腔内修复与保守治疗Stanford B型主动脉夹层的疗效比较
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Comparative study of endovascular and conservative treatment in Stanford type B aortic dissection
  • 作者:姜海军 ; 霍静 ; 赵博 ; 李潇 ; 杨植 ; 陈磊 ; 尹晶 ; 徐繁
  • 英文作者:Hai-jun Jiang;Jing Huo;Bo Zhao;Xiao Li;Zhi Yang;Lei Chen;Jing Yin;Fan Xu;Department of Vascular Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University;Department of General Practice, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University;Department of Transfusion, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University;Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University;Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University;
  • 关键词:主动脉疾病 ; 支架 ; 药物疗法 ; 血管外科手术
  • 英文关键词:aortic disease;;stent;;drug therapy;;vascular surgery
  • 中文刊名:ZXDY
  • 英文刊名:China Journal of Modern Medicine
  • 机构:承德医学院附属医院血管普外科;承德医学院附属医院全科医学科;承德医学院附属医院输血科;承德医学院附属医院放射科;承德医学院附属医院肿瘤内科;
  • 出版日期:2019-03-18 11:33
  • 出版单位:中国现代医学杂志
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.29
  • 基金:河北省2017年度医学科学研究重点课题(No:20170877)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:ZXDY201905013
  • 页数:5
  • CN:05
  • ISSN:43-1225/R
  • 分类号:71-75
摘要
目的探讨腔内修复与保守治疗Stanford B型主动脉夹层的疗效及治疗策略。方法选取2015年6月—2016年6月承德医学院附属医院接受治疗的72例Stanford B型主动脉夹层患者为研究对象,开展前瞻性随机对照研究。患者均无并发症,按入院先后顺序随机划分为腔内治疗组和保守治疗组,每组36例,腔内治疗接受腔内修复治疗,保守治疗组接受保守治疗。比较两组近期治疗效果及并发症发生情况,随访时间转院当日至2017年12月,观察中期预后。结果腔内治疗组中35例(97.22%)、保守治疗组中27例(75.00%)症状缓解出院,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P <0.05),保守治疗组症状缓解出院者较腔内治疗组少;两组院内病死率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);随访期间,两组累积生存率及并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);腔内治疗组血栓形成率与保守治疗组比较,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05),腔内治疗组高于保守治疗组;腔内治疗组治疗后假腔最大直径与保守治疗组比较,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05),腔内治疗组小于保守治疗组。结论腔内治疗的院内近期疗效较保守治疗好;对症状缓解出院患者,两种治疗方法的中期预后相似。
        Objective To investigate the efficacy of endovascular repair and conservative treatment of Stanford type B aortic dissection. Methods A prospective randomized controlled study was carried out in 72 patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection in our hospital from June 2015 to June 2016. All patients were of no complications.Patients were randomly divided into conservative treatment group and endovascular treatment group(n = 36).Patients in conservative treatment received medication for hypertension and pain without any surgical interventions.Patients in endovascular group received endovascular repair of aortic dissection. The short-term and medium-term effect of treatment as well as occurrence of complications were recorded. Results Incidence of symptom relief in endovascular group was increased significantly compared with that in conservative treatment group(97.22% VS 75.00%, P < 0.05). No statistically significant difference in in-hospital mortality or cumulative survival was identified between the two groups(P > 0.05). Thrombosis rate of false lumen was increased while max diameter of false lumen was decreased obviously in endovascular treatment group compared with those in conservative treatment group(P < 0.05). Conclusions Endovascular treatment is superiror to conservative treatment for patients with aortic dissection, especially in aspect of symptom relief.
引文
[1]陈纪言,罗淞元,刘媛.急性主动脉夹层的腔内修复术治疗现状与展望[J].中国循环杂志,2014,29(1):1-3.
    [2]SUEYOSHI E,ONITSUKA H,NAGAAMA H,et al.Endovascular repair of aortic dissection and intramural hematoma:indications and serial changes[J].Springerplus,2014(3):670.
    [3]YANG B,PATEL H J,WILLIAMS D M,et al.Management of type:a dissection with malperfusion[J].Ann Cardiothorac Surg,2016,5(4):265-274.
    [4]PATEL A Y,EAGLE K A,VAISHNAVA P.Acute type B aortic dissection:insights from the international registry of acute aortic dissection[J].Ann Cardiothorac Surg,2014,3(4):368-374.
    [5]陈作观,李拥军.腔内治疗急性与非急性Stanford B型夹层国内文献的Meta分析[J].中华普通外科杂志,2016,31(8):681-685.
    [6]黄小勇,黄连军,郭曦,等.“两段式”覆膜支架置入术个性化治疗Stanford B型主动脉夹层的效果[J].中华心血管病杂志,2015,43(1):39-43.
    [7]胡锐,王志维,胡小平.Stanford B型主动脉夹层的治疗选择[J].中华普通外科杂志,2014,29(7):538-541.
    [8]NIENABER C A,FATTORI R,LUND G,et al.Nonsurgical reconstruction of thoracic aortic dissection by stent-graft placement[J].N Engl J Med,1999,340(20):1539-1545.
    [9]马祥云,赵根尚.Stanford B型主动脉夹层覆膜支架腔内修复术近中期的疗效[J].实用医学杂志,2017,33(23):3942-3945.
    [10]付志明,李潮杰,李志,等.Standford B型主动脉夹层动脉瘤覆膜支架修复术的临床效果分析[J].临床放射学杂志,2015,34(9):1476-1479.
    [11]AMELI-RENANI S,DAS R,MORGAN R A.Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for the treatment of aortic dissection:post-operative imaging,complications and secondary interventions[J].Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol,2015,38(6):1391-1404.
    [12]陶然,梁惠民,冯敢生,等.Stanford B型主动脉夹层腔内修复术后血管重塑分析[J].介入放射学杂志,2016,25(3):206-209.
    [13]VIRTUE Registry Investigators.Mid-term outcomes and aortic remodelling after thoracic endovascular repair for acute,subacute,and chronic aortic dissection:the VIRTUE Registry[J].Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg,2014,48(4):363-371.
    [14]ROHLFFS F,TSILIMPARIS N,DIENER H,et al.Chronic type B aortic dissection:indications and strategies for treatment[J].JCardiovasc Surg(Torino),2015,56(2):231-238.
    [15]GROMMES J,GREINER A,BENDERMACHER B,et al.Risk factors for mortality and failure of conservative treatment after aortic type B dissection[J].J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2014,148(5):2155-2160.
    [16]WASINRAT J,LERTKOWIT M,SIRIAPISITH T.Growth rate of aortic diameter in post treatment of aortic dissection[J].J Med Assoc Thai,2015,98(9):902-909.
    [17]BANNAZADEH M,TADROS R O,MCKINSEY J,et al.Contemporary management of type B aortic dissection in the endovascular era[J].Surg Technol Int,2016,28(4):214-221.
    [18]CHEN D,MüLLER-ESCHNER M,KOTELIS D,et al.Alongitudinal study of Type-B aortic dissection and endovascular repair scenarios:computational analyses[J].Med Eng Phys,2013,35(9):1321-1330.
    [19]朱岩,刘建民,翟水亭.开放手术与腔内修复术治疗复杂性B型主动脉夹层的远期疗效比较[J].实用医学杂志,2016,32(5):747-750.
    [20]MOULAKAKIS K G,MYLONAS S N,DALAINAS I,et al.Management of complicated and uncomplicated acute type B dissection.A systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Ann Cardiothorac Surg,2014,3(3):234-246.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700