大夫第:传统村落的家族空间单元研究——以宁波韩岭下郑家为例
|
摘要
文章是对传统村落中一个具体的家族空间——大夫第的考察、分析及规划研究。大夫第作为我国居住遗产的特定形式,尽管存在着地域文化、等级规模、空间格局及建筑形制的千差万别,但是作为上层社会家族空间的典型代表,集官、商、绅、民于一体,有着共同的儒家文化背景、传统宗族观念和社会道德价值,是国与家的理念在居住空间上的投影。以宁波市东钱湖韩岭村的下郑家大夫第为例,研究大夫等的文化渊源、宗族结构及空间格局,在此基础上,进一步反思现行传统村落保护规划,提出了基于叙事主题的历史单元概念。
This paper is about the investigation, analysis and planning research on a specific clan space in a traditional village. The Dafu's House is a particular form of Chinese residential culture heritage. Although varied in regional culture, scale, spatial pattern, architectural style, it is representative of the upper-class clan space, which integrates officials, businessman, squire,civilian, and shares Confucian cultural background, the traditional concept of clan and social moral values. The Dafu's House is the image of the concept of country and family on living space. Taking the Dafu's House of Later Zheng Clan in Hanling, Ningbo as an example, the paper studies the cultural origin, clan structure and spatial pattern, further reflects the current conservation planning of traditional villages, and puts forward the concept of history unit based on narrative theme.
This paper is about the investigation, analysis and planning research on a specific clan space in a traditional village. The Dafu's House is a particular form of Chinese residential culture heritage. Although varied in regional culture, scale, spatial pattern, architectural style, it is representative of the upper-class clan space, which integrates officials, businessman, squire,civilian, and shares Confucian cultural background, the traditional concept of clan and social moral values. The Dafu's House is the image of the concept of country and family on living space. Taking the Dafu's House of Later Zheng Clan in Hanling, Ningbo as an example, the paper studies the cultural origin, clan structure and spatial pattern, further reflects the current conservation planning of traditional villages, and puts forward the concept of history unit based on narrative theme.
引文
[1]姜朋.法律儒家化前观——中国礼法文化传统的一种解读[J].法理学论丛,2014(8):153-164.
[2]石增礼.中国古代建筑类型与分类[D].杭州:浙江大学,2004.
[3]傅衣凌.明清农村社会经济明清社会经济变迁论[M].北京:中华书局,2007.
[4]刘军,王询.中国古代宗族聚居与宗族形态的历史考察[J].北方论丛,2007(1):105-109.
[5]林耀华.义序的宗族研究[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2000.
[6]常建华.宋明以来宗族制形成理论辨析[J].安徽史学,2007(1):75-87.
[7]刘振.人性道统论[D].北京:中央民族大学,2012.
[8]仇国华.新编东钱湖志[M].宁波:宁波出版社,2014.
[9]何依,龙婷婷,邓巍.从老墙门到堂前——基于聚居形态演变阶段的古村落群体保护研究[C]//中国城市规划学会.城乡治理与规划改革——2014中国城市规划年会论文集.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2014:376-386.
[10]孙晓曦.基于宗族结构的传统村落肌理演化及整合研究——以宁波市韩岭历史文化名村为例[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2015.
[11]何依,孙亮.基于宗族结构的传统村落院落单元研究——以宁波市走马塘历史文化名村保护规划为例[J].建筑学报,2017(2):90-95.
[12]黄南珊.20世纪西方美学中的艺术情感理论通观[J].求是学刊,1996(2):66-71.
[2]石增礼.中国古代建筑类型与分类[D].杭州:浙江大学,2004.
[3]傅衣凌.明清农村社会经济明清社会经济变迁论[M].北京:中华书局,2007.
[4]刘军,王询.中国古代宗族聚居与宗族形态的历史考察[J].北方论丛,2007(1):105-109.
[5]林耀华.义序的宗族研究[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2000.
[6]常建华.宋明以来宗族制形成理论辨析[J].安徽史学,2007(1):75-87.
[7]刘振.人性道统论[D].北京:中央民族大学,2012.
[8]仇国华.新编东钱湖志[M].宁波:宁波出版社,2014.
[9]何依,龙婷婷,邓巍.从老墙门到堂前——基于聚居形态演变阶段的古村落群体保护研究[C]//中国城市规划学会.城乡治理与规划改革——2014中国城市规划年会论文集.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2014:376-386.
[10]孙晓曦.基于宗族结构的传统村落肌理演化及整合研究——以宁波市韩岭历史文化名村为例[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2015.
[11]何依,孙亮.基于宗族结构的传统村落院落单元研究——以宁波市走马塘历史文化名村保护规划为例[J].建筑学报,2017(2):90-95.
[12]黄南珊.20世纪西方美学中的艺术情感理论通观[J].求是学刊,1996(2):66-71.