[15]蒋建国.微信朋友圈泛化:交往疲劳与情感疏离[J].现代传播(中国传媒大学报),2016(8):67-71.
[16]宋江波.微信朋友圈对人际交往的影响研究[D].南宁:广西大学,2014.
[17]郭禹汐.微信“朋友圈”研究[D].北京:北京邮电大学,2015.
[18]郭欣.微信“朋友圈”人际关系研究[D].济南:山东大学,2015.
[19]王欢,祝阳.手机媒介互动性对大学生人际关系维护的效用分析[J].重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版),2011(2):27-31.
[20]仇乐,罗彬.微信强关系的消解:交往与情感的“貌合神离”[J].新媒体研究,2017(6):1-2,77.
[21]Ryan R M,Deci E L.Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations:classic definitions and new directions[J].Contemporary Educational Psychology,2000,25(1):54-67.
[22]孙源南,权相禧.社交网络公共空间与私人空间认知的实证研究--基于人人网、QQ使用者的调查分析[J].青年记者,2013(12下):39-42.
[23]蔡月亮,陈长松,戴海波.论融合媒介精神空间中公共空间与私人空间的融合及影响[J].新闻知识,2014(6):11-12,100.
[24]汪雅倩,王学琛.从社交平台到表演舞台:微信分组设置对熟人关系的回归[J].新闻知识,2017(10):18-24.
[25]周大勇,孙红昶.互联网“圈子”传播:分层互动与关系的弥合[J].图书馆学研究,2018(17):17-21.
[26]吴佳妮.大学生朋友圈社交压力的反弹现象分析--基于12位高校大学生的深度访谈[J].今传媒,2017(7):77-78.
[27]汪雅倩,王学琛.从社交平台到表演舞台:微信分组设置对熟人关系的回归[J].新闻知识,2017(10):18-24.
[28]陆伟晶.没有“朋友”的朋友圈--陌生人语境下微信朋友圈的社交悖论[J].新闻研究导刊,2017,8(15):65-66.
[29]周安平.私人空间与公共空间漫谈[J].浙江社会科学,2017(5):148-150,160.
[30]Gan C.Understanding WeChat users'liking behavior:an empirical study in China[J].Computers in Human Behavior,2017,68:30-39.
[31]第42次《中国互联网络发展状况统计报告》[EB/OL].[2018-10-09].http://www.cnnic.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/hlwtjbg/201808/P020180820630889299840.pdf.
[32]2016年中国社交应用用户行为研究报告[EB/OL].[2018-10-09].http://www.cnnic.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/.
[2]2017微信数据报告|猎云网[EB/OL].[2018-05-20].http://www.lieyunwang.com/archives/381254.
[3]陈美岚.构建大学生和谐人际关系研究[D].桂林:广西师范大学,2014.
[4]乔木.现代网络社交工具对大学生人际关系的影响及对策研究[D].成都:成都理工大学,2012.
[5]Liang C J,Chen H J.How to lengthen,deepen and broaden customer-firm relationships with online financial services?[J].Journal of Financial Services Marketing,2009,14(3):218-231.
[6]Kossinets G,Watts D.Origins of homophily in an evolving social network[J].American Journal of Sociology,2009,115(2):405-450.
[7]Thewall M.Homophily in my space[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2009,60(2):219-231.
[8]Grannovetter M S.The strength of weak ties:a network theory revisited[J].Sociological Theory,1983,1(6):201-233.
[9]吕行佳.社交网络中的强弱关系转化[J].新闻研究导刊,2017(5):76,120.
[10]甘春梅.社交媒体使用动机与功能使用的关系研究:以微信为例[J].图书情报工作,2017(11):106-115.
[11]潘小双,岳远征.微信空间的“公私媾和”趋势探析[J].视听,2016(4):147-148.
[12]Li G,Jung J R.Factors enhancing mobile social networking friendship maintenance:a study of alumni community on WeChat[J].Cluster Computing,2017(1):1-12.
[13]毕素雅.微信传播对人际关系的影响研究[D].沈阳:辽宁大学,2015.
[14]唐金杰.微信朋友圈的人际互动模式研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2015.
[15]蒋建国.微信朋友圈泛化:交往疲劳与情感疏离[J].现代传播(中国传媒大学报),2016(8):67-71.
[16]宋江波.微信朋友圈对人际交往的影响研究[D].南宁:广西大学,2014.
[17]郭禹汐.微信“朋友圈”研究[D].北京:北京邮电大学,2015.
[18]郭欣.微信“朋友圈”人际关系研究[D].济南:山东大学,2015.
[19]王欢,祝阳.手机媒介互动性对大学生人际关系维护的效用分析[J].重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版),2011(2):27-31.
[20]仇乐,罗彬.微信强关系的消解:交往与情感的“貌合神离”[J].新媒体研究,2017(6):1-2,77.
[21]Ryan R M,Deci E L.Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations:classic definitions and new directions[J].Contemporary Educational Psychology,2000,25(1):54-67.
[22]孙源南,权相禧.社交网络公共空间与私人空间认知的实证研究--基于人人网、QQ使用者的调查分析[J].青年记者,2013(12下):39-42.
[23]蔡月亮,陈长松,戴海波.论融合媒介精神空间中公共空间与私人空间的融合及影响[J].新闻知识,2014(6):11-12,100.
[24]汪雅倩,王学琛.从社交平台到表演舞台:微信分组设置对熟人关系的回归[J].新闻知识,2017(10):18-24.
[25]周大勇,孙红昶.互联网“圈子”传播:分层互动与关系的弥合[J].图书馆学研究,2018(17):17-21.
[26]吴佳妮.大学生朋友圈社交压力的反弹现象分析--基于12位高校大学生的深度访谈[J].今传媒,2017(7):77-78.
[27]汪雅倩,王学琛.从社交平台到表演舞台:微信分组设置对熟人关系的回归[J].新闻知识,2017(10):18-24.
[28]陆伟晶.没有“朋友”的朋友圈--陌生人语境下微信朋友圈的社交悖论[J].新闻研究导刊,2017,8(15):65-66.
[29]周安平.私人空间与公共空间漫谈[J].浙江社会科学,2017(5):148-150,160.
[30]Gan C.Understanding WeChat users'liking behavior:an empirical study in China[J].Computers in Human Behavior,2017,68:30-39.
[31]第42次《中国互联网络发展状况统计报告》[EB/OL].[2018-10-09].http://www.cnnic.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/hlwtjbg/201808/P020180820630889299840.pdf.
[32]2016年中国社交应用用户行为研究报告[EB/OL].[2018-10-09].http://www.cnnic.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/.